Impacts of Agricultural Management Practices on the Risk of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses at Catchment Scales by Using GIS and Index Models

Ping Zhang, Liang He, Tao Zhang, Peishu Huo
{"title":"Impacts of Agricultural Management Practices on the Risk of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses at Catchment Scales by Using GIS and Index Models","authors":"Ping Zhang, Liang He, Tao Zhang, Peishu Huo","doi":"10.2174/1874123101408010019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unreasonable agricultural management measure is the main cause of the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the impacts of agricultural management practices on the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses at catchment scales based on GIS and integrated index models. The results showed that 93.1% of the catchment was no risk and low risk area, while 6.9% for medium and high risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses. Spatial analysis of risk index indicated that different agricultural management practices lead to number and proportion of grids are different. At very high risk area, about 599 of grid number is only for the actual management practice, accounting for 0.22% of the total, while at very low risk area, 165884.00 and 60.51% for river buffer zone respectively. Control effect of different agricultural management practices for risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses is better, which very low and low risk areas of based fertilizer applied deeply and buffer zone construction accounted for 98% and 95.6%, and the control effect sorted as follows: base fertilizer applied deeply> construction of river buffer zone> reduced nitrogen application> reduced phosphorus application.","PeriodicalId":22933,"journal":{"name":"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874123101408010019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unreasonable agricultural management measure is the main cause of the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the impacts of agricultural management practices on the risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses at catchment scales based on GIS and integrated index models. The results showed that 93.1% of the catchment was no risk and low risk area, while 6.9% for medium and high risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses. Spatial analysis of risk index indicated that different agricultural management practices lead to number and proportion of grids are different. At very high risk area, about 599 of grid number is only for the actual management practice, accounting for 0.22% of the total, while at very low risk area, 165884.00 and 60.51% for river buffer zone respectively. Control effect of different agricultural management practices for risk of nitrogen and phosphorus losses is better, which very low and low risk areas of based fertilizer applied deeply and buffer zone construction accounted for 98% and 95.6%, and the control effect sorted as follows: base fertilizer applied deeply> construction of river buffer zone> reduced nitrogen application> reduced phosphorus application.
基于GIS和指数模型的农业管理措施对流域氮磷损失风险的影响
不合理的农业管理措施是造成氮磷素流失风险的主要原因。本文旨在基于GIS和综合指数模型,评价农业管理措施对流域氮磷损失风险的影响。结果表明:93.1%的流域为无风险区和低风险区,6.9%的流域为氮磷损失中高风险区。风险指数的空间分析表明,不同的农业经营方式导致栅格的数量和比例不同。在极高风险区,仅为实际管理实践的栅格数约为599个,占总栅格数的0.22%;在极低风险区,河流缓冲区栅格数分别为165884.00个和60.51%。不同农业管理方式对氮磷损失风险的控制效果较好,其中基肥深施和缓冲区建设的极低和低风险区分别占98%和95.6%,控制效果排序为:基肥深施>河流缓冲区建设>减量施氮>减量施磷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信