Exploring the motivations, satisfactions, and well-being of agricultural intentional community residents

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Jess Lasoff-Santos, Raymond De Young
{"title":"Exploring the motivations, satisfactions, and well-being of agricultural intentional community residents","authors":"Jess Lasoff-Santos, Raymond De Young","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intentional communities have long provided an alternative living solution for those wanting to live with a group of others who share their values. Intentional community residents throughout the U.S. were surveyed to discover their intrinsic satis­factions and motivations, and community features they envision in their futures, as well as to investi­gate their psychological well-being and if they experience or search for personal meaning. Of the 204 U.S. communities identified with a gardening or agricultural focus, 83 agreed to be surveyed, gar­nering 259 responses. It was found that engage­ment in local food systems elicits intrinsic satisfac­tion in the areas of community food (such as growing and sharing food with neighbors) and participation (such as contributing to a larger goal or purpose). However, local food system engagement does not strongly increase psychological well-being, suggest­ing that those living in agricultural communities may have their well-being supported in other life­style areas. Recommendations for communication and recruitment are then addressed: it is important to emphasize communitarian and social values when advertising intentional communities to inter­ested parties. Secondary values, such as environ­mentalism, and the intrinsic satisfaction associated with participation can also be successfully used in communication, especially when paired with future-oriented envisioning of their communities.","PeriodicalId":51829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.122.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intentional communities have long provided an alternative living solution for those wanting to live with a group of others who share their values. Intentional community residents throughout the U.S. were surveyed to discover their intrinsic satis­factions and motivations, and community features they envision in their futures, as well as to investi­gate their psychological well-being and if they experience or search for personal meaning. Of the 204 U.S. communities identified with a gardening or agricultural focus, 83 agreed to be surveyed, gar­nering 259 responses. It was found that engage­ment in local food systems elicits intrinsic satisfac­tion in the areas of community food (such as growing and sharing food with neighbors) and participation (such as contributing to a larger goal or purpose). However, local food system engagement does not strongly increase psychological well-being, suggest­ing that those living in agricultural communities may have their well-being supported in other life­style areas. Recommendations for communication and recruitment are then addressed: it is important to emphasize communitarian and social values when advertising intentional communities to inter­ested parties. Secondary values, such as environ­mentalism, and the intrinsic satisfaction associated with participation can also be successfully used in communication, especially when paired with future-oriented envisioning of their communities.
探讨农业意向性社区居民的动机、满意度与幸福感
长期以来,意向社区为那些希望与一群价值观相同的人生活在一起的人提供了另一种生活解决方案。美国各地的意向社区居民接受了调查,以发现他们的内在满足感和动机,以及他们在未来设想的社区特征,以及调查他们的心理健康状况,以及他们是否体验或寻找个人意义。在204个以园艺或农业为重点的美国社区中,有83个同意接受调查,共收到259份回复。研究发现,参与当地食品系统可以在社区食品(如种植和与邻居分享食物)和参与(如为更大的目标或目的做出贡献)方面获得内在的满足感。然而,参与当地粮食系统并不能显著提高心理幸福感,这表明生活在农业社区的人可能会在其他生活方式领域得到幸福感的支持。然后讨论了关于沟通和招聘的建议:在向有关各方宣传有意社区时,强调社区和社会价值是很重要的。次要的价值观,如环境保护主义,以及与参与相关的内在满足感,也可以成功地应用于交流中,特别是当与面向未来的社区设想相结合时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信