Model Theory in a Paraconsistent Environment

B. C. Coscarelli
{"title":"Model Theory in a Paraconsistent Environment","authors":"B. C. Coscarelli","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to develop a paraconsistent Model Theory. The basis for such a theory was launched by Walter Carnielli, Marcelo Esteban Coniglio, Rodrigo Podiack, and Tarcísio Rodrigues in the article ‘On the Way to a Wider Model Theory: Completeness Theorems for First-Order Logics of Formal Inconsistency’ [The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7 (2014)]. Naturally, a complete theory cannot be fully developed in a single work. Indeed, the goal of this work is to show that a paraconsistent Model Theory is a sound and worthy possibility. The pursuit of this goal is divided in three tasks: The first one is to give the theory a philosophical meaning. The second one is to transpose as many results from the classical theory to the new one as possible. The third one is to show an application of the theory to practical science. The response to the first task is a Paraconsistent Reasoning System. The start point is that paraconsistency is an epistemological concept. The pursuit of a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of paraconsistency from this point of view leads to a reasoning system based on the Logics of Formal Inconsistency. Models are regarded as states of knowledge and the concept of isomorphism is reformulated so as to give raise to a new concept that preserves a portion of the whole knowledge of each state. Based on this, a notion of refinement is created which may occur from inside or from outside the state. In order to respond to the second task, two important classical results, namely the Omitting Types Theorem and Craig’s Interpolation Theorem are shown to hold in the new system and it is also shown that, if classical results in general are to hold in a paraconsistent system, then such a system should be in essence how it was developed here. Finally, the response to the third task is a proposal of what a Paraconsistent Logic Programming may be. For that, the basis for a paraconsistent PROLOG is settled in the light of the ideas developed so far. Abstract prepared by Bruno Costa Coscarelli. E-mail: brunocostacoscarelli@gmail.com URL: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/331697","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":"22 1","pages":"216 - 216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to develop a paraconsistent Model Theory. The basis for such a theory was launched by Walter Carnielli, Marcelo Esteban Coniglio, Rodrigo Podiack, and Tarcísio Rodrigues in the article ‘On the Way to a Wider Model Theory: Completeness Theorems for First-Order Logics of Formal Inconsistency’ [The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7 (2014)]. Naturally, a complete theory cannot be fully developed in a single work. Indeed, the goal of this work is to show that a paraconsistent Model Theory is a sound and worthy possibility. The pursuit of this goal is divided in three tasks: The first one is to give the theory a philosophical meaning. The second one is to transpose as many results from the classical theory to the new one as possible. The third one is to show an application of the theory to practical science. The response to the first task is a Paraconsistent Reasoning System. The start point is that paraconsistency is an epistemological concept. The pursuit of a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of paraconsistency from this point of view leads to a reasoning system based on the Logics of Formal Inconsistency. Models are regarded as states of knowledge and the concept of isomorphism is reformulated so as to give raise to a new concept that preserves a portion of the whole knowledge of each state. Based on this, a notion of refinement is created which may occur from inside or from outside the state. In order to respond to the second task, two important classical results, namely the Omitting Types Theorem and Craig’s Interpolation Theorem are shown to hold in the new system and it is also shown that, if classical results in general are to hold in a paraconsistent system, then such a system should be in essence how it was developed here. Finally, the response to the third task is a proposal of what a Paraconsistent Logic Programming may be. For that, the basis for a paraconsistent PROLOG is settled in the light of the ideas developed so far. Abstract prepared by Bruno Costa Coscarelli. E-mail: brunocostacoscarelli@gmail.com URL: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/331697
准一致环境下的模型理论
摘要本文的目的是建立一个副协调模型理论。这种理论的基础是由Walter Carnielli, Marcelo Esteban Coniglio, Rodrigo Podiack和Tarcísio Rodrigues在文章“通往更广泛的模型理论的道路:形式不一致的一阶逻辑的完备性定理”中提出的[符号逻辑评论,vol. 7(2014)]。当然,一个完整的理论不可能在一部著作中得到充分的发展。事实上,这项工作的目标是表明一个副一致模型理论是一个健全的和有价值的可能性。对这一目标的追求分为三个任务:第一个任务是赋予理论哲学意义。第二种方法是将尽可能多的经典理论的结果转置到新的理论中。第三是展示理论在实际科学中的应用。对第一个任务的反应是一个副一致推理系统。首先,超一致性是一个认识论概念。从这个角度追求对副一致性现象的更深层次的理解,导致了一个基于形式不一致逻辑的推理系统。模型被视为知识的状态,同构的概念被重新表述,从而提出了一个新概念,即保留每个状态的全部知识的一部分。在此基础上,创建了一个细化的概念,它可能来自状态内部或外部。为了回应第二个任务,两个重要的经典结果,即省略类型定理和克雷格插值定理在新系统中被证明是成立的,并且还表明,如果经典结果一般是在一个副一致系统中成立,那么这个系统本质上应该是它在这里发展的样子。最后,对第三个任务的回应是关于什么是副一致逻辑编程的建议。为此,根据迄今为止发展的思想,确定了副一致性PROLOG的基础。摘要由Bruno Costa Coscarelli准备。电子邮件:brunocostacoscarelli@gmail.com URL: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/331697
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信