Improving Emergency Response with Better and Faster Remote Monitoring

P. Neri, R. Philo
{"title":"Improving Emergency Response with Better and Faster Remote Monitoring","authors":"P. Neri, R. Philo","doi":"10.4043/29713-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Offshore drilling is reaching for targets further from shore, at greater depths and in more hazardous geological settings such as in proximity to salt. All these factors heighten the risk of poorly managed mishaps evolving into a major emergency. Onshore monitoring centers observe numerous data feeds from the rig, analyzing the information for indicators of potentially dangerous situations. Such centers provide a broad cross-section of expertise to assist in understanding a problem and suggesting remedies. As MWD / LWD took hold in the 1990s, automatic data transfer protocols were used to interrogate servers on the rig and collect data waiting to be transmitted. This would deliver bursts of data 10 to 15 seconds after being acquired on the rig. To offer proper support in emergency situations, data needed to be lag-free. More data channels were needed to get a full picture. A complete re-think of the process to move data from rig to shore was needed. A new standard was developed and published that addressed the specific needs for 2-way data connections for offshore oil & gas, supporting streaming with 1-second lag times, and using one tenth of the bandwidth. This was achieved by defining a compact binary transfer with practically no overhead in the transmission process. A full-scale test was conducted to compare legacy data transmittal processes with the new standard, running both systems in parallel from the same drilling rig to the same onshore facility. The test confirmed the expected 10 to 15 second lag to retrieve data using the legacy approach. The new protocol delivered constant data flows with a lag time as little as 1 to 1.2 seconds after being acquired on the rig. Staff monitoring the data onshore could discuss observations contemporaneously with the rig crew since both were looking at the same data at the same time. In the event of a developing emergency affecting a deep-water drilling operation, the ability to share critical data readings in true real time among a broad constituency of shore-based actors together with the rig crew dramatically improves the ability to reach a fact-based conclusion among all parties in a timely manner. The standard transfer protocol will continue to evolve to better serve the needs of drillers and operators, and their effective management of emergencies.","PeriodicalId":10927,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29713-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore drilling is reaching for targets further from shore, at greater depths and in more hazardous geological settings such as in proximity to salt. All these factors heighten the risk of poorly managed mishaps evolving into a major emergency. Onshore monitoring centers observe numerous data feeds from the rig, analyzing the information for indicators of potentially dangerous situations. Such centers provide a broad cross-section of expertise to assist in understanding a problem and suggesting remedies. As MWD / LWD took hold in the 1990s, automatic data transfer protocols were used to interrogate servers on the rig and collect data waiting to be transmitted. This would deliver bursts of data 10 to 15 seconds after being acquired on the rig. To offer proper support in emergency situations, data needed to be lag-free. More data channels were needed to get a full picture. A complete re-think of the process to move data from rig to shore was needed. A new standard was developed and published that addressed the specific needs for 2-way data connections for offshore oil & gas, supporting streaming with 1-second lag times, and using one tenth of the bandwidth. This was achieved by defining a compact binary transfer with practically no overhead in the transmission process. A full-scale test was conducted to compare legacy data transmittal processes with the new standard, running both systems in parallel from the same drilling rig to the same onshore facility. The test confirmed the expected 10 to 15 second lag to retrieve data using the legacy approach. The new protocol delivered constant data flows with a lag time as little as 1 to 1.2 seconds after being acquired on the rig. Staff monitoring the data onshore could discuss observations contemporaneously with the rig crew since both were looking at the same data at the same time. In the event of a developing emergency affecting a deep-water drilling operation, the ability to share critical data readings in true real time among a broad constituency of shore-based actors together with the rig crew dramatically improves the ability to reach a fact-based conclusion among all parties in a timely manner. The standard transfer protocol will continue to evolve to better serve the needs of drillers and operators, and their effective management of emergencies.
通过更好更快的远程监测改进应急响应
海上钻探的目标距离海岸更远,深度更深,地质环境更危险,比如靠近盐。所有这些因素都增加了管理不善的事故演变成重大紧急情况的风险。陆上监测中心观察来自钻井平台的大量数据,分析潜在危险情况的指标信息。这些中心提供广泛的专业知识,以帮助理解问题并提出补救建议。随着随钻随钻技术在20世纪90年代的发展,自动数据传输协议被用于询问钻机上的服务器,并收集等待传输的数据。这将在钻井平台上获得数据后10到15秒内发送数据。为了在紧急情况下提供适当的支持,数据必须无滞后。需要更多的数据通道来获得全貌。需要对将数据从钻井平台转移到岸上的过程进行彻底的重新思考。针对海上油气行业双向数据连接的特殊需求,开发并发布了一项新标准,该标准支持延迟时间为1秒的流传输,带宽仅为十分之一。这是通过定义一个紧凑的二进制传输来实现的,在传输过程中几乎没有开销。为了比较传统数据传输过程和新标准,进行了全面测试,从同一钻机到同一陆上设施并行运行两种系统。测试证实,使用传统方法检索数据的预期延迟为10到15秒。新协议提供恒定的数据流,在钻机上获取数据后,延迟时间仅为1至1.2秒。陆上监测数据的工作人员可以与钻井人员同时讨论观察结果,因为双方同时查看相同的数据。在发生影响深水钻井作业的突发事件时,能够在广泛的岸上参与者和钻井人员之间实时共享关键数据读数,极大地提高了各方及时得出基于事实的结论的能力。标准传输协议将继续发展,以更好地满足钻井人员和操作人员的需求,以及他们对紧急情况的有效管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信