Proximal humerus fractures and shoulder dislocations: Prevalence of concomitant rotator cuff tear

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
M. Green, Ross Whetter, O. Al-Dadah
{"title":"Proximal humerus fractures and shoulder dislocations: Prevalence of concomitant rotator cuff tear","authors":"M. Green, Ross Whetter, O. Al-Dadah","doi":"10.1177/22104917221101409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Proximal humerus fractures and shoulder dislocations are relatively common. However, an associated rotator cuff tear is often missed with these injuries. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of a concomitant rotator cuff tear associated with common shoulder injuries. Methods: A cross-sectional epidemiological study of three patient populations: Group 1. Proximal Humerus Fractures; Group 2. Shoulder Dislocations; Group 3. Proximal Humerus Fracture-Dislocations. All patients within these three groups presented to and underwent subsequent management of their shoulder injury at a trauma unit. Management included both non-operative and operative intervention. Patients were evaluated for associated rotator cuff tears. Results: This study included a total of 196 patients: Group 1 = 146 Proximal Humerus Fractures; Group 2 = 37 Shoulder Dislocations; Group 3 = 13 Proximal Humerus Fracture-Dislocations. Of the 196 patients in total, 23 (11.7%) sustained a concomitant rotator cuff tear. The highest number of tears was found in Group 1 (n = 14). However, the highest percentage prevalence of tears was in Group 2 (18.9%). There was noted to be a higher prevalence of rotator cuff tears with increasing age. Twenty-two (95.7%) rotator cuff tears were detected in patients over 50 years of age. The vast majority of rotator cuff tears were detected by ultrasound (78.3%) as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging (21.7%). The majority of tears were full-thickness (60.9%). Of the 23 patients with a concomitant rotator cuff tear, 17 involved a single tendon (73.9%) and supraspinatus was most common (69.6%). Conclusions: A concomitant rotator cuff tear in association with a proximal humerus fracture, shoulder dislocation or proximal humerus fracture-dislocation is relatively common. The overall rotator cuff tear prevalence in this study was 11.9%. Rotator cuff tears are more likely to occur in patients over 50 years old and those sustaining a shoulder dislocation.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221101409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal humerus fractures and shoulder dislocations are relatively common. However, an associated rotator cuff tear is often missed with these injuries. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of a concomitant rotator cuff tear associated with common shoulder injuries. Methods: A cross-sectional epidemiological study of three patient populations: Group 1. Proximal Humerus Fractures; Group 2. Shoulder Dislocations; Group 3. Proximal Humerus Fracture-Dislocations. All patients within these three groups presented to and underwent subsequent management of their shoulder injury at a trauma unit. Management included both non-operative and operative intervention. Patients were evaluated for associated rotator cuff tears. Results: This study included a total of 196 patients: Group 1 = 146 Proximal Humerus Fractures; Group 2 = 37 Shoulder Dislocations; Group 3 = 13 Proximal Humerus Fracture-Dislocations. Of the 196 patients in total, 23 (11.7%) sustained a concomitant rotator cuff tear. The highest number of tears was found in Group 1 (n = 14). However, the highest percentage prevalence of tears was in Group 2 (18.9%). There was noted to be a higher prevalence of rotator cuff tears with increasing age. Twenty-two (95.7%) rotator cuff tears were detected in patients over 50 years of age. The vast majority of rotator cuff tears were detected by ultrasound (78.3%) as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging (21.7%). The majority of tears were full-thickness (60.9%). Of the 23 patients with a concomitant rotator cuff tear, 17 involved a single tendon (73.9%) and supraspinatus was most common (69.6%). Conclusions: A concomitant rotator cuff tear in association with a proximal humerus fracture, shoulder dislocation or proximal humerus fracture-dislocation is relatively common. The overall rotator cuff tear prevalence in this study was 11.9%. Rotator cuff tears are more likely to occur in patients over 50 years old and those sustaining a shoulder dislocation.
肱骨近端骨折和肩部脱位:并发肩袖撕裂的发生率
背景:肱骨近端骨折和肩部脱位是相对常见的。然而,这些损伤通常会遗漏相关的肩袖撕裂。本研究的目的是评估伴随肩袖撕裂与常见肩部损伤的发生率。方法:对3组患者进行横断面流行病学研究:第一组。肱骨近端骨折;组2。肩膀脱臼;组3。肱骨近端骨折脱位。这三组中的所有患者都在创伤病房接受了肩部损伤的后续治疗。治疗包括非手术和手术干预。评估患者是否伴有肩袖撕裂。结果:本研究共纳入196例患者:第一组= 146例肱骨近端骨折;第二组= 37例肩关节脱位;3组= 13例肱骨近端骨折脱位。在196例患者中,23例(11.7%)伴有肩袖撕裂。第1组泪液数量最多(n = 14)。然而,泪液患病率最高的是第2组(18.9%)。值得注意的是,随着年龄的增长,肩袖撕裂的发生率更高。在50岁以上的患者中发现22例(95.7%)肩袖撕裂。绝大多数肩袖撕裂是通过超声(78.3%)检测到的,而不是磁共振成像(21.7%)。大部分泪液为全层泪液(60.9%)。在23例伴发肩袖撕裂的患者中,17例累及单肌腱(73.9%),冈上肌最常见(69.6%)。结论:肩袖撕裂合并肱骨近端骨折、肩关节脱位或肱骨近端骨折脱位是比较常见的。本研究中肩袖撕裂的总体发生率为11.9%。肩袖撕裂更可能发生在50岁以上的患者和那些持续肩膀脱位的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信