Standard technique versus rotational technique of insertion of Baska mask®

Sheetal, Seema Jindal, G. Sidhu, S. Jindal, Sandeep Kaur
{"title":"Standard technique versus rotational technique of insertion of Baska mask®","authors":"Sheetal, Seema Jindal, G. Sidhu, S. Jindal, Sandeep Kaur","doi":"10.4103/arwy.arwy_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Baska Mask® is a new third-generation supraglottic airway device (SGAD). The placement of Baska Mask® using the standard technique causes posterior displacement of the tongue, leading to incorrect positioning and insertion failure. The rotation technique may alleviate this obstacle during insertion by decreasing resistance between the airway and tongue. The primary objective of this study was to compare the insertion time between the standard versus rotational technique of Baska Mask®, and the secondary outcome measures were ease of insertion, number of attempts and postoperative airway morbidity with both techniques. Methods: One hundred consenting adults of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 20–65 years of either gender scheduled for a variety of surgical procedures under general anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital (May 2019 to November 2020), were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to Group S and Group R using the standard and rotation techniques, respectively. All statistical analyses were done using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. The comparison of quantitative variables between the study groups was done using the Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test. For comparing categorical data, the Chi-square χ2 test was performed. Results: The mean insertion time was significantly higher with the standard compared to the rotation technique of Baska Mask (20.90 ± 3.13 vs. 14.84 ± 1.11 s, P = 0.000). Device insertion was easy in rotation compared to the standard technique (P = 0.031). The number of attempts required for insertion was more with the standard technique than with the rotation technique (P = 0.011). Conclusion: Although the standard technique of Baska Mask® remains the first choice, the rotational technique of Baska Mask® has a higher success of insertion with fewer complications than the standard technique; hence, it can be accepted as an alternative.","PeriodicalId":7848,"journal":{"name":"Airway Pharmacology and Treatment","volume":"57 1","pages":"17 - 22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Airway Pharmacology and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/arwy.arwy_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Baska Mask® is a new third-generation supraglottic airway device (SGAD). The placement of Baska Mask® using the standard technique causes posterior displacement of the tongue, leading to incorrect positioning and insertion failure. The rotation technique may alleviate this obstacle during insertion by decreasing resistance between the airway and tongue. The primary objective of this study was to compare the insertion time between the standard versus rotational technique of Baska Mask®, and the secondary outcome measures were ease of insertion, number of attempts and postoperative airway morbidity with both techniques. Methods: One hundred consenting adults of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 20–65 years of either gender scheduled for a variety of surgical procedures under general anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital (May 2019 to November 2020), were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to Group S and Group R using the standard and rotation techniques, respectively. All statistical analyses were done using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. The comparison of quantitative variables between the study groups was done using the Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney test. For comparing categorical data, the Chi-square χ2 test was performed. Results: The mean insertion time was significantly higher with the standard compared to the rotation technique of Baska Mask (20.90 ± 3.13 vs. 14.84 ± 1.11 s, P = 0.000). Device insertion was easy in rotation compared to the standard technique (P = 0.031). The number of attempts required for insertion was more with the standard technique than with the rotation technique (P = 0.011). Conclusion: Although the standard technique of Baska Mask® remains the first choice, the rotational technique of Baska Mask® has a higher success of insertion with fewer complications than the standard technique; hence, it can be accepted as an alternative.
Baska口罩®的标准插入技术与旋转插入技术
背景与目的:Baska Mask®是一种新型第三代声门上气道设备(SGAD)。使用标准技术放置Baska Mask®会导致舌头后侧移位,导致定位错误和插入失败。旋转技术可以通过减少气道和舌间的阻力来减轻插入时的障碍。本研究的主要目的是比较Baska Mask®标准技术与旋转技术的插入时间,次要结局指标是两种技术的插入难易程度、尝试次数和术后气道发病率。方法:研究纳入了100名来自美国麻醉师协会I-II的成年人,年龄在20-65岁,男女皆可,计划在三级医院(2019年5月至2020年11月)进行全身麻醉下的各种外科手术。采用标准技术和旋转技术将患者随机分为S组和R组。所有统计分析均使用SPSS (statistical Package for the Social Sciences)软件进行。各研究组间定量变量的比较采用学生t检验和Mann-Whitney检验。分类资料比较采用χ2检验。结果:与Baska Mask旋转技术相比,采用标准技术的平均插入时间显著增加(20.90±3.13 s vs. 14.84±1.11 s, P = 0.000)。与标准技术相比,旋转装置插入容易(P = 0.031)。标准技术插入所需的尝试次数多于旋转技术(P = 0.011)。结论:虽然Baska Mask®标准技术仍然是首选,但Baska Mask®旋转技术比标准技术置入成功率高,并发症少;因此,它可以被接受为一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信