Outcomes-based commissioning for social care in extra care housing: is there a future?

IF 0.6 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Randall Smith, R. Darton, A. Cameron, Eleanor K. Johnson, L. Lloyd, S. Evans, T. Atkinson, J. Porteus
{"title":"Outcomes-based commissioning for social care in extra care housing: is there a future?","authors":"Randall Smith, R. Darton, A. Cameron, Eleanor K. Johnson, L. Lloyd, S. Evans, T. Atkinson, J. Porteus","doi":"10.1108/HCS-03-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the process of commissioning adult social care services in England. It reflects the literature on commissioning at the strategic level followed by a section on operational or micro-commissioning. The rest of the paper focusses on the emergence of ideas about outcomes-based commissioning (OBC) in the field of adult social care and ends with critical consideration of the effectiveness of OBC in adult social care as applied to support and care provided in extra care housing. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe review of strategic and operational commissioning in adult social care in England (and Scotland in brief) is based on both policy documents and a review of the literature, as are the sources addressing OBC in adult social care particularly in extra care housing settings. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe core of this paper focusses on the challenges to the implementation of OBC in adult social care in the context of provision for residents in extra care housing. Of central importance are the impact of the squeeze on funding, increasing costs as a result of demographic change and the introduction of a national living wage plus the focus on the needs of service users through the idea of person-centred care and resistance to change on the part of adult social care staff and workers in other relevant settings. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nAddressing the implementation of OBC in adult social care in England in the context of extra care housing.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"59 1","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-03-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the process of commissioning adult social care services in England. It reflects the literature on commissioning at the strategic level followed by a section on operational or micro-commissioning. The rest of the paper focusses on the emergence of ideas about outcomes-based commissioning (OBC) in the field of adult social care and ends with critical consideration of the effectiveness of OBC in adult social care as applied to support and care provided in extra care housing. Design/methodology/approach The review of strategic and operational commissioning in adult social care in England (and Scotland in brief) is based on both policy documents and a review of the literature, as are the sources addressing OBC in adult social care particularly in extra care housing settings. Findings The core of this paper focusses on the challenges to the implementation of OBC in adult social care in the context of provision for residents in extra care housing. Of central importance are the impact of the squeeze on funding, increasing costs as a result of demographic change and the introduction of a national living wage plus the focus on the needs of service users through the idea of person-centred care and resistance to change on the part of adult social care staff and workers in other relevant settings. Originality/value Addressing the implementation of OBC in adult social care in England in the context of extra care housing.
基于结果的特护住房社会关怀委托:有未来吗?
目的本文的目的是提供一个概述的过程委托成人社会护理服务在英国。它反映了在战略层面上调试的文献,随后是关于操作或微调试的一节。本文的其余部分侧重于关于成人社会护理领域中基于结果的委托(OBC)的想法的出现,并以对OBC在成人社会护理中应用于额外护理住房中提供的支持和护理的有效性的批判性考虑结束。设计/方法/方法对英格兰(和苏格兰)成人社会护理的战略和业务委托的审查是基于政策文件和文献综述,以及解决成人社会护理中OBC的来源,特别是在额外护理住房环境中。本研究的核心是在提供额外照顾住房的背景下,在成人社会照顾中实施OBC所面临的挑战。最重要的是资金短缺的影响,人口变化造成的费用增加,实行国家生活工资,加上通过以人为中心的护理思想关注服务使用者的需要,以及成人社会护理工作人员和其他有关环境中的工作人员抵制变革。独创性/价值:在额外护理住房的背景下,解决英国成人社会护理中OBC的实施问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信