توثيق الرواة في حالات مخصوصة عند الإمام أحمد بن حنبل وأثره في الحكم على مروياتهم

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
AbdelAziz Shaker Hamdan Al Kubaisi
{"title":"توثيق الرواة في حالات مخصوصة عند الإمام أحمد بن حنبل وأثره في الحكم على مروياتهم","authors":"AbdelAziz Shaker Hamdan Al Kubaisi","doi":"10.1163/22321969-12340111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis research tackles the documentation of a weak narrator in certain cases and specific bodies, and its impact on judging the narrator, determining his rank, knowing the degree of hadiths authenticity, distinguishing hadiths, and investigating all that in the light of Imam Ahmad’s extrapolation of sayings and rulings, which are among the oldest sources on hadith weaknesses and narrators. These compilations are a major reference for those who came after him, and for the classifications that adopted collecting his sayings, questions of his students to him, the analysis of those sayings and conclusions drawn from his sayings, highlighting its implications, and comparing that with that of other hadith narrators and critics. This matter is one of the most majestic issues of hadith sciences that should be well taken care of and singled out for classification, due to the need for it in weighing hadith authenticity and its narrators. The research has showed the need to take care of relative documentation that is associated with a sheikh, student, place, time, or others, because of its great impact on the narrator and the narrative, what is narrated. It is imperative to consider these aspects when judging narrators and hadiths. Some narrators according to Imam Ahmad may be in a different situation as their sheikh’s circumstances are different, or different place of their narrative, or time difference of narration. The author has tracked down these aspects and has compared them with other opinions of hadith critics who may agree or disagree with him. The research has also showed that Imam Ahmad had done relative documentation of some narrators comparing himself to other narrators. The researcher has concluded that most of these relative documenters are peers in terms of age and hadith memorization, and that their authenticity ranks are similar to each other. Hadith narrators and critics may differ with Imam Ahmad in this comparison, or agree with him.","PeriodicalId":40915,"journal":{"name":"Al-Bayan-Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Bayan-Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research tackles the documentation of a weak narrator in certain cases and specific bodies, and its impact on judging the narrator, determining his rank, knowing the degree of hadiths authenticity, distinguishing hadiths, and investigating all that in the light of Imam Ahmad’s extrapolation of sayings and rulings, which are among the oldest sources on hadith weaknesses and narrators. These compilations are a major reference for those who came after him, and for the classifications that adopted collecting his sayings, questions of his students to him, the analysis of those sayings and conclusions drawn from his sayings, highlighting its implications, and comparing that with that of other hadith narrators and critics. This matter is one of the most majestic issues of hadith sciences that should be well taken care of and singled out for classification, due to the need for it in weighing hadith authenticity and its narrators. The research has showed the need to take care of relative documentation that is associated with a sheikh, student, place, time, or others, because of its great impact on the narrator and the narrative, what is narrated. It is imperative to consider these aspects when judging narrators and hadiths. Some narrators according to Imam Ahmad may be in a different situation as their sheikh’s circumstances are different, or different place of their narrative, or time difference of narration. The author has tracked down these aspects and has compared them with other opinions of hadith critics who may agree or disagree with him. The research has also showed that Imam Ahmad had done relative documentation of some narrators comparing himself to other narrators. The researcher has concluded that most of these relative documenters are peers in terms of age and hadith memorization, and that their authenticity ranks are similar to each other. Hadith narrators and critics may differ with Imam Ahmad in this comparison, or agree with him.
伊玛目艾哈迈德·本·汉布尔在特定案件中的记录及其对其直升机的判断的影响
本研究处理了在某些情况下和特定机构中软弱叙述者的记录,以及它对判断叙述者的影响,确定他的等级,了解圣训的真实性程度,区分圣训,并根据伊玛目艾哈迈德的说法和裁决进行调查,这些都是关于圣训弱点和叙述者的最古老的来源之一。这些汇编是他之后的人的主要参考,也是分类的主要参考,收集他的言论,他的学生向他提出的问题,对这些言论的分析以及从他的言论中得出的结论,突出其含义,并将其与其他圣训叙述者和评论家的观点进行比较。这个问题是圣训科学中最重要的问题之一,应该得到很好的照顾,并单独分类,因为它需要衡量圣训的真实性和它的叙述者。研究表明,需要注意与酋长,学生,地点,时间或其他相关的文件,因为它对叙述者和叙述的影响很大。在判断叙述者和圣训时,必须考虑这些方面。根据伊玛目艾哈迈德的说法,一些叙述者可能处于不同的情况,因为他们的酋长的情况不同,或者他们叙述的地点不同,或者叙述的时间不同。作者追踪了这些方面,并将它们与圣训评论家的其他观点进行了比较,这些人可能同意或不同意他的观点。研究还表明,伊玛目艾哈迈德做了一些叙述者比较自己和其他叙述者的相关文件。研究人员得出结论,这些相对文献的大多数人在年龄和圣训记忆方面是同龄人,他们的真实性等级彼此相似。圣训叙述者和评论家在这种比较中可能与伊玛目艾哈迈德不同,或者同意他的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信