Validation of the Risk Prediction Tool for Wound Infection in Abdominal Surgery Patients

Hyun Kyoung Jung, Eun Nam Lee
{"title":"Validation of the Risk Prediction Tool for Wound Infection in Abdominal Surgery Patients","authors":"Hyun Kyoung Jung, Eun Nam Lee","doi":"10.34250/jkccn.2022.15.3.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This retrospective investigation study aimed to determine the predictive validity of superficial surgical site infection assessment tools by measuring the risk score at the surgical site.Methods : This study included patients hospitalized to the general surgery department of a Hospital from January 2021 to December 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were age ≥19 years, general abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, and hospital stay longer than 2 days. Patients who had undergone transplantation were excluded.Results : Tool validity results showed that tools including surgical time and operative procedure were more accurate than previously developed tools, with a sensitivity of 71.1%, specificity of 71.4%, positive prediction of 12.3%, negative prediction of 97.8%, and area under the curve of 0.743 (95% confidence interval, 0.678~0.745). The tool's cut-off score was 15, and the risks of infection was increased by 6.14 times at or above this cut-off point. Preoperative hair removal period, surgical wound classification, surgery time, body temperature on the second day after surgery, drainage tube type, and suture type affected the risk of infection at the surgical site.Conclusion : The incidence of healthcare-associated infections has been declining in the past decade; however, surgical site infections still account for a considerable proportion. Therefore, early identification of high-risk groups for surgical site infection is crucial for reducing the incidence of surgical site infection using appropriate management.","PeriodicalId":16247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2022.15.3.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose : This retrospective investigation study aimed to determine the predictive validity of superficial surgical site infection assessment tools by measuring the risk score at the surgical site.Methods : This study included patients hospitalized to the general surgery department of a Hospital from January 2021 to December 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were age ≥19 years, general abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, and hospital stay longer than 2 days. Patients who had undergone transplantation were excluded.Results : Tool validity results showed that tools including surgical time and operative procedure were more accurate than previously developed tools, with a sensitivity of 71.1%, specificity of 71.4%, positive prediction of 12.3%, negative prediction of 97.8%, and area under the curve of 0.743 (95% confidence interval, 0.678~0.745). The tool's cut-off score was 15, and the risks of infection was increased by 6.14 times at or above this cut-off point. Preoperative hair removal period, surgical wound classification, surgery time, body temperature on the second day after surgery, drainage tube type, and suture type affected the risk of infection at the surgical site.Conclusion : The incidence of healthcare-associated infections has been declining in the past decade; however, surgical site infections still account for a considerable proportion. Therefore, early identification of high-risk groups for surgical site infection is crucial for reducing the incidence of surgical site infection using appropriate management.
腹部手术患者伤口感染风险预测工具的验证
目的:本回顾性调查研究旨在通过测量手术部位的风险评分来确定浅表手术部位感染评估工具的预测有效性。方法:本研究纳入某医院2021年1月至2021年12月31日在普通外科住院的患者。纳入标准为年龄≥19岁、全麻下腹部手术、住院时间大于2天。已接受移植的患者排除在外。结果:工具效度结果显示,包括手术时间和手术方式在内的工具比以往开发的工具更准确,敏感性为71.1%,特异性为71.4%,阳性预测为12.3%,阴性预测为97.8%,曲线下面积为0.743(95%可信区间为0.678~0.745)。该工具的临界值为15分,在此临界值或以上,感染风险增加了6.14倍。术前脱毛时间、手术伤口分类、手术时间、术后第二天体温、引流管类型、缝合方式影响手术部位感染风险。结论:近十年来,卫生保健相关感染的发生率呈下降趋势;然而,手术部位感染仍占相当大的比例。因此,早期识别手术部位感染的高危人群对于通过适当的处理降低手术部位感染的发生率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信