{"title":"„Der Mensch ist dazu gemacht, das Menschliche zu ergründen.“","authors":"Samuel Thoma","doi":"10.25162/MHJ-2019-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a contribution to the theoretical and philosophical foundations of the West German psychiatric reform. I argue that the phenomenological anthropological approach played a crucial role for changes in psychiatry during the late 1950s and early 1960s (the so-called “reform before the reform”, cf. Kersting) and that this approach gave rise to the specific anthropological attitude of German social psychiatry towards mental illness. To show this in detail, I will focus on four key figures of the aforementioned reform: Walter von Baeyer, Heinz Hafner, Caspar Kulenkampff and Karl Peter Kisker. I will first give a short summary of their phenomenological anthropological concepts and then reflect upon the relevance of these concepts for the reform. In the following, I will highlight the critiques made by Erich Wulff, Klaus Dorner and Karl Peter Kisker to further indicate the problematic relation between social psychiatry and anthropological psychiatry. Finally, I will discuss the impact of what I call the anthropological social-psychiatric attitude on the reform of West German psychiatry.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"s1-16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/MHJ-2019-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article is a contribution to the theoretical and philosophical foundations of the West German psychiatric reform. I argue that the phenomenological anthropological approach played a crucial role for changes in psychiatry during the late 1950s and early 1960s (the so-called “reform before the reform”, cf. Kersting) and that this approach gave rise to the specific anthropological attitude of German social psychiatry towards mental illness. To show this in detail, I will focus on four key figures of the aforementioned reform: Walter von Baeyer, Heinz Hafner, Caspar Kulenkampff and Karl Peter Kisker. I will first give a short summary of their phenomenological anthropological concepts and then reflect upon the relevance of these concepts for the reform. In the following, I will highlight the critiques made by Erich Wulff, Klaus Dorner and Karl Peter Kisker to further indicate the problematic relation between social psychiatry and anthropological psychiatry. Finally, I will discuss the impact of what I call the anthropological social-psychiatric attitude on the reform of West German psychiatry.
本文是对西德精神病学改革的理论和哲学基础的贡献。我认为,现象学人类学方法在20世纪50年代末和60年代初的精神病学变革中发挥了至关重要的作用(所谓的“改革前的改革”,参见Kersting),这种方法导致了德国社会精神病学对精神疾病的特定人类学态度。为了详细说明这一点,我将重点介绍上述改革的四位关键人物:瓦尔特·冯·拜尔、海因茨·哈夫纳、卡斯帕·库伦坎普夫和卡尔·彼得·基斯克。我将首先简要概述他们的现象学人类学概念,然后反思这些概念与改革的相关性。在下文中,我将重点介绍Erich Wulff、Klaus Dorner和Karl Peter Kisker的批评,以进一步指出社会精神病学和人类学精神病学之间存在问题的关系。最后,我将讨论我所谓的人类学社会精神病学态度对西德精神病学改革的影响。