Managerial effectiveness and its correlates in Indian banking industry

Q1 Social Sciences
P. Negi, R. Dangwal
{"title":"Managerial effectiveness and its correlates in Indian banking industry","authors":"P. Negi, R. Dangwal","doi":"10.1108/prr-05-2018-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nVarious scams and swindles in banks demand effective supervision and competent workforce, as it involves with workplace accountability and undertaking customer support services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the managerial effectiveness of selected public, private and foreign banks in India.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn total, 467 questionnaires from (middle and top-level) managers of (five public, five private and five foreign banks) fifteen banks have been considered. The descriptive statistics, t-test and ANOVA are used to differentiate each sector of banks.\n\n\nFindings\nThe significant difference denoted in terms of managerial effectiveness among banks. The results revealed that managers of public banks are action-oriented and receptive to feedback, whereas the manager of private sector banks embodies self-disclosure and perceptiveness. The correlates, namely, action-orientation, self-disclosure and receptivity to feedback evident significant among foreign banks.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe consideration and application of such correlates would surely help managers, decision-makers and practitioners to enhance their effectiveness. Human resource professionals can use these results to develop programmes and policies for better management.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is imperative as it compares the behaviour of managers of public, private and foreign banks individually. The findings demonstrate that correlates of managerial effectiveness significantly differ among the banks.\n","PeriodicalId":32387,"journal":{"name":"PSU Research Review","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSU Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/prr-05-2018-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Various scams and swindles in banks demand effective supervision and competent workforce, as it involves with workplace accountability and undertaking customer support services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the managerial effectiveness of selected public, private and foreign banks in India. Design/methodology/approach In total, 467 questionnaires from (middle and top-level) managers of (five public, five private and five foreign banks) fifteen banks have been considered. The descriptive statistics, t-test and ANOVA are used to differentiate each sector of banks. Findings The significant difference denoted in terms of managerial effectiveness among banks. The results revealed that managers of public banks are action-oriented and receptive to feedback, whereas the manager of private sector banks embodies self-disclosure and perceptiveness. The correlates, namely, action-orientation, self-disclosure and receptivity to feedback evident significant among foreign banks. Practical implications The consideration and application of such correlates would surely help managers, decision-makers and practitioners to enhance their effectiveness. Human resource professionals can use these results to develop programmes and policies for better management. Originality/value The study is imperative as it compares the behaviour of managers of public, private and foreign banks individually. The findings demonstrate that correlates of managerial effectiveness significantly differ among the banks.
印度银行业管理效能及其相关因素
银行的各种诈骗和诈骗需要有效的监管和称职的员工队伍,因为它涉及工作场所的问责制和承担客户支持服务。本文的目的是研究印度选定的公共,私人和外国银行的管理有效性。设计/方法/方法总共考虑了15家银行(5家公共银行、5家私营银行和5家外资银行)(中层和高层)经理的467份问卷。利用描述性统计、t检验和方差分析对银行的各个部门进行了区分。各银行在管理效能方面存在显著差异。结果表明,公共银行的管理者具有行动导向和乐于接受反馈的特点,而私营银行的管理者则具有自我披露和感知能力。在外资银行中,行动导向、自我披露和接受反馈的相关性显著。实际意义考虑和应用这些相关因素,必将有助于管理者、决策者和从业者提高其有效性。人力资源专业人员可以利用这些结果制定更好管理的方案和政策。独创性/价值这项研究是必要的,因为它对公共银行、私人银行和外资银行经理的行为进行了单独比较。研究结果表明,管理有效性的相关因素在银行之间存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信