Environmental impact assessment of transport infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka: Way forward

I. Gamalath, L. Perera, S. Bandara
{"title":"Environmental impact assessment of transport infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka: Way forward","authors":"I. Gamalath, L. Perera, S. Bandara","doi":"10.31357/JTFE.V4I1.1833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was established to manage impacts on environment due to development projects and to enhance its quality where possible. However recent incidents concerning several projects have aroused the question, “Are we utilising EIA effectively?” Therefore this study was conducted to find possible methods of improving the quality and effectiveness of EIA. Literature regarding EIA process in both Sri Lankan context and international context was reviewed together with several past EIA reports related to Civil Engineering infrastructure projects to identify possible improvements. Identified problems can be categorised in to two; problems in established EIA framework, methodologies adopted in impact assessment. Main problems identified in the framework are the lack of, broad frameworks of environmental, social protection; accountability of EIA process; public participation and proper post monitoring system. The problems identified in the assessment process are the lack of incorporating cumulative effects and sustainability concepts. To address these issues, legislature should be improved and they should focus on allocating proper weight to the EIA findings in the decision process. Analysing impacts should focus more on concepts of environmental resources and limitations rather than narrow impacts of the project. Further in impact assessment the product of magnitude of the impact and the duration of impact should be taken into account rather than just focusing on the magnitude. In addition to the project based EIA process, Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) can be practised to overcome the weaknesses of the reactive nature of EIA and to direct development in the right direction. Keywords: Environmental impact assessment, Effectiveness, Assessment methodology","PeriodicalId":17445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Forestry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/JTFE.V4I1.1833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was established to manage impacts on environment due to development projects and to enhance its quality where possible. However recent incidents concerning several projects have aroused the question, “Are we utilising EIA effectively?” Therefore this study was conducted to find possible methods of improving the quality and effectiveness of EIA. Literature regarding EIA process in both Sri Lankan context and international context was reviewed together with several past EIA reports related to Civil Engineering infrastructure projects to identify possible improvements. Identified problems can be categorised in to two; problems in established EIA framework, methodologies adopted in impact assessment. Main problems identified in the framework are the lack of, broad frameworks of environmental, social protection; accountability of EIA process; public participation and proper post monitoring system. The problems identified in the assessment process are the lack of incorporating cumulative effects and sustainability concepts. To address these issues, legislature should be improved and they should focus on allocating proper weight to the EIA findings in the decision process. Analysing impacts should focus more on concepts of environmental resources and limitations rather than narrow impacts of the project. Further in impact assessment the product of magnitude of the impact and the duration of impact should be taken into account rather than just focusing on the magnitude. In addition to the project based EIA process, Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) can be practised to overcome the weaknesses of the reactive nature of EIA and to direct development in the right direction. Keywords: Environmental impact assessment, Effectiveness, Assessment methodology
斯里兰卡交通基础设施项目的环境影响评估:未来之路
环境影响评估是为了管理发展项目对环境造成的影响,并尽可能提高环境影响评估的质量。然而,最近几个项目的事件引发了一个问题:我们是否有效地利用了环评?因此,本研究旨在寻找提高环评质量和效果的可能方法。我们回顾了斯里兰卡和国际环境中有关环境影响评估过程的文献,以及与土木工程基础设施项目有关的几份过去的环境影响评估报告,以确定可能的改进。已确定的问题可分为两类;既定环评架构的问题、影响评估所采用的方法。该框架确定的主要问题是缺乏广泛的环境和社会保护框架;环评过程问责制;公众参与和适当的岗位监督制度。在评估过程中发现的问题是没有纳入累积效应和可持续性概念。为解决这些问题,应改善立法,并在决策过程中注重对环评结果给予适当的重视。分析影响应更多地关注环境资源和限制的概念,而不是项目的狭隘影响。此外,在进行影响评估时,应考虑影响程度与影响持续时间的乘积,而不应只关注影响程度。除了以项目为基础的环评程序外,策略性环境评估(SEA)亦可加以实施,以克服环评反应性的弱点,指引发展方向。关键词:环境影响评价;有效性;评价方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信