Formation of the "Self-Made-Man" Idea in the Worldview of the Renaissance and Reformation

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
O. M. Korkh, V. Antonova
{"title":"Formation of the \"Self-Made-Man\" Idea in the Worldview of the Renaissance and Reformation","authors":"O. M. Korkh, V. Antonova","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is the reflection on ways of philosophical legitimation for the \"Self-made-man\" idea in the worldview of the Renaissance and Reformation. Theoretical basis. Historical, comparative, and hermeneutic methods became the basis for this. The study is based on the works of Nicholas of Cusa, G. Pico della Mirandola, N. Machiavelli, M. Montaigne, E. Roterodamus, M. Luther, J. Calvin together with modern researchers of this period. Originality. The analysis allows us to come to the conclusion that casts doubt on the still widespread belief according to which the emergence of the \"Self-made-man\" idea is localized by the process of forming the American cultural code and the ideological heritage of Benjamin Franklin. It is highlighted that the formation of this idea is the result of a long process that originated in the ancient world and gains a special impetus in the Renaissance and Reformation. Precisely in the cultural context of the latter, the ancient intention to recognize the individual’s right to self-determination and self-government, which in the depths of Christian theology acquires only a potentially universal character, becomes not only acceptable but also, in the context of Protestantism worldview, the only admissible, in fact, individual’s obligatory life guidelines. Conclusions. Humanistic and reformation thoughts quite naturally led to further ideological legitimation of the person’s idea of who is creating oneself. This legitimation was during the complex interaction of numerous factors of culture in the Late Middle Ages, as well as ideas and intentions inherited from Antiquity. Key among them was the gradual formation of a new social order, in essence, indifferent to paternalistic rudiments, together with the ethics of Protestantism corresponding to it. The latter does not only legalize but, de facto, sacralizes the individual’s reorientation from hopes for the synergy of God’s grace and own free will in personal salvation, toward the self-reliance and personal efforts, awareness of personal responsibility for the own fate as key principles of the \"Self-made-man\" concept.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i21.260345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is the reflection on ways of philosophical legitimation for the "Self-made-man" idea in the worldview of the Renaissance and Reformation. Theoretical basis. Historical, comparative, and hermeneutic methods became the basis for this. The study is based on the works of Nicholas of Cusa, G. Pico della Mirandola, N. Machiavelli, M. Montaigne, E. Roterodamus, M. Luther, J. Calvin together with modern researchers of this period. Originality. The analysis allows us to come to the conclusion that casts doubt on the still widespread belief according to which the emergence of the "Self-made-man" idea is localized by the process of forming the American cultural code and the ideological heritage of Benjamin Franklin. It is highlighted that the formation of this idea is the result of a long process that originated in the ancient world and gains a special impetus in the Renaissance and Reformation. Precisely in the cultural context of the latter, the ancient intention to recognize the individual’s right to self-determination and self-government, which in the depths of Christian theology acquires only a potentially universal character, becomes not only acceptable but also, in the context of Protestantism worldview, the only admissible, in fact, individual’s obligatory life guidelines. Conclusions. Humanistic and reformation thoughts quite naturally led to further ideological legitimation of the person’s idea of who is creating oneself. This legitimation was during the complex interaction of numerous factors of culture in the Late Middle Ages, as well as ideas and intentions inherited from Antiquity. Key among them was the gradual formation of a new social order, in essence, indifferent to paternalistic rudiments, together with the ethics of Protestantism corresponding to it. The latter does not only legalize but, de facto, sacralizes the individual’s reorientation from hopes for the synergy of God’s grace and own free will in personal salvation, toward the self-reliance and personal efforts, awareness of personal responsibility for the own fate as key principles of the "Self-made-man" concept.
文艺复兴与宗教改革世界观中“自我创造的人”观念的形成
本研究的目的在于反思在文艺复兴和宗教改革的世界观中“自我创造的人”观念的哲学正当化途径。理论基础。历史的、比较的和解释学的方法成为这一理论的基础。这项研究是基于尼古拉斯的库萨,G.皮科德拉米兰多拉,N.马基雅维利,M.蒙田,E.罗特罗达莫斯,M.路德,J.加尔文以及这一时期的现代研究人员的作品。创意。这一分析使我们能够得出这样的结论:人们仍然普遍认为,“自力更生”观念的出现是由美国文化规范的形成过程和本杰明·富兰克林的思想遗产所局限的。强调这一思想的形成是一个长期过程的结果,它起源于古代世界,在文艺复兴和宗教改革中得到了特殊的推动。正是在后者的文化背景下,承认个人自决和自治权利的古老意图,在基督教神学的深处只获得了一种潜在的普遍特征,不仅成为可接受的,而且在新教世界观的背景下,成为唯一可接受的,实际上是个人强制性的生活准则。结论。人本主义和改革思想很自然地使人的“谁在创造自己”的观念在思想上进一步合法化。这种合法化是在中世纪晚期许多文化因素以及从古代继承的思想和意图的复杂相互作用中产生的。其中的关键是一种新的社会秩序的逐渐形成,本质上,对家长式的基本原理漠不关心,以及与之相适应的新教伦理。后者不仅使个人的重新定位合法化,而且事实上神圣化了个人的重新定位,从对上帝恩典和个人自由意志在个人救赎中的协同作用的希望,转向自力更生和个人努力,意识到个人对自己命运的责任,作为“自我创造的人”概念的关键原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信