{"title":"With reasons of the heart before God. On religious experience from an evolutionary-theological perspective","authors":"D. Veldsman","doi":"10.5952/55-1-2-534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What does the affective-cognitive dimension of being human\n entails? Many contemporary scholars from theological (especially religious\n experience) perspectives as well as from evolutionary biological (especially\n neuroscientific) perspectives have made exciting inroads in the on-going\n anthropological discourses on this very dimension of being human. My article\n partially makes work of their respective contributions. For the former theological\n perspective I will utilize Pascal and Stoker. For the latter neuroscientific\n perspective I will concentrate on LeDoux and Damasio. I call my contribution an\n evolutionary-theological re-conceptualisation of religious experience for which I\n make use of Pascal’s famous words from his Pensees (1670) “The\n heart has its reasons which reason does not know” and “(i)t is the heart which\n experiences God and not the reason”. Therefore the title: With reasons of the heart\n before God. Such a formulation however immediately raises the question: Does such an\n emphasis on the “heart” re-introduce irrationality into the scientific scholarly\n dialogue? The answer is clear: Yes, it does. It is argued that it should be\n re-introduced constructively into contemporary science-theology discourses in order\n – on the one hand – to critically address the very accusation, and – on the other\n hand – to present us with a far richer, deeper understanding of personhood. From the\n constructive integration of the two perspectives, namely the theological and\n neuroscientific the words of Pascal is finally re-formulated from an\n evolutionary-theological perspective and qualified in which emotion is presented as\n the embodiment of the logic of survival.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
What does the affective-cognitive dimension of being human
entails? Many contemporary scholars from theological (especially religious
experience) perspectives as well as from evolutionary biological (especially
neuroscientific) perspectives have made exciting inroads in the on-going
anthropological discourses on this very dimension of being human. My article
partially makes work of their respective contributions. For the former theological
perspective I will utilize Pascal and Stoker. For the latter neuroscientific
perspective I will concentrate on LeDoux and Damasio. I call my contribution an
evolutionary-theological re-conceptualisation of religious experience for which I
make use of Pascal’s famous words from his Pensees (1670) “The
heart has its reasons which reason does not know” and “(i)t is the heart which
experiences God and not the reason”. Therefore the title: With reasons of the heart
before God. Such a formulation however immediately raises the question: Does such an
emphasis on the “heart” re-introduce irrationality into the scientific scholarly
dialogue? The answer is clear: Yes, it does. It is argued that it should be
re-introduced constructively into contemporary science-theology discourses in order
– on the one hand – to critically address the very accusation, and – on the other
hand – to present us with a far richer, deeper understanding of personhood. From the
constructive integration of the two perspectives, namely the theological and
neuroscientific the words of Pascal is finally re-formulated from an
evolutionary-theological perspective and qualified in which emotion is presented as
the embodiment of the logic of survival.