The association of dynapenia with whether participants were subject to long-term care prevention or not in the Japanese long-term care insurance system: A pilot study

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Masaki Iwamura, Suguru Ando, Yosuke Yamato, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Chikako Maeda, K. Shinbo, Wataru Nanikawa, Hitoshi Kumada
{"title":"The association of dynapenia with whether participants were subject to long-term care prevention or not in the Japanese long-term care insurance system: A pilot study","authors":"Masaki Iwamura, Suguru Ando, Yosuke Yamato, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Chikako Maeda, K. Shinbo, Wataru Nanikawa, Hitoshi Kumada","doi":"10.15563/jalliedhealthsci.13.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of dynapenia, determined by lower limb muscle strength, and sarcopenia with whether participants were subject to long-term care prevention (LCP) in the Japanese long-term care insurance system. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The participants were 108 older adults (78.1±7.1 years, male=20), including 45 older adults who were subject to LCP (82.8±5.4 years, male=6) and 63 healthy older adults (74.7±6.2 years, male=14). Age, sex and comorbidities were collected as basic information. Height, weight, and muscle mass were measured as body composition, and grip strength, lower limb muscle strength, and gait speed were measured as physical functions. Sarcopenia was determined according to the definition of Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019. Dynapenia was determined using lower limb muscle strength. For the statistical analysis, the analysis was divided into two groups according to whether participants were subject to LCP or not. Next, we divided the participants into two groups, sarcopenia and dynapenia, and compared their physical characteristics and classification of LCP. Lastly, we used logistic regression analysis with dynapenia and sarcopenia as independent variables; age and gender as adjustment factors, and whether to undergo LCP as the dependent variable. Results: Dynapenia and sarcopenia were present in 17% and 26% of the participants. As a result of examining the association of dynapenia and sarcopenia with whether participants were subject to LCP or not, only dynapenia was found to be a significantly related factor (odds ratio: 4.6, P value: 0.025). Conclusion: Dynapenia was more closely related to whether participants were subject to LCP or not than sarcopenia. Submitted Sep. 17. 2021 Accepted Jan. 12. 2022 *Correspondence Masaki Iwamura, PT, PhD Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Aino University E-mail: m-iwamura@pt-u.aino.ac.jp","PeriodicalId":45065,"journal":{"name":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15563/jalliedhealthsci.13.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of dynapenia, determined by lower limb muscle strength, and sarcopenia with whether participants were subject to long-term care prevention (LCP) in the Japanese long-term care insurance system. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. The participants were 108 older adults (78.1±7.1 years, male=20), including 45 older adults who were subject to LCP (82.8±5.4 years, male=6) and 63 healthy older adults (74.7±6.2 years, male=14). Age, sex and comorbidities were collected as basic information. Height, weight, and muscle mass were measured as body composition, and grip strength, lower limb muscle strength, and gait speed were measured as physical functions. Sarcopenia was determined according to the definition of Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia in 2019. Dynapenia was determined using lower limb muscle strength. For the statistical analysis, the analysis was divided into two groups according to whether participants were subject to LCP or not. Next, we divided the participants into two groups, sarcopenia and dynapenia, and compared their physical characteristics and classification of LCP. Lastly, we used logistic regression analysis with dynapenia and sarcopenia as independent variables; age and gender as adjustment factors, and whether to undergo LCP as the dependent variable. Results: Dynapenia and sarcopenia were present in 17% and 26% of the participants. As a result of examining the association of dynapenia and sarcopenia with whether participants were subject to LCP or not, only dynapenia was found to be a significantly related factor (odds ratio: 4.6, P value: 0.025). Conclusion: Dynapenia was more closely related to whether participants were subject to LCP or not than sarcopenia. Submitted Sep. 17. 2021 Accepted Jan. 12. 2022 *Correspondence Masaki Iwamura, PT, PhD Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Aino University E-mail: m-iwamura@pt-u.aino.ac.jp
日本长期护理保险制度中,运动障碍与受试者是否接受长期护理预防的关系:一项试点研究
目的:本研究的目的是调查动力不足(由下肢肌肉力量决定)和肌肉减少症与参与者是否在日本长期护理保险体系中接受长期护理预防(LCP)的关系。方法:采用横断面研究。研究对象为老年人108例(78.1±7.1岁,男=20),其中LCP组老年人45例(82.8±5.4岁,男=6),健康老年人63例(74.7±6.2岁,男=14)。收集年龄、性别和合并症作为基本信息。测量身高、体重和肌肉质量作为身体组成,测量握力、下肢肌肉力量和步态速度作为身体功能。肌少症是根据2019年亚洲肌少症工作组的定义确定的。用下肢肌力测定运动障碍。为了进行统计分析,根据受试者是否接受LCP,将分析分为两组。接下来,我们将参与者分为肌肉减少症和动力减少症两组,比较他们的身体特征和LCP的分类。最后,我们使用logistic回归分析,以动力不足和肌肉减少症为自变量;年龄、性别为调整因素,是否接受LCP为因变量。结果:17%和26%的参与者存在动力不足和肌肉减少症。通过检查运动障碍和肌肉减少症与参与者是否接受LCP的关系,发现只有运动障碍是一个显著相关因素(优势比:4.6,P值:0.025)。结论:与肌少症相比,动力不足与LCP是否存在更密切的关系。9月17日提交。2021年1月12日录取。2022 *通信Masaki Iwamura, PT,博士爱野大学健康科学学院物理治疗系E-mail: m-iwamura@pt-u.aino.ac.jp
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信