{"title":"A novel modification in combined Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy for posterior repositioning of the maxilla","authors":"Izumi Yoshioka , Amit Khanal , Masaaki Kodama , Manabu Habu , Takeshi Nishikawa , Kenjiro Iwanaga , Shinya Kokuryo , Akihiko Basugi , Sumio Sakoda , Jinichi Fukuda , Kazuhiro Tominaga","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoms.2011.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Posterior repositioning of the maxilla using a novel modification in combined Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy in bimaxillary surgeries is described and assessed for accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this prospective study, posterior repositioning of maxilla was performed in a total of 10 patients where the planned posterior setback was at least 3<!--> <!-->mm or greater. In all patients, the maxilla was first osteotomized with Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy in addition to a new technique to trim maxillary tuberosity and posterior palatal walls, and followed by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the mandible with or without additional genioplasty. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively. The changes in upper incisor (U1) and upper molar mesial cusp tip (UMT) were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The discrepancy between the planned and actual posterior movement was 0.35 and 0.28<!--> <!-->mm at U1 and UMT, respectively. There were no severe complications such as intraoperative haemorrhage, avascular necrosis of the maxilla (partial/total), devitalization of teeth, and oroantral or oronasal fistulas in any of the cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that when greater posterior repositioning of the maxilla is indicated, this newly introduced novel modification in horseshoe osteotomy combined with Le Fort I osteotomy is an effective technique for safety and accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100128,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ajoms.2011.05.004","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0915699211000690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Objective
Posterior repositioning of the maxilla using a novel modification in combined Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy in bimaxillary surgeries is described and assessed for accuracy.
Materials and methods
In this prospective study, posterior repositioning of maxilla was performed in a total of 10 patients where the planned posterior setback was at least 3 mm or greater. In all patients, the maxilla was first osteotomized with Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy in addition to a new technique to trim maxillary tuberosity and posterior palatal walls, and followed by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the mandible with or without additional genioplasty. Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively. The changes in upper incisor (U1) and upper molar mesial cusp tip (UMT) were examined.
Results
The discrepancy between the planned and actual posterior movement was 0.35 and 0.28 mm at U1 and UMT, respectively. There were no severe complications such as intraoperative haemorrhage, avascular necrosis of the maxilla (partial/total), devitalization of teeth, and oroantral or oronasal fistulas in any of the cases.
Conclusions
These results suggest that when greater posterior repositioning of the maxilla is indicated, this newly introduced novel modification in horseshoe osteotomy combined with Le Fort I osteotomy is an effective technique for safety and accuracy.
目的描述一种新型的Le Fort I联合马蹄截骨术在双颌手术中对上颌骨进行后路复位的方法,并对其准确性进行评估。材料和方法在这项前瞻性研究中,共对10例计划后侧后退至少3mm或更大的患者进行了上颌骨后侧复位。在所有患者中,首先采用Le Fort I和马蹄截骨术进行上颌截骨,并采用新技术修剪上颌结节和后腭壁,然后在下颌骨进行双侧矢状裂支截骨术,并有或没有额外的颏成形术。术前及术后1周分别行侧位头颅造影。观察上切牙(U1)和上磨牙近中尖尖(UMT)的变化。结果在U1和UMT时,计划和实际后侧活动的差异分别为0.35和0.28 mm。所有病例均无术中出血、上颌(部分/全部)无血管坏死、牙齿失活、口鼻口瘘等严重并发症。结论当需要对上颌骨进行更大的后侧复位时,采用新改良的马蹄形截骨术联合Le Fort I型截骨术是一种安全、准确的方法。