To Believe and to Govern or the Oikonomic Sense of the Image of Power

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Anastasis Pub Date : 2019-05-30 DOI:10.35218/ARMCA.2019.1.04
Laura Mesina
{"title":"To Believe and to Govern or the Oikonomic Sense of the Image of Power","authors":"Laura Mesina","doi":"10.35218/ARMCA.2019.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The medieval imaginary emerged as a corpus of discursive formations, which do not always have a strictly Byzantine source. Some elements of ethics and justice, of social organization or relationship between the perceptible and the non-perceptible, of understanding the divine and correlation with ethical faith and duty, have their roots in the philosophical imaginary of the ancient political system, the first system that aimed at the construction of a model of civic society. The ′′inheritance′′ at the level of the collective imaginary is, thus, not only Christian, but also ancient. Without having established an unmediated scientific relationship with the ancient texts whence the philosophical imaginary of the political can be extracted the medieval Romanian power followed the natural community formation routes, which were derived from a social model. This type of organization was re-interpreted by the philosophers of Christian power and theologically included in the oikonomic plan. The practical interpretation given by Romanian lawmakers to some of the post-Byzantine political ideas aimed at an adaptation of those discursive formations, which governed the trans-state collective imaginary in the area of influence of the empire. The Romanian imaginary itself will spring from these intersections between a normal line of socio-economic coalescence and a political plan for the formation of a state unit with its own acknowledged ′′national′′ identity, under the influence of the ′′basileic chimera′′. Finally, the ′′history of the imperial idea for the Romanians will be that of a compromise between a political ideal and practical realities′′.","PeriodicalId":37287,"journal":{"name":"Anastasis","volume":"0 0 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35218/ARMCA.2019.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medieval imaginary emerged as a corpus of discursive formations, which do not always have a strictly Byzantine source. Some elements of ethics and justice, of social organization or relationship between the perceptible and the non-perceptible, of understanding the divine and correlation with ethical faith and duty, have their roots in the philosophical imaginary of the ancient political system, the first system that aimed at the construction of a model of civic society. The ′′inheritance′′ at the level of the collective imaginary is, thus, not only Christian, but also ancient. Without having established an unmediated scientific relationship with the ancient texts whence the philosophical imaginary of the political can be extracted the medieval Romanian power followed the natural community formation routes, which were derived from a social model. This type of organization was re-interpreted by the philosophers of Christian power and theologically included in the oikonomic plan. The practical interpretation given by Romanian lawmakers to some of the post-Byzantine political ideas aimed at an adaptation of those discursive formations, which governed the trans-state collective imaginary in the area of influence of the empire. The Romanian imaginary itself will spring from these intersections between a normal line of socio-economic coalescence and a political plan for the formation of a state unit with its own acknowledged ′′national′′ identity, under the influence of the ′′basileic chimera′′. Finally, the ′′history of the imperial idea for the Romanians will be that of a compromise between a political ideal and practical realities′′.
相信和统治:权力形象的经济学意义
中世纪的想象是作为一个语料库出现的,这些语料库并不总是有严格的拜占庭来源。伦理与正义、社会组织或可感知与不可感知之间的关系、对神性的理解以及与伦理信仰和责任的关联等一些要素,都植根于古代政治体系的哲学想象,这是旨在构建公民社会模式的第一个体系。因此,集体想象层面的“继承”不仅是基督教的,而且是古老的。没有与古代文本建立直接的科学关系,从中可以提取政治的哲学想象,中世纪的罗马尼亚权力遵循自然的社区形成路线,这源于社会模式。这种类型的组织被基督教权力哲学家重新解释,并在神学上包括在经济计划中。罗马尼亚立法者对一些后拜占庭政治思想的实际解释,旨在适应那些在帝国影响范围内统治跨国家集体想象的话语结构。罗马尼亚人的想象本身将在社会经济融合的正常路线和政治计划之间的交叉点产生,在“基塞勒奇美拉”的影响下,形成一个拥有自己公认的“民族”身份的国家单位。最后,“对罗马尼亚人来说,帝国思想的历史将是政治理想与实际现实之间的妥协”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anastasis
Anastasis Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信