Statistical Analysis of Students’ Behavioral and Attendance Habits in Engineering Education

Q2 Social Sciences
Vanessa Ibáñez, Sergio Pérez, Josep Silva, Salvador Tamarit
{"title":"Statistical Analysis of Students’ Behavioral and Attendance Habits in Engineering Education","authors":"Vanessa Ibáñez, Sergio Pérez, Josep Silva, Salvador Tamarit","doi":"10.12738/estp.2019.4.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at quantifying the relationship between the marks of students and their seating position in the classroom. The study is cross-sectional, quantitative, observational, and correlational. It analyzed data collected throughout two academic years about the students’ marks (in different terms, courses, and degrees) and about their daily seating position (so, every change was recorded) for both theory and practice lessons. The quantitative data collected in the study was statistically analyzed. The main result is that the seating position is significantly correlated with the marks in the studied context (engineering schools with classrooms with 5-66 students). Other side results show a positive influence on marks of working alone with respect to sharing the computer with a classmate; indicate where do students who give up the course usually sit, and when in the academic term do, they give up. This article provides empirical data with regards to the relation between classroom seating and academic performance in engineering schools. The results obtained quantify this relation, but they cannot determine whether it is causal, consequential, or both. This study complements other studies that correlated motivation with seating preferences.","PeriodicalId":53643,"journal":{"name":"Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.4.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims at quantifying the relationship between the marks of students and their seating position in the classroom. The study is cross-sectional, quantitative, observational, and correlational. It analyzed data collected throughout two academic years about the students’ marks (in different terms, courses, and degrees) and about their daily seating position (so, every change was recorded) for both theory and practice lessons. The quantitative data collected in the study was statistically analyzed. The main result is that the seating position is significantly correlated with the marks in the studied context (engineering schools with classrooms with 5-66 students). Other side results show a positive influence on marks of working alone with respect to sharing the computer with a classmate; indicate where do students who give up the course usually sit, and when in the academic term do, they give up. This article provides empirical data with regards to the relation between classroom seating and academic performance in engineering schools. The results obtained quantify this relation, but they cannot determine whether it is causal, consequential, or both. This study complements other studies that correlated motivation with seating preferences.
工科教育学生行为与出勤习惯的统计分析
本研究旨在量化学生的分数与他们在课堂上的座位位置之间的关系。该研究是横断面的、定量的、观察性的和相关性的。它分析了两个学年收集的数据,包括学生在理论和实践课上的分数(不同的术语、课程和学位)和他们每天的座位位置(因此,每次变化都被记录下来)。对研究中收集到的定量数据进行统计分析。研究的主要结果是,在研究的背景下(工程学校的教室有5-66名学生),座位位置与分数显著相关。另一方面的结果显示,与同学共用电脑对单独学习的分数有积极影响;说明放弃这门课程的学生通常坐在哪里,以及在学期中他们放弃了什么。本文提供了工科学校课堂座位与学习成绩之间关系的实证数据。获得的结果量化了这种关系,但它们不能确定它是因果关系,结果关系,还是两者兼而有之。这项研究补充了其他将动机与座位偏好联系起来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice
Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信