An integrated MCDM approach for evaluating the Ro-Ro marine port selection process: a case study in black Sea region

Ö. F. Görçün, H. Küçükönder
{"title":"An integrated MCDM approach for evaluating the Ro-Ro marine port selection process: a case study in black Sea region","authors":"Ö. F. Görçün, H. Küçükönder","doi":"10.1080/18366503.2021.1878872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Selection of the appropriate Roll-on Roll-off (Ro-Ro) port is one of the crucial tasks for the maritime industry. Because there are many factors affecting the selection process, this selection process is essentially a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper proposes a integrated approach consisting of the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) technique and the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method to evaluate the Ro-Ro marine ports selection. The obtained results by using the proposed model have been verified carrying out a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. In accordance with this purpose, 10 different scenarios were established and five MCDM methods were applied to make a comparison. Results obtained using the suggested model were verified in dynamic conditions. The main purpose of this implementation is to determine whether any change in the obtained results for each determined scenario. Carried out sensitivity analysis shows that the suggested hybrid MCDM model consisting of CRITIC and EDAS techniques has validity and the obtained results are accurate and realistic. When the results of the sensitivity analysis are reviewed, it can be seen that the P1 option is the best alternative for all scenarios.","PeriodicalId":37179,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","volume":"47 1","pages":"203 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1878872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Selection of the appropriate Roll-on Roll-off (Ro-Ro) port is one of the crucial tasks for the maritime industry. Because there are many factors affecting the selection process, this selection process is essentially a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper proposes a integrated approach consisting of the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) technique and the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method to evaluate the Ro-Ro marine ports selection. The obtained results by using the proposed model have been verified carrying out a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. In accordance with this purpose, 10 different scenarios were established and five MCDM methods were applied to make a comparison. Results obtained using the suggested model were verified in dynamic conditions. The main purpose of this implementation is to determine whether any change in the obtained results for each determined scenario. Carried out sensitivity analysis shows that the suggested hybrid MCDM model consisting of CRITIC and EDAS techniques has validity and the obtained results are accurate and realistic. When the results of the sensitivity analysis are reviewed, it can be seen that the P1 option is the best alternative for all scenarios.
评估滚装海运港口选择过程的综合MCDM方法:黑海地区的案例研究
选择合适的滚装滚装(Ro-Ro)港口是海事行业的关键任务之一。因为影响选择过程的因素很多,所以这个选择过程本质上是一个多准则决策问题。本文提出了一种综合评价滚装港口选择的方法,该方法由critical (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation)技术和EDAS (Evaluation based from Average Solution)方法组成。利用该模型得到的结果进行了综合敏感性分析,并得到了验证。为此,我们建立了10个不同的场景,并采用5种MCDM方法进行比较。采用该模型得到的结果在动态条件下得到了验证。此实现的主要目的是确定对于每个确定的场景所获得的结果是否有任何更改。灵敏度分析表明,本文提出的由CRITIC和EDAS技术组成的混合MCDM模型是有效的,所得结果准确、真实。当审查敏感性分析的结果时,可以看到P1选项是所有方案的最佳替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信