The Path of Friction

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
P. Zurn
{"title":"The Path of Friction","authors":"P. Zurn","doi":"10.1215/23289252-10273252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article takes the twenty-five-year anniversary of C. Jacob Hale's “Suggested Rules for Non-transsexuals Writing about Transsexuals, Transsexuality, Transsexualism, and Trans___” (1997) to reflect on the nature of accountability to and within trans communities. Against the backdrop of interviews with Hale and his thought partners for the piece (e.g., Talia Bettcher, Jack Halberstam, and Naomi Scheman), Zurn draws out the historical context of the “Rules,” but also the affective, theoretical, and political frictions (and intimacies) that underlie them. Generated in the late 1990s scene of trans theory and activism, Hale's “Rules” were more than a corrective to cis-centric “positions” on trans people circulating at the time (esp. by Bernice Hausman); they were also a testament to friendship, as well as to the philosophical insights of María Lugones, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sandy Stone. Although written for non-trans writers, it was Hale's intention that the “Rules” also apply in trans-trans contexts. Indeed, in a world today where trans people are in fact leading trans studies, Hale's injunctions to humility in our approach to trans* peoples and to faith in the existing wisdom of trans life is prescient. So is his invitation to theorize on the rough ground of living and struggling together.","PeriodicalId":44767,"journal":{"name":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-10273252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article takes the twenty-five-year anniversary of C. Jacob Hale's “Suggested Rules for Non-transsexuals Writing about Transsexuals, Transsexuality, Transsexualism, and Trans___” (1997) to reflect on the nature of accountability to and within trans communities. Against the backdrop of interviews with Hale and his thought partners for the piece (e.g., Talia Bettcher, Jack Halberstam, and Naomi Scheman), Zurn draws out the historical context of the “Rules,” but also the affective, theoretical, and political frictions (and intimacies) that underlie them. Generated in the late 1990s scene of trans theory and activism, Hale's “Rules” were more than a corrective to cis-centric “positions” on trans people circulating at the time (esp. by Bernice Hausman); they were also a testament to friendship, as well as to the philosophical insights of María Lugones, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Sandy Stone. Although written for non-trans writers, it was Hale's intention that the “Rules” also apply in trans-trans contexts. Indeed, in a world today where trans people are in fact leading trans studies, Hale's injunctions to humility in our approach to trans* peoples and to faith in the existing wisdom of trans life is prescient. So is his invitation to theorize on the rough ground of living and struggling together.
摩擦的路径
本文以C. Jacob Hale的《关于变性人、变性人、易性癖和跨性别写作的非变性人建议规则》(1997)发表25周年为契机,反思对跨性别群体和跨性别群体的责任本质。在采访黑尔和他的思想伙伴(如塔利亚·贝彻、杰克·哈伯斯坦和娜奥米·Scheman)的背景下,泽恩勾勒出了“规则”的历史背景,以及它们背后的情感、理论和政治摩擦(和亲密关系)。黑尔的“规则”产生于20世纪90年代后期的跨性别理论和行动主义,它不仅仅是对当时流传的以顺式为中心的跨性别者“立场”的纠正(尤其是伯尼斯·豪斯曼的观点);它们也是友谊的证明,也是María卢戈内斯、路德维希·维特根斯坦和桑迪·斯通的哲学见解的证明。虽然《规则》是为非跨性别作家写的,但黑尔的意图是让《规则》也适用于跨性别语境。的确,在当今世界,跨性别者实际上是跨性别研究的领导者,黑尔告诫我们在对待跨性别者时要保持谦逊,并对现有的跨性别生活智慧抱有信心,这是有先见之明的。因此,他邀请人们在共同生活和奋斗的粗糙基础上进行理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly
TSQ-Transgender Studies Quarterly SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
28.60%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信