Simple Patent Protection: A Case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and The Comparison to Malaysia Utility Innovation Protection

Q3 Social Sciences
Rohmat Rohmat, Waspiah Waspiah, David Chuah Cee Wei
{"title":"Simple Patent Protection: A Case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and The Comparison to Malaysia Utility Innovation Protection","authors":"Rohmat Rohmat, Waspiah Waspiah, David Chuah Cee Wei","doi":"10.15294/jils.v7i1.55439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work or products of SMEs are important for the protection of intellectual property rights. The Sarung Tenun Goyor in its production process has gone through long ideas and experiments to produce a distinctive motif and shape, but it becomes a problem whether a traditional work can be subjected to simple patent protection and instead ignores social values ​​and the value of community justice. In addition, Malaysia also has certain protection for utility innovalition that close to simple patent protection in Indonesia. This study is intended to analyze the simple patent protection in the case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and Malaysia Utility Innovation Protectopn. This study showed that to fulfill the novelty element, development of the existing production process could be carried out while still paying attention to the values ​​of justice, social, and propriety. The fulfillment of Access Benefit Sharing stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents provides legal certainty of simple patent protection derived from traditional knowledge. Whereas the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor can be said to be a form of intellectual property and fulfills the elements as a simple patent object. The conclusion of this research is that the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor has not received legal protection. The Patent Law provides legal certainty for the development of the sarung tenun goyor production process by fulfilling Access Benefit Sharing (ABS).","PeriodicalId":32877,"journal":{"name":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.55439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The work or products of SMEs are important for the protection of intellectual property rights. The Sarung Tenun Goyor in its production process has gone through long ideas and experiments to produce a distinctive motif and shape, but it becomes a problem whether a traditional work can be subjected to simple patent protection and instead ignores social values ​​and the value of community justice. In addition, Malaysia also has certain protection for utility innovalition that close to simple patent protection in Indonesia. This study is intended to analyze the simple patent protection in the case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and Malaysia Utility Innovation Protectopn. This study showed that to fulfill the novelty element, development of the existing production process could be carried out while still paying attention to the values ​​of justice, social, and propriety. The fulfillment of Access Benefit Sharing stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents provides legal certainty of simple patent protection derived from traditional knowledge. Whereas the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor can be said to be a form of intellectual property and fulfills the elements as a simple patent object. The conclusion of this research is that the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor has not received legal protection. The Patent Law provides legal certainty for the development of the sarung tenun goyor production process by fulfilling Access Benefit Sharing (ABS).
简单专利保护:以印尼萨隆特农省为例及与马来西亚实用创新保护的比较
中小企业的工作或产品对保护知识产权具有重要意义。《萨隆天农歌约尔》在制作过程中经历了漫长的构思和实验,产生了独特的母题和造型,但传统作品能否得到简单的专利保护,而忽视了社会价值和社区正义的价值,成为一个问题。此外,马来西亚对实用新型创新也有一定的保护,接近于印度尼西亚的简单专利保护。本研究旨在分析印尼沙隆特农省与马来西亚实用创新保护案例中的简单专利保护。本研究表明,为了满足新颖性元素,可以在发展现有生产过程的同时,仍然关注正义、社会和礼仪的价值观。2016年第13号专利法中关于获取利益分享的规定的实现,为源自传统知识的简单专利保护提供了法律确定性。而Sarung Tenun Goyor的生产过程可以说是知识产权的一种形式,作为一个简单的专利对象实现了要素。本研究的结论是,萨隆特农果脯的制作过程并没有得到法律的保护。《专利法》通过实现获取利益分享(ABS)的原则,为发展沙龙丸生产工艺提供了法律上的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信