Kimiya Rahmani Mokarrari, S. Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, T. Sowlati, Shaghayegh Akhtari, Krishna Teja Malladi, F. Mirza
{"title":"Techno-economic analysis of biofuel production from construction and demolition wood waste","authors":"Kimiya Rahmani Mokarrari, S. Aghamohamadi-Bosjin, T. Sowlati, Shaghayegh Akhtari, Krishna Teja Malladi, F. Mirza","doi":"10.1080/15567249.2022.2163723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increase in the amount of waste generated from construction and demolition (C&D) has raised concerns regarding landfill space and greenhouse gas emissions. One of the waste management practices that can remedy these issues is to convert the C&D wood waste into biofuel. The technical aspects, environmental benefits, and economic feasibility of such a practice may vary from one case to another and should be evaluated before implementation. In this study, techno-economic feasibility of establishing a biofuel production plant, which uses C&D wood waste delivered to the City of Vancouver (CoV)’s landfill in British Columbia, Canada is conducted. In addition, the GHG emission reduction of biofuel production compared with landfilling the C&D wood waste is investigated. According to the results, the average GHG emissions from landfilling all the waste is 24,350 tonnes of CO2 eq. while the emissions from biofuel production are 11,156 and 10,539 tonnes CO2 eq. for the biofuel production plant using diesel-based and electric-based equipment pieces, respectively. The GHG emission reductions are then monetized and included in the economic analysis. Results indicate that biofuel production is economically feasible only if the impacts of GHG emission reduction are considered. Moreover, sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses are performed on financial parameters, wood waste supply, biofuel demand, plant capacity, and plant ownership schemes. Based on these analyses, the biofuel selling price is the most impactful financial parameter on the outcome of economic feasibility. A 50% change in the biofuel selling price results in 42% and 45% change in NPV of the project for diesel-based and electric-based equipment, respectively. Furthermore, the ownership scheme, where CoV and a partner split the ownership and the partner operates the plant is the best option, with a net present value of more than $69 million.","PeriodicalId":51247,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2022.2163723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT The increase in the amount of waste generated from construction and demolition (C&D) has raised concerns regarding landfill space and greenhouse gas emissions. One of the waste management practices that can remedy these issues is to convert the C&D wood waste into biofuel. The technical aspects, environmental benefits, and economic feasibility of such a practice may vary from one case to another and should be evaluated before implementation. In this study, techno-economic feasibility of establishing a biofuel production plant, which uses C&D wood waste delivered to the City of Vancouver (CoV)’s landfill in British Columbia, Canada is conducted. In addition, the GHG emission reduction of biofuel production compared with landfilling the C&D wood waste is investigated. According to the results, the average GHG emissions from landfilling all the waste is 24,350 tonnes of CO2 eq. while the emissions from biofuel production are 11,156 and 10,539 tonnes CO2 eq. for the biofuel production plant using diesel-based and electric-based equipment pieces, respectively. The GHG emission reductions are then monetized and included in the economic analysis. Results indicate that biofuel production is economically feasible only if the impacts of GHG emission reduction are considered. Moreover, sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses are performed on financial parameters, wood waste supply, biofuel demand, plant capacity, and plant ownership schemes. Based on these analyses, the biofuel selling price is the most impactful financial parameter on the outcome of economic feasibility. A 50% change in the biofuel selling price results in 42% and 45% change in NPV of the project for diesel-based and electric-based equipment, respectively. Furthermore, the ownership scheme, where CoV and a partner split the ownership and the partner operates the plant is the best option, with a net present value of more than $69 million.
期刊介绍:
12 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: Applied Science & Technology Index; API Abstracts/Literature; Automatic Subject Index Citation; BIOSIS Previews; Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance; Chemical Abstracts; CSA Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts; CSA Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database; CSA Pollution Abstracts; Current Contents/Engineering, Technology & Applied Sciences; Directory of Industry Data Sources; Economic Abstracts; Electrical and Electronics Abstracts; Energy Information Abstracts; Energy Research Abstracts; Engineering Index Monthly; Environmental Abstracts; Environmental Periodicals Bibliography (EPB); International Abstracts in Operations Research; Operations/Research/Management Science Abstracts; Petroleum Abstracts; Physikalische Berichte; and Science Citation Index.
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in our publications. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor & Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to, or arising out of the use of the Content. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions .