Identifying unique outcomes in relationships: potential application of narrative therapy for a serodiscordant gay couple

Q3 Social Sciences
Pei-Fen Chuang
{"title":"Identifying unique outcomes in relationships: potential application of narrative therapy for a serodiscordant gay couple","authors":"Pei-Fen Chuang","doi":"10.1080/17525098.2022.2126868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study was conducted upon the request of a serodiscordant couple to write an article to provide narrative materials for gender equality and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) destigmatisation. This study sought to enable serodiscordant couples to identify unique outcomes in their relationships, and attempted to understand the connection between gay men and the stigma of AIDS. The researcher employed narrative therapy conversation externalisation and relative-influence questions to identify unique outcomes for this couple, and gained three insights through the conversations. (1) An overemphasis on unique imagination may not lead to unique outcomes; (2) therapists should focus on the problems mainstream society imposes on nonmainstream narratives; and (3) narrative therapy emphasises context, which enabled the researcher to better understand herself. The results of this study indicate that serodiscordant couples should be regarded as a unit. With narrative therapy, the couple had the opportunity to develop a coconstructed alternative story.","PeriodicalId":38938,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Social Work","volume":"30 1","pages":"30 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2126868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study was conducted upon the request of a serodiscordant couple to write an article to provide narrative materials for gender equality and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) destigmatisation. This study sought to enable serodiscordant couples to identify unique outcomes in their relationships, and attempted to understand the connection between gay men and the stigma of AIDS. The researcher employed narrative therapy conversation externalisation and relative-influence questions to identify unique outcomes for this couple, and gained three insights through the conversations. (1) An overemphasis on unique imagination may not lead to unique outcomes; (2) therapists should focus on the problems mainstream society imposes on nonmainstream narratives; and (3) narrative therapy emphasises context, which enabled the researcher to better understand herself. The results of this study indicate that serodiscordant couples should be regarded as a unit. With narrative therapy, the couple had the opportunity to develop a coconstructed alternative story.
确定关系中的独特结果:叙事疗法对血清不和谐同性恋夫妇的潜在应用
本研究应一对血清不和谐夫妇的要求撰写一篇文章,为性别平等和艾滋病(AIDS)去污名化提供叙事材料。这项研究试图让血清不和谐的夫妇在他们的关系中识别出独特的结果,并试图理解男同性恋者与艾滋病的耻辱之间的联系。研究人员采用叙事疗法,对话外化和相对影响问题来确定这对夫妇的独特结果,并通过对话获得了三个见解。(1)过分强调独特的想象力可能不会带来独特的结果;(2)治疗师应关注主流社会对非主流叙事施加的问题;(3)叙事疗法强调语境,使研究者更好地了解自己。本研究结果表明,应将血清不一致的夫妇视为一个单位。通过叙事疗法,这对夫妇有机会发展一个共同构建的另类故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Journal of Social Work
China Journal of Social Work Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信