UTJECAJI MNOŽINE VOLJA NA NASTANAK UPRAVNOG AKTA

{"title":"UTJECAJI MNOŽINE VOLJA NA NASTANAK\nUPRAVNOG AKTA","authors":"","doi":"10.51558/2712-1178.2022.8.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the authors consider the issue of the influence of the will of two or\nmore different entities in administrative decision-making and the emergence of an\nadministrative act. Namely, administrative bodies and institutions with public au-\nthorizations directly apply the regulations when deciding on the rights, obligations\nand legal interests of natural persons, legal entities or other parties in administrative\nmatters in administrative proceedings. These bodies are obliged to conduct admini-\nstrative proceedings and make decisions independently, within the powers determi-\nned by law and bylaws based on law.This procedure is led and authorized officials\nmake decisions in a specific body. The authorized official of the body responsible\nfor conducting the administrative procedure independently determines the facts and\ncircumstances, and based on such established facts and circumstances applies the\nregulations to the specific case. As a rule, the administrative procedure is carried\nout and the decision is made by an individual, be it the head of the administrative\nbody or another official who is specially authorized to do so. Rarely, administrative\nproceedings are conducted and administrative decisions are made by (1) two or more\nadministrative bodies, or (2) several persons in one administrative body. In the first\ncase, it is about the adoption of complex (collective) administrative acts, and in the\nsecond about the procedure of administrative decision-making of collegial bodies.\nIn both cases, the result of the administrative procedure is one, single administra-\ntive act which is the product of decision-making of a larger number of subjects. It\nis a specific result of a multitude of wills (either different administrative bodies, or\ndifferent authorized officials) that are translated into one, single act. Such a single\nadministrative act represents the will of the administrative body, not the persons\nwho passed it. The process of creating such an administrative act, in addition to the\nstandard processes of logical reasoning, necessarily requires an additional phase of harmonization of individual understandings of the specific (legal) situation by members of the collegial body and the phase of adopting a joint administrative act.","PeriodicalId":31614,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nisu","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nisu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/2712-1178.2022.8.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the authors consider the issue of the influence of the will of two or more different entities in administrative decision-making and the emergence of an administrative act. Namely, administrative bodies and institutions with public au- thorizations directly apply the regulations when deciding on the rights, obligations and legal interests of natural persons, legal entities or other parties in administrative matters in administrative proceedings. These bodies are obliged to conduct admini- strative proceedings and make decisions independently, within the powers determi- ned by law and bylaws based on law.This procedure is led and authorized officials make decisions in a specific body. The authorized official of the body responsible for conducting the administrative procedure independently determines the facts and circumstances, and based on such established facts and circumstances applies the regulations to the specific case. As a rule, the administrative procedure is carried out and the decision is made by an individual, be it the head of the administrative body or another official who is specially authorized to do so. Rarely, administrative proceedings are conducted and administrative decisions are made by (1) two or more administrative bodies, or (2) several persons in one administrative body. In the first case, it is about the adoption of complex (collective) administrative acts, and in the second about the procedure of administrative decision-making of collegial bodies. In both cases, the result of the administrative procedure is one, single administra- tive act which is the product of decision-making of a larger number of subjects. It is a specific result of a multitude of wills (either different administrative bodies, or different authorized officials) that are translated into one, single act. Such a single administrative act represents the will of the administrative body, not the persons who passed it. The process of creating such an administrative act, in addition to the standard processes of logical reasoning, necessarily requires an additional phase of harmonization of individual understandings of the specific (legal) situation by members of the collegial body and the phase of adopting a joint administrative act.
本文考虑了两个或两个以上不同主体的意志在行政决策中的影响以及行政行为的产生问题。即行政机关和具有公授权的事业单位在行政诉讼中对自然人、法人或者其他行政当事人的权利、义务和法律利益作出决定时,直接适用本法。这些机关有义务在法律和依法制定的规章规定的职权范围内,独立进行行政诉讼和作出行政决定。这一程序由一个特定的机构领导和授权官员作出决定。负责实施行政程序的机关的授权工作人员独立确定事实和情况,并根据已确定的事实和情况将规定适用于具体案件。通常,行政程序是由个人执行和作出决定的,无论是行政机构的负责人还是获得特别授权的其他官员。很少有行政诉讼和行政决定是由(1)两个或两个以上的行政机关,或(2)一个行政机关的几个人进行的。第一种情况是关于复杂(集体)行政行为的采用,第二种情况是关于合议庭行政决策的程序。在这两种情况下,行政程序的结果都是一个单一的行政行为,它是众多主体共同决策的产物。它是众多意志(不同的行政机构或不同的授权官员)转化为一个单一行为的具体结果。这样一个单一的行政行为代表了行政机构的意志,而不是通过它的人的意志。创建这样一个行政行为的过程,除了标准的逻辑推理过程之外,必然需要一个额外的阶段,即协调合议机构成员对具体(法律)情况的个人理解,并采取共同行政行为的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书