Review Article On Recent Trends in Surgical Techniques for High-grade Spondylolisthesis

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Rajendra Sakhrekar
{"title":"Review Article On Recent Trends in Surgical Techniques for High-grade Spondylolisthesis","authors":"Rajendra Sakhrekar","doi":"10.13107/jor.2019.v06i01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: High-grade spondylolisthesis is defined as cases with more than 50% displacement and spondylolisthesis with Meyerding grade III and higher. The surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is highly controversial. Many surgical methods have been reported like posterior in situ fusion, instrumented posterior fusion with or without reduction, combined anterior and posterior procedures, spondylectomy with reduction of L4 to the sacrum (for spondyloptosis), posterior interbody fusion with trans-sacral fixation. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis has also been recently mentioned in literature. This study aimed to review the recent literature which has described the surgical outcomes associated with various surgical techniques used for high-grade spondylolisthesis\nMaterials and Methods: Recent articles were searched on search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar with the use of Keywords like ‘High-grade Spondylolisthesis’, ‘Surgical Techniques’ ‘complications’.\nDiscussion: The surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is an area of significant controversies. The literature is replete with regards to need for reduction, need for decompression, levels of fusion, the nature of instrumentation, surgical approaches including open, minimally invasive, and “mini-open” procedures, as well as various techniques for reduction of the slip and fusion strategy. The three basic options of high-grade spondylolisthesis include in-situ fusion, partial reduction and fusion, and complete reduction.\nConclusion: Various techniques have been described for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification gives guidelines about balanced and unbalanced pelvis and advising reduction and fusion in case of unbalanced pelvis for correction of biomechanical and global sagittal alignment. Each of the surgical techniques has their own advantages and disadvantages. Although individual a","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jor.2019.v06i01.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-grade spondylolisthesis is defined as cases with more than 50% displacement and spondylolisthesis with Meyerding grade III and higher. The surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is highly controversial. Many surgical methods have been reported like posterior in situ fusion, instrumented posterior fusion with or without reduction, combined anterior and posterior procedures, spondylectomy with reduction of L4 to the sacrum (for spondyloptosis), posterior interbody fusion with trans-sacral fixation. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis has also been recently mentioned in literature. This study aimed to review the recent literature which has described the surgical outcomes associated with various surgical techniques used for high-grade spondylolisthesis Materials and Methods: Recent articles were searched on search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar with the use of Keywords like ‘High-grade Spondylolisthesis’, ‘Surgical Techniques’ ‘complications’. Discussion: The surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is an area of significant controversies. The literature is replete with regards to need for reduction, need for decompression, levels of fusion, the nature of instrumentation, surgical approaches including open, minimally invasive, and “mini-open” procedures, as well as various techniques for reduction of the slip and fusion strategy. The three basic options of high-grade spondylolisthesis include in-situ fusion, partial reduction and fusion, and complete reduction. Conclusion: Various techniques have been described for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification gives guidelines about balanced and unbalanced pelvis and advising reduction and fusion in case of unbalanced pelvis for correction of biomechanical and global sagittal alignment. Each of the surgical techniques has their own advantages and disadvantages. Although individual a
高度椎体滑脱手术技术的最新趋势综述
重度椎体滑脱定义为移位超过50%且椎体滑脱为Meyerding III级及以上。高度椎体滑脱的手术治疗争议很大。许多手术方法已被报道,如后路原位融合术、带复位或不带复位的固定式后路融合术、前后联合手术、椎体切除术并将L4复位到骶骨(治疗颈椎病)、后路椎间融合术并经骶骨固定。微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗高度腰椎滑脱最近也有文献报道。本研究旨在回顾最近的文献,这些文献描述了与各种手术技术相关的手术结果,用于治疗高度脊椎滑脱。材料和方法:最近的文章在PubMed、Google Scholar等搜索引擎上搜索,关键词是“高度脊椎滑脱”、“手术技术”、“并发症”。讨论:高度脊柱滑脱的手术治疗是一个有重大争议的领域。文献中充满了关于复位需求、减压需求、融合水平、内固定的性质、手术入路,包括开放、微创和“迷你开放”手术,以及各种复位滑移和融合策略的技术。高度椎体滑脱的三种基本选择包括原位融合、部分复位融合和完全复位。结论:各种技术已经被描述用于治疗重度脊柱滑脱。脊柱畸形研究小组(SDSG)的分类给出了骨盆平衡和不平衡的指南,并建议在骨盆不平衡的情况下进行复位和融合,以纠正生物力学和整体矢状位对齐。每种手术技术都有自己的优点和缺点。虽然个人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信