Internal Sound Pressure Level Estimation Considering Design Through Computational Aeroacoustics

Olivier Macchion, Leszek Lukasz Stachyra, H. Morand
{"title":"Internal Sound Pressure Level Estimation Considering Design Through Computational Aeroacoustics","authors":"Olivier Macchion, Leszek Lukasz Stachyra, H. Morand","doi":"10.4043/31614-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsea chokes differ from the standard choke designs that can be found in for example the IEC 60534-8-3 standard, due to their geometry but also due to the environment. Contrary to topside chokes where monitoring for sound and vibration can be carried out in a relatively straightforward manner, noise and vibration monitoring is not easily executed subsea, which means that the estimate of the generated noise needs to be calculated, or extrapolated in some way from lab data.\n Computational methods to validate designs often provide an alternative method to physical validation testing when size or recreating particular environments are impractical. However, to be able to use computational analysis for this purpose, it is essential to ensure that a sound and benchmarked methodology is applied. This paper discusses an optimized methodology that combines Computational Aeroacoustics and IEC 60534-8-3 for the estimation of the internal sound pressure level (SPL) generated by choke valves.\n Three broad types of tools (all broadband models) are available to estimate hydrodynamic induced SPL, namely: 1) one-way coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), 2) acoustic solvers, 3) two-way coupled CFD and acoustic solvers, also called Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) solvers. Out of these three types, CAA accounts for both the geometry of the equipment generating the internal SPL, but also models the complex interaction between hydrodynamics and acoustics, including tones generated by cavities. While the advantage in terms of output is significant, CAA comes at a large computational cost due to the requirements in space and time discretization that must be satisfied to properly resolve the frequency range from 12.5 Hz to 20 kHz.\n The CAA methodology presented in this paper is validated against two sets of data obtained in laboratory conditions for Mach numbers ranging from 0.08 to 0.36. Then the same methodology is applied to the specific design of the choke valve. The obtained outputs in form of an acoustical efficiency and peak frequency are then used to tune the IEC 60534-8-3 method, this allows accurate estimation of internal SPL for the given geometry. The combination of the CAA and IEC enables efficient consideration of the actual geometry of the choke with regards to internal SPL prediction against a wider range of conditions without requiring a larger set CAA calculations.\n The methodology presented in this paper can be applied to similar problems ensuring faster and more accurate results compared to the other available industry practices like physical testing.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31614-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsea chokes differ from the standard choke designs that can be found in for example the IEC 60534-8-3 standard, due to their geometry but also due to the environment. Contrary to topside chokes where monitoring for sound and vibration can be carried out in a relatively straightforward manner, noise and vibration monitoring is not easily executed subsea, which means that the estimate of the generated noise needs to be calculated, or extrapolated in some way from lab data. Computational methods to validate designs often provide an alternative method to physical validation testing when size or recreating particular environments are impractical. However, to be able to use computational analysis for this purpose, it is essential to ensure that a sound and benchmarked methodology is applied. This paper discusses an optimized methodology that combines Computational Aeroacoustics and IEC 60534-8-3 for the estimation of the internal sound pressure level (SPL) generated by choke valves. Three broad types of tools (all broadband models) are available to estimate hydrodynamic induced SPL, namely: 1) one-way coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), 2) acoustic solvers, 3) two-way coupled CFD and acoustic solvers, also called Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) solvers. Out of these three types, CAA accounts for both the geometry of the equipment generating the internal SPL, but also models the complex interaction between hydrodynamics and acoustics, including tones generated by cavities. While the advantage in terms of output is significant, CAA comes at a large computational cost due to the requirements in space and time discretization that must be satisfied to properly resolve the frequency range from 12.5 Hz to 20 kHz. The CAA methodology presented in this paper is validated against two sets of data obtained in laboratory conditions for Mach numbers ranging from 0.08 to 0.36. Then the same methodology is applied to the specific design of the choke valve. The obtained outputs in form of an acoustical efficiency and peak frequency are then used to tune the IEC 60534-8-3 method, this allows accurate estimation of internal SPL for the given geometry. The combination of the CAA and IEC enables efficient consideration of the actual geometry of the choke with regards to internal SPL prediction against a wider range of conditions without requiring a larger set CAA calculations. The methodology presented in this paper can be applied to similar problems ensuring faster and more accurate results compared to the other available industry practices like physical testing.
考虑设计的计算气动声学内声压级估算
海底扼流圈与IEC 60534-8-3标准中的标准扼流圈设计不同,不仅是由于其几何形状,而且还与环境有关。与可以相对直接地对声音和振动进行监测的上层节流装置不同,水下的噪声和振动监测并不容易进行,这意味着需要计算产生的噪声的估计,或者以某种方式从实验室数据中推断。当尺寸或重新创建特定环境不切实际时,验证设计的计算方法通常提供物理验证测试的替代方法。然而,为了能够将计算分析用于此目的,必须确保应用了可靠的基准方法。本文讨论了一种结合计算气动声学和IEC 60534-8-3的优化方法,用于估计由节流阀产生的内部声压级(SPL)。有三种类型的工具(所有宽带模型)可用于估计水动力诱导声压级,即:1)单向耦合计算流体动力学(CFD), 2)声学求解器,3)双向耦合CFD和声学求解器,也称为计算气动声学(CAA)求解器。在这三种类型中,CAA既考虑了产生内部声压级的设备的几何形状,也模拟了流体力学和声学之间复杂的相互作用,包括由空腔产生的音调。虽然在输出方面的优势是显著的,但CAA的计算成本很高,因为必须满足空间和时间离散化的要求,才能正确地解析12.5 Hz到20 kHz的频率范围。本文提出的CAA方法在实验室条件下对马赫数范围为0.08至0.36的两组数据进行了验证。然后将同样的方法应用到节流阀的具体设计中。以声效率和峰值频率形式获得的输出然后用于调整IEC 60534-8-3方法,这允许对给定几何形状的内部声压级进行准确估计。CAA和IEC的结合可以有效地考虑扼流圈的实际几何形状,在更广泛的条件下进行内部声压级预测,而不需要更大的CAA计算集。与其他可用的行业实践(如物理测试)相比,本文提出的方法可以应用于类似的问题,确保更快、更准确的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信