Kamaljit Singh, Raju Paul, F. Kamal, Ousama Takeiddine
{"title":"Gap Analysis on MEES Execution","authors":"Kamaljit Singh, Raju Paul, F. Kamal, Ousama Takeiddine","doi":"10.2118/207540-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Main Electrical Equipment Supplier (MEES) concept has been adopted on mega projects to facilitate overall electrical power system integration and standardization of items/systems within an EPC package as well as across multiple EPC packages and to avoid interface issues. A gap analysis has been performed in this paper based on experience on recent projects and recommendations are proposed as mitigation measures which will benefit Clients, Suppliers as well as FEED/EPC CONTRACTORs.\n Challenges faced during execution are categorized based on type as well as execution stages. Paper focusses on the major items to be defined as part of the frame agreement during MEES selection to minimize conflicts and issues later on. MEES package pricing (including material, non-material items and services) is done based on agreed Price Book. Gaps are identified as part of this paper including the methodology for change management. Scope limitation is also discussed in detail with clear objective of minimal risk to all stakeholders. Timing and responsibility of MEES selection, that is critical on mega projects with multiple packages, has also been analyzed.\n Concept of MEES is highly recommended on projects that have complex electrical power system, projects involving multiple EPC CONTRACTORs and also on the projects that are fast track in nature. It has been observed that most projects these days fall into one of these two categories which makes this paper even more relevant. However, execution of MEES package has vast scope for improvement.\n As part of MEES selection, the following shall be agreed and established, as a minimum:\n Selected make & model list of all the components along with the unit rates as part of MEES frame agreement that acceptable on project. Price book including all the main equipment envisaged on the project fully complying with project requirements. Comprehensive technical deviations acceptance list as part of MEES frame agreement. Technical compliance certificate indicating Vendor's compliance on the latest revision of Specifications/Data Sheets/ drawings associated with MEES Material Requisition (MR).\n Price Book should be sufficiently comprehensive without gaps to avoid variations after award. Most common gaps are identified and discussed in detail in the paper. It is highly recommended to select MEES during FEED stage (prior to bidding stage) in order to take advantages in terms of project schedule, change management and overall cost optimization.\n MEES concept, if managed with recommendations in this paper, can benefit all stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":10967,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207540-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Main Electrical Equipment Supplier (MEES) concept has been adopted on mega projects to facilitate overall electrical power system integration and standardization of items/systems within an EPC package as well as across multiple EPC packages and to avoid interface issues. A gap analysis has been performed in this paper based on experience on recent projects and recommendations are proposed as mitigation measures which will benefit Clients, Suppliers as well as FEED/EPC CONTRACTORs.
Challenges faced during execution are categorized based on type as well as execution stages. Paper focusses on the major items to be defined as part of the frame agreement during MEES selection to minimize conflicts and issues later on. MEES package pricing (including material, non-material items and services) is done based on agreed Price Book. Gaps are identified as part of this paper including the methodology for change management. Scope limitation is also discussed in detail with clear objective of minimal risk to all stakeholders. Timing and responsibility of MEES selection, that is critical on mega projects with multiple packages, has also been analyzed.
Concept of MEES is highly recommended on projects that have complex electrical power system, projects involving multiple EPC CONTRACTORs and also on the projects that are fast track in nature. It has been observed that most projects these days fall into one of these two categories which makes this paper even more relevant. However, execution of MEES package has vast scope for improvement.
As part of MEES selection, the following shall be agreed and established, as a minimum:
Selected make & model list of all the components along with the unit rates as part of MEES frame agreement that acceptable on project. Price book including all the main equipment envisaged on the project fully complying with project requirements. Comprehensive technical deviations acceptance list as part of MEES frame agreement. Technical compliance certificate indicating Vendor's compliance on the latest revision of Specifications/Data Sheets/ drawings associated with MEES Material Requisition (MR).
Price Book should be sufficiently comprehensive without gaps to avoid variations after award. Most common gaps are identified and discussed in detail in the paper. It is highly recommended to select MEES during FEED stage (prior to bidding stage) in order to take advantages in terms of project schedule, change management and overall cost optimization.
MEES concept, if managed with recommendations in this paper, can benefit all stakeholders.