Targeting Asymptomatic Term and Late Preterm Newborns at Risk forEarly Sepsis: C Reactive Protein 20mg/L Threshold

Margarida Ejarque-Albuquerque, Graça Oliveira, T. Santos, D. Rebelo, C. Moniz, T. Rodrigues
{"title":"Targeting Asymptomatic Term and Late Preterm Newborns at Risk forEarly Sepsis: C Reactive Protein 20mg/L Threshold","authors":"Margarida Ejarque-Albuquerque, Graça Oliveira, T. Santos, D. Rebelo, C. Moniz, T. Rodrigues","doi":"10.2174/1874309901206010038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identification of sepsis is a major issue due to limitations in diagnosis and severity of outcome. Different combinations of tests are used to screen babies at risk for infection, none specific enough to avoid treatment of non- infected newborns. 193 newborns with � 35 weeks of gestational age admitted in the maternity were screened for infection using a protocol scoring system involving haematological values and CRP � 10mg/l. Blood-cultures were taken after treatment decision, before antibiotics were started. No microbiological exam was included in the screening. Treatment decisions were taken by the staff irrespectively of the ongoing observational study. Newborns were classified by the authors in 4 groups: infected (culture verified), strongly suspected infection (SSI), no sepsis but treated (NST), no sepsis-no treatment (NSNT). Treatment decision was revaluated by the authors according to different cut-off levels of CRP. 40 newborns (20.7%) received antibiotics. 2 had positive blood-cultures. 13 were classified as SSI (all treated) and 178 as not infected (25 treated). All infected babies were identified but the error of the positive predictive value reached 62.5%. Revaluation of treatment decisions with CRP cut-off levels of 15, 20 and 25 mg/l showed respectively 60.5%, 51.6 and 48% of error of the positive predictive value, the first two cut-offs missing no infected newborns but the last one missing two. A new scoring system including CRP at 20mg/l has been in use since then without readmissions for infection and an estimated reduction of 24% antibiotic treatment.","PeriodicalId":89037,"journal":{"name":"The open pediatric medicine journal","volume":"57 4 1","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open pediatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874309901206010038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identification of sepsis is a major issue due to limitations in diagnosis and severity of outcome. Different combinations of tests are used to screen babies at risk for infection, none specific enough to avoid treatment of non- infected newborns. 193 newborns with � 35 weeks of gestational age admitted in the maternity were screened for infection using a protocol scoring system involving haematological values and CRP � 10mg/l. Blood-cultures were taken after treatment decision, before antibiotics were started. No microbiological exam was included in the screening. Treatment decisions were taken by the staff irrespectively of the ongoing observational study. Newborns were classified by the authors in 4 groups: infected (culture verified), strongly suspected infection (SSI), no sepsis but treated (NST), no sepsis-no treatment (NSNT). Treatment decision was revaluated by the authors according to different cut-off levels of CRP. 40 newborns (20.7%) received antibiotics. 2 had positive blood-cultures. 13 were classified as SSI (all treated) and 178 as not infected (25 treated). All infected babies were identified but the error of the positive predictive value reached 62.5%. Revaluation of treatment decisions with CRP cut-off levels of 15, 20 and 25 mg/l showed respectively 60.5%, 51.6 and 48% of error of the positive predictive value, the first two cut-offs missing no infected newborns but the last one missing two. A new scoring system including CRP at 20mg/l has been in use since then without readmissions for infection and an estimated reduction of 24% antibiotic treatment.
针对有早期脓毒症风险的无症状足月和晚期早产儿:C反应蛋白20mg/L阈值
由于诊断的局限性和结果的严重性,脓毒症的鉴定是一个主要问题。不同的检测组合被用来筛查有感染风险的婴儿,但没有一种检测的特异性足以避免对未感染的新生儿进行治疗。采用血液学指标和CRP - 10mg/l的方案评分系统对产妇入院的193例35周孕龄新生儿进行感染筛查。在决定治疗后,在开始使用抗生素之前进行血培养。筛查中不包括微生物学检查。治疗决定由工作人员做出,与正在进行的观察性研究无关。作者将新生儿分为4组:感染(培养证实)、强烈怀疑感染(SSI)、未脓毒症治疗(NST)、未脓毒症不治疗(NSNT)。根据不同的CRP临界值,作者重新评估治疗方案。40名新生儿(20.7%)接受抗生素治疗。2例血培养阳性。13例为SSI(全部治疗),178例为未感染(25例治疗)。所有感染婴儿均被识别,阳性预测值误差达62.5%。对CRP临界值为15、20、25 mg/l的治疗决策进行重估,阳性预测值的误差率分别为60.5%、51.6、48%,前两个临界值未遗漏感染新生儿,后两个临界值遗漏2例。从那时起,一种新的评分系统开始使用,包括20mg/l的CRP,没有因感染再入院,估计抗生素治疗减少了24%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信