High-Performance-Low-Invasion Fluids Technology Enhances, Optimizes Drilling Efficiency in the Gulf of Suez - Egypt

Y. A. Mohamed, Mahmoud Mohamed Kheir, Ayman Abd El-ghany Al-Zahry, Ayman Salama, A. Ouda, Lotfi Ibrahim Abou El Maati, Mohamed Farouk Ahmed, Sally Ahmed Mohamed
{"title":"High-Performance-Low-Invasion Fluids Technology Enhances, Optimizes Drilling Efficiency in the Gulf of Suez - Egypt","authors":"Y. A. Mohamed, Mahmoud Mohamed Kheir, Ayman Abd El-ghany Al-Zahry, Ayman Salama, A. Ouda, Lotfi Ibrahim Abou El Maati, Mohamed Farouk Ahmed, Sally Ahmed Mohamed","doi":"10.2118/204743-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Objectives / Scope: The main objective of this paper is to characterize the drilled shale formation in order to select and propose a \"tailored\" High Performance Low Invasion Fluids (HPLIF) system aided by Bridging Particles Optimization Tool (BPOT)(5),(6)(9)(11), capable of maximize hole stability in pressure depleted sands, allowing optimized well design through reactive and dispersible shale formations(7)(8) that eliminated one casing section, and to replace Oil Base Mud (OBM) and avoid its HSE issues related to use it, consequently, reduce formation damage, eliminate waste management cost, minimizing Non Productive Time (NPT) and finally enhances Drilling performance.\n Methods, Procedures, Process: This paper explain the reactivity information about Shale Samples recovered from different wells drilled in the-GOS-Egypt followed by extensive laboratory testing done(1) in order to characterize the main clay minerals presented in the samples using X-Ray Diffraction-(XRD) technology and their meso-and micro-structure by Scanning-Electron-Microscope-(SEM) and their reactivity to compare the inhibition efficiency of the proposed-(HPLIF)-System with Blank and Conventional Water-Base-Fluid-System. The reactivity of the cuttings was assessed by Dispersion, Swelling and Hardness tests. Field application experienced (HPLIF) System combined with Well-Bore Strengthening Materials (WSM) gives the required protection against induced losses and reducing the risk of differential sticking problems when mud overbalance is above 2500 psi(5), (6)(9)(11).\n Results, Observations, Conclusions: Compared with the use of conventional fluid systems, Field data demonstrated the successful application of (HPLIF) System combined with (WSM) and shows a great success during drilling through reactive clays, dispersive shale, naturally micro fractured(8), and depleted sand formations in many wells drilled in the GOS(2), (3), (4). Drilling operations reported no differential sticking, or wellbore instability issues even at highly mud overbalance or at highly deviated wells. The first challenged well R1-63 was drilled about 2391 ft, through 8.5\" hole using 9.8-10.01 ppg using (HPLIF) system, penetrating through Thebes, Esna Shale, Sudr, Brown Lime Stone, Matulla, Nubia\"A\" Sand and Nubia \"B\" without any down-hole losses. Additionally, there was no sticking tendency experienced during drilling or while recording pressure points. The Non Productive Time NPT showed a reduction by about 19.2%. Finally, it ran and was cemented the \"7\" Liner in open hole successfully without problem. For the second challenged case well # 2, the Open hole was exposed to (HPLIF) water based mud system for a long period of time while rig repairing, rig switching, and during drilling operation. The well had 6\" hole from 12,752 To/14,945 (2193.0ft) through Red bed, Thebes Esna, Sudr, Matulla and Nubia Sand formations with max inclination 68.6° and bottom hole temperature 325°F using 10.0-10.5 ppg (HPLIF) system, the 4.5\"liner successfully was ran, cemented without any problems. The-HPLIF-System has also been shown to give excellent wellbore stability in brittle shales Fm where bedding planes or micro-fractures can become pressurized with mud, leading to wellbore instability. This innovation avoids induced lost circulation and differential sticking when the mud overbalance is expected to be greater than ±2500 psi. Additionally, the proposed solution enhances the drilling operation, reduces the waste management costs, eliminates a possible additional casing string, and finally minimizes the (NPT) which reflects on the overall cost of drilling these challenged wells.\n","PeriodicalId":11320,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","volume":"03 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Tue, November 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204743-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives / Scope: The main objective of this paper is to characterize the drilled shale formation in order to select and propose a "tailored" High Performance Low Invasion Fluids (HPLIF) system aided by Bridging Particles Optimization Tool (BPOT)(5),(6)(9)(11), capable of maximize hole stability in pressure depleted sands, allowing optimized well design through reactive and dispersible shale formations(7)(8) that eliminated one casing section, and to replace Oil Base Mud (OBM) and avoid its HSE issues related to use it, consequently, reduce formation damage, eliminate waste management cost, minimizing Non Productive Time (NPT) and finally enhances Drilling performance. Methods, Procedures, Process: This paper explain the reactivity information about Shale Samples recovered from different wells drilled in the-GOS-Egypt followed by extensive laboratory testing done(1) in order to characterize the main clay minerals presented in the samples using X-Ray Diffraction-(XRD) technology and their meso-and micro-structure by Scanning-Electron-Microscope-(SEM) and their reactivity to compare the inhibition efficiency of the proposed-(HPLIF)-System with Blank and Conventional Water-Base-Fluid-System. The reactivity of the cuttings was assessed by Dispersion, Swelling and Hardness tests. Field application experienced (HPLIF) System combined with Well-Bore Strengthening Materials (WSM) gives the required protection against induced losses and reducing the risk of differential sticking problems when mud overbalance is above 2500 psi(5), (6)(9)(11). Results, Observations, Conclusions: Compared with the use of conventional fluid systems, Field data demonstrated the successful application of (HPLIF) System combined with (WSM) and shows a great success during drilling through reactive clays, dispersive shale, naturally micro fractured(8), and depleted sand formations in many wells drilled in the GOS(2), (3), (4). Drilling operations reported no differential sticking, or wellbore instability issues even at highly mud overbalance or at highly deviated wells. The first challenged well R1-63 was drilled about 2391 ft, through 8.5" hole using 9.8-10.01 ppg using (HPLIF) system, penetrating through Thebes, Esna Shale, Sudr, Brown Lime Stone, Matulla, Nubia"A" Sand and Nubia "B" without any down-hole losses. Additionally, there was no sticking tendency experienced during drilling or while recording pressure points. The Non Productive Time NPT showed a reduction by about 19.2%. Finally, it ran and was cemented the "7" Liner in open hole successfully without problem. For the second challenged case well # 2, the Open hole was exposed to (HPLIF) water based mud system for a long period of time while rig repairing, rig switching, and during drilling operation. The well had 6" hole from 12,752 To/14,945 (2193.0ft) through Red bed, Thebes Esna, Sudr, Matulla and Nubia Sand formations with max inclination 68.6° and bottom hole temperature 325°F using 10.0-10.5 ppg (HPLIF) system, the 4.5"liner successfully was ran, cemented without any problems. The-HPLIF-System has also been shown to give excellent wellbore stability in brittle shales Fm where bedding planes or micro-fractures can become pressurized with mud, leading to wellbore instability. This innovation avoids induced lost circulation and differential sticking when the mud overbalance is expected to be greater than ±2500 psi. Additionally, the proposed solution enhances the drilling operation, reduces the waste management costs, eliminates a possible additional casing string, and finally minimizes the (NPT) which reflects on the overall cost of drilling these challenged wells.
高性能低侵入流体技术提高了苏伊士-埃及海湾的钻井效率
目标/范围:本文的主要目的是对已钻探的页岩地层进行表征,以便在桥接颗粒优化工具(BPOT)(5)、(6)、(9)(11)的辅助下,选择并提出一种“量身定制”的高性能低侵入流体(HPLIF)系统,该系统能够在压力枯竭的砂岩中最大限度地提高井眼稳定性,通过反应性和分散性页岩地层(7)(8)进行优化井设计,从而消除一个套管段。替代油基泥浆(OBM),避免使用相关的HSE问题,从而减少地层损害,消除废物管理成本,最大限度地减少非生产时间(NPT),最终提高钻井性能。方法、程序、过程:本文解释了从gos - egypt的不同井中回收的页岩样品的反应性信息,随后进行了大量的实验室测试(1),以便使用x射线衍射(XRD)技术表征样品中的主要粘土矿物,通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)表征样品的细看和微观结构,并比较了所提出的-(HPLIF)体系与空白和常规水基-流体体系的抑制效率。通过分散性、溶胀性和硬度测试来评价岩屑的反应性。现场应用经验丰富的(HPLIF)系统与井眼强化材料(WSM)相结合,在泥浆过平衡超过2500 psi时,可以提供必要的保护,防止漏失,降低压差卡钻问题的风险。结果、观察、结论:与常规流体系统相比,现场数据表明,HPLIF系统与WSM系统的结合应用取得了成功,并在GOS地区的许多井中(2)、(3)、(4)钻进活性粘土、分散性页岩、天然微裂缝(8)和枯竭砂层时取得了巨大成功。钻井作业报告称,即使在泥浆高度过平衡或大斜度井中,也没有出现差动卡钻或井筒不稳定问题。第一口挑战井R1-63钻了2391英尺,通过8.5英寸的井眼,使用9.8-10.01 ppg (HPLIF)系统,穿透了Thebes、Esna页岩、Sudr、Brown Lime Stone、Matulla、Nubia“A”砂和Nubia“B”,没有任何井下损失。此外,在钻井过程中或记录压力点时,没有出现粘连现象。非生产时间NPT减少了19.2%。最后,在裸眼井中成功下入并固井了“7”尾管,没有任何问题。对于第二个问题井# 2,在钻机维修、钻机切换和钻井作业期间,裸眼井长时间暴露在(HPLIF)水基泥浆体系中。该井在12752至14945(2193.0英尺)深度下有6英寸井眼,穿过Red层、Thebes Esna、Sudr、Matulla和Nubia砂层,最大倾角68.6°,井底温度325°F,使用10.0-10.5 ppg (HPLIF)系统,4.5英寸尾管成功下入,固井没有任何问题。hplif系统还被证明在脆性页岩中具有出色的井筒稳定性,在这些页岩中,层理面或微裂缝可能被泥浆加压,导致井筒不稳定。当泥浆过平衡大于±2500psi时,该技术可避免漏失和压差卡钻。此外,该解决方案提高了钻井作业效率,降低了废物管理成本,消除了额外的套管柱,最终最大限度地减少了NPT,这反映了钻井这些困难井的总成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信