Authority and Litugical Formation: About a Reformational Dream, a Complex Set of Relationships, and a Play Worth Playing

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Alexander Deeg
{"title":"Authority and Litugical Formation: About a Reformational Dream, a Complex Set of Relationships, and a Play Worth Playing","authors":"Alexander Deeg","doi":"10.1177/00393207160461-209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of authority interrupts self-evident relationships of liturgical praxis and liturgical formation. It makes visible what otherwise would usually remain hidden. Both implicit actors and hidden power structures become identifiable. The Reformation was, among other things, a movement that became powerful by questioning previously dominant power structures. Liturgically it meant a normative centering of liturgical worship on just two active subjects: God and the community. In any case that is how we can describe the liturgical dream of the reformers to which Luther gave special expression in his 1544 Torgau church-dedication sermon. To be sure, this dream was never a reality at any time. For it was above all the pastor who gained control of the worship service; and from the outset, Evangelical worship was threatened by a horizontalizing of liturgical communication that tented to push, along with the community, even ‘God’ into becoming secondary subjects of the liturgy. Hence it is necessary to paint a more realistic picture of those who play a part in the liturgy. This results in a liturgical pyramid at the horizontal base of which we find pastors, the community, and the ‘Agende’ (ritual/tradition/Church), and whose verticals are constituted by the God-relation. Liturgical praxis takes place in the interplay of these poles, whereby in Evangelical Christianity it is usually the pastor who turns out to be the strong liturgical subject (even today in the context of the “Evangelisches Gottesdienstbuch”, 1999). Hence the question: How can we bring about a strengthening of the authority of the community in the God-community word-exchange of the liturgy? This requires liturgical instruction on at least three levels:","PeriodicalId":39597,"journal":{"name":"Studia Liturgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Liturgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207160461-209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The question of authority interrupts self-evident relationships of liturgical praxis and liturgical formation. It makes visible what otherwise would usually remain hidden. Both implicit actors and hidden power structures become identifiable. The Reformation was, among other things, a movement that became powerful by questioning previously dominant power structures. Liturgically it meant a normative centering of liturgical worship on just two active subjects: God and the community. In any case that is how we can describe the liturgical dream of the reformers to which Luther gave special expression in his 1544 Torgau church-dedication sermon. To be sure, this dream was never a reality at any time. For it was above all the pastor who gained control of the worship service; and from the outset, Evangelical worship was threatened by a horizontalizing of liturgical communication that tented to push, along with the community, even ‘God’ into becoming secondary subjects of the liturgy. Hence it is necessary to paint a more realistic picture of those who play a part in the liturgy. This results in a liturgical pyramid at the horizontal base of which we find pastors, the community, and the ‘Agende’ (ritual/tradition/Church), and whose verticals are constituted by the God-relation. Liturgical praxis takes place in the interplay of these poles, whereby in Evangelical Christianity it is usually the pastor who turns out to be the strong liturgical subject (even today in the context of the “Evangelisches Gottesdienstbuch”, 1999). Hence the question: How can we bring about a strengthening of the authority of the community in the God-community word-exchange of the liturgy? This requires liturgical instruction on at least three levels:
权威和礼仪的形成:关于一个改革的梦想,一套复杂的关系,和一个值得玩的游戏
权威的问题打断了礼仪实践和礼仪形成之间不言而喻的关系。它使原本隐藏的东西变得可见。隐性行为者和隐性权力结构都变得可识别。宗教改革是一场通过质疑先前占主导地位的权力结构而变得强大起来的运动。在礼仪上,它意味着礼仪崇拜的规范中心,只有两个活跃的主题:上帝和社区。无论如何,这就是我们如何描述改革者的礼仪梦想,路德在1544年托高教堂奉献布道中特别表达了这一点。当然,这个梦想在任何时候都不是现实。因为首先是牧师控制了礼拜仪式;从一开始,福音派崇拜就受到了横向的礼仪交流的威胁,这种交流倾向于与社区一起,甚至把“上帝”变成了礼仪的次要主题。因此,有必要为那些在礼仪中扮演角色的人描绘一幅更现实的画面。这就形成了一个礼仪金字塔,在它的水平底部,我们可以找到牧师、社区和“议程”(仪式/传统/教会),而它的垂直部分是由上帝关系构成的。礼仪实践发生在这些极点的相互作用中,因此在福音派基督教中,通常是牧师成为强大的礼仪主体(即使在今天的“Evangelisches Gottesdienstbuch”,1999的背景下)。因此问题来了:我们怎样才能在礼仪的神与团体话语的交换中,加强团体的权威?这至少需要三个层面的礼仪指导:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Liturgica
Studia Liturgica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信