On the Inclusion of “Other” Women: Women and Race in the Early Modernities

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sara Vicuña Guengerich
{"title":"On the Inclusion of “Other” Women: Women and Race in the Early Modernities","authors":"Sara Vicuña Guengerich","doi":"10.1086/720938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The time frame that spans the late medieval period to the end of the dominance of European imperial powers in the Americas is complex, and that complexity demands scholars employ global and decolonial analytical frameworks. Thus, rather than referring to this era as “the early modern period,”which invokes the supremacy of Western societies, I will refer to it as “the early modernities” to insist on the simultaneity of transformations and individual experiences around the world. This turn to the pluralization of modernity, otherwise known as the early modern global, is now well on its way, and while it allows the disruption of chronological, disciplinary, and cultural boundaries, it still lacks the contributions of women of color to its complexities. Although feminist scholars have advanced our knowledge of women in the early modernities, the tendency to highlight only influential European women is still prevalent. This type of scholarship admittedly bypasses questions of race and assumes a common history of marginalization.Writing from the vantage point of a global modern world, with the intention of opening new non-Eurocentric perspectives, we should not miss the opportunity to write about Indigenous, Black, and other women of color in the earlymodernities. Researching about these women is not an easy task, as records about them are often incomplete and require a painstaking reconstruction of their social relationships. Yet, it is also a gratifying","PeriodicalId":41850,"journal":{"name":"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":"79 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The time frame that spans the late medieval period to the end of the dominance of European imperial powers in the Americas is complex, and that complexity demands scholars employ global and decolonial analytical frameworks. Thus, rather than referring to this era as “the early modern period,”which invokes the supremacy of Western societies, I will refer to it as “the early modernities” to insist on the simultaneity of transformations and individual experiences around the world. This turn to the pluralization of modernity, otherwise known as the early modern global, is now well on its way, and while it allows the disruption of chronological, disciplinary, and cultural boundaries, it still lacks the contributions of women of color to its complexities. Although feminist scholars have advanced our knowledge of women in the early modernities, the tendency to highlight only influential European women is still prevalent. This type of scholarship admittedly bypasses questions of race and assumes a common history of marginalization.Writing from the vantage point of a global modern world, with the intention of opening new non-Eurocentric perspectives, we should not miss the opportunity to write about Indigenous, Black, and other women of color in the earlymodernities. Researching about these women is not an easy task, as records about them are often incomplete and require a painstaking reconstruction of their social relationships. Yet, it is also a gratifying
论“他者”女性的包容:早期现代性中的女性与种族
从中世纪晚期到欧洲帝国主义列强在美洲的统治结束,这段时间是复杂的,这种复杂性要求学者们采用全球和非殖民化的分析框架。因此,我不把这个时代称为“早期现代时期”,因为它唤起了西方社会的至高无上的地位,我将把它称为“早期现代性”,以坚持世界各地的变革和个人经历的同时性。这种现代性多元化的转变,也被称为早期现代全球化,现在正在顺利进行,尽管它允许时间、学科和文化界限的破坏,但它仍然缺乏有色人种女性对其复杂性的贡献。虽然女权主义学者提高了我们对早期现代女性的认识,但只强调有影响力的欧洲女性的倾向仍然普遍存在。诚然,这种类型的奖学金绕过了种族问题,并假设了一种共同的边缘化历史。站在全球现代世界的有利位置写作,以打开新的非欧洲中心的视角,我们不应该错过写早期现代性中的土著、黑人和其他有色人种女性的机会。研究这些女性并不是一件容易的事,因为关于她们的记录往往是不完整的,需要艰苦地重建她们的社会关系。然而,这也是一件可喜的事
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal
Early Modern Women-An Interdisciplinary Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信