Current concepts of optical coherence tomography assessment of left main coronary artery during coronary interventions

S. Kasturi
{"title":"Current concepts of optical coherence tomography assessment of left main coronary artery during coronary interventions","authors":"S. Kasturi","doi":"10.4103/jicc.jicc_61_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional angiography is poor in assessing type of plaque, plaque volume, disease extent, severity and features associated with optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whereas Intra-Vascular Ultra-Sound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) overcome these limitations by providing cross sectional images of vessel wall, and longitudinal extent of disease. OCT provides high-resolution images at the cost of limited penetration compared with IVUS with an axial spatial resolution of 10–20 μm versus 100–200 μm, lateral resolution of 20 μm versus 200 μm, and penetration depth 1–2.5 mm versus 10 mm, respectively. OCT measurements were proved to be nearer to the actual luminal areas whereas IVUS measurements were overestimated and were less reproducible in the phantom model. OCT and IVUS are proved to be a valid guidance for optimization of PCI. However, usefulness of OCT in day to day practice is very limited in the assessment of Left Main disease. Both imaging technologies have different distinct features, these are complementary and should be opted carefully for each patient based on pros and cons, and clinical indications of each technique.","PeriodicalId":100789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian College of Cardiology","volume":"22 1","pages":"89 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jicc.jicc_61_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional angiography is poor in assessing type of plaque, plaque volume, disease extent, severity and features associated with optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whereas Intra-Vascular Ultra-Sound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) overcome these limitations by providing cross sectional images of vessel wall, and longitudinal extent of disease. OCT provides high-resolution images at the cost of limited penetration compared with IVUS with an axial spatial resolution of 10–20 μm versus 100–200 μm, lateral resolution of 20 μm versus 200 μm, and penetration depth 1–2.5 mm versus 10 mm, respectively. OCT measurements were proved to be nearer to the actual luminal areas whereas IVUS measurements were overestimated and were less reproducible in the phantom model. OCT and IVUS are proved to be a valid guidance for optimization of PCI. However, usefulness of OCT in day to day practice is very limited in the assessment of Left Main disease. Both imaging technologies have different distinct features, these are complementary and should be opted carefully for each patient based on pros and cons, and clinical indications of each technique.
冠状动脉介入治疗中左主干光学相干断层成像评估的现状
传统的血管造影在评估斑块类型、斑块体积、疾病程度、严重程度和与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)优化相关的特征方面很差,而血管内超声(IVUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)通过提供血管壁的横截面图像和疾病的纵向范围克服了这些局限性。与IVUS相比,OCT以有限的穿透为代价提供高分辨率图像,轴向空间分辨率分别为10 - 20 μm和100-200 μm,横向分辨率分别为20 μm和200 μm,穿透深度分别为1-2.5 mm和10 mm。OCT测量结果被证明更接近实际腔区,而IVUS测量结果被高估,并且在幻影模型中重现性较差。OCT和IVUS是PCI优化的有效指导。然而,在日常实践中,OCT在左主干疾病评估中的作用非常有限。两种成像技术都有不同的特点,它们是互补的,应该根据每种技术的优缺点和临床适应症为每个患者仔细选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信