{"title":"The End of Blackness: Returning the Souls of Black Folk to Their Rightful Owners","authors":"D. D. Murphey","doi":"10.5860/choice.42-1252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The End of Blackness: Returning the Souls of Black Folk to Their Rightful Owners Debra J. Dickerson Anchor Books, 2004 There is something in this book for just about everyone, depending upon a reader's proclivities. Those who read it to find ammunition against whites will find it there. Those who wish to see a black author's own characterizations of what is to her the deeply flawed behavior of many other blacks will find that there, too. Those who would like to see some emphasis, at least, on the decent and responsible behavior of a large number of people in either race will be disappointed, but apparently Dickerson feels the negatives exist in such abundance that they deserve the center of attention. Ironically, she is critical of \"the hysterical black polemicist [who] is the snarling German shepherd that blacks loose on racism,\" but that is a description a reader can't help but feel fits Dickerson herself throughout much of the book. Looking at the world through a haughty intellectualism that gives her an Olympian perspective and allows her to apply much pop psychology, she finds fuel for dissatisfaction with almost everybody. Those who come under her scalpel include the current black leadership; the \"Movement Generation\"; the black \"bourgeoisie\"; the great bulk of black males; black women, who despite being the work horses of their race have many undesirable qualities, according to Dickerson; and whites, for their racism, \"structuralized greed, entrenched privilege, and xenophobia.\" There is in all of this considerable grist for thought, and for good reason: Dickerson is in a position to have much to say. She is a sharecropper's daughter who graduated from Harvard Law School, and the wife in an interracial marriage. Her style is articulate (and she takes pleasure in an occasional sally into intellectualized smut). Even though there is much to criticize her for, her negativity has a unique value in light of the circumstances in which Americans find themselves today: it brings her to say things that few others are able to say in a society stifled by political correctness (i.e., by an insistence upon ideological conformity). Slurs against whites are politically correct, so there isn't much she can dish out along those lines that hasn't already been said. But that isn't true of her criticisms of today's black population. Her observations there offer a window into a forbidden subject. In this review, it will be valuable to examine what she has to say about whites, but most especially about blacks. Her book's content has significance for reasons Dickerson herself may not intend. If her critique is to be taken seriously, she is suggesting something quite startling and unexpected: that there is much that is problematic about the \"moral high ground\" that has allowed the Civil Rights Movement in the United States to sweep all before it. Those reading her observations can't help but entertain questions about the moral justification for the process of social and legal change that has held powerful sway within American society since World War II. But first, a digression. It would be unseemly to put off until the end of the review a discussion of the message that is ostensibly Dickerson's main reason for writing. She intends a message of uplift. Instead of focusing on racial justice, she says, American blacks should focus on living, on \"actualizing as individuals.\" There is much they can do: pursue \"good citizenship,\" improve their neighborhoods through self-help projects, excel academically, enlist in the armed services, adopt neglected children, educate voters. To accomplish this, \"black people must take the reins of their uplift in their own hands.\" \"No longer can standards of conduct and morality be lower for blacks than for whites,\" she says; \"crime is crime, sloth is sloth, and merit is mostly measurable.\" seen most broadly, they should \"give the devil his due\" by recognizing \"the grandeur\" of Western culture. …","PeriodicalId":52486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
The End of Blackness: Returning the Souls of Black Folk to Their Rightful Owners Debra J. Dickerson Anchor Books, 2004 There is something in this book for just about everyone, depending upon a reader's proclivities. Those who read it to find ammunition against whites will find it there. Those who wish to see a black author's own characterizations of what is to her the deeply flawed behavior of many other blacks will find that there, too. Those who would like to see some emphasis, at least, on the decent and responsible behavior of a large number of people in either race will be disappointed, but apparently Dickerson feels the negatives exist in such abundance that they deserve the center of attention. Ironically, she is critical of "the hysterical black polemicist [who] is the snarling German shepherd that blacks loose on racism," but that is a description a reader can't help but feel fits Dickerson herself throughout much of the book. Looking at the world through a haughty intellectualism that gives her an Olympian perspective and allows her to apply much pop psychology, she finds fuel for dissatisfaction with almost everybody. Those who come under her scalpel include the current black leadership; the "Movement Generation"; the black "bourgeoisie"; the great bulk of black males; black women, who despite being the work horses of their race have many undesirable qualities, according to Dickerson; and whites, for their racism, "structuralized greed, entrenched privilege, and xenophobia." There is in all of this considerable grist for thought, and for good reason: Dickerson is in a position to have much to say. She is a sharecropper's daughter who graduated from Harvard Law School, and the wife in an interracial marriage. Her style is articulate (and she takes pleasure in an occasional sally into intellectualized smut). Even though there is much to criticize her for, her negativity has a unique value in light of the circumstances in which Americans find themselves today: it brings her to say things that few others are able to say in a society stifled by political correctness (i.e., by an insistence upon ideological conformity). Slurs against whites are politically correct, so there isn't much she can dish out along those lines that hasn't already been said. But that isn't true of her criticisms of today's black population. Her observations there offer a window into a forbidden subject. In this review, it will be valuable to examine what she has to say about whites, but most especially about blacks. Her book's content has significance for reasons Dickerson herself may not intend. If her critique is to be taken seriously, she is suggesting something quite startling and unexpected: that there is much that is problematic about the "moral high ground" that has allowed the Civil Rights Movement in the United States to sweep all before it. Those reading her observations can't help but entertain questions about the moral justification for the process of social and legal change that has held powerful sway within American society since World War II. But first, a digression. It would be unseemly to put off until the end of the review a discussion of the message that is ostensibly Dickerson's main reason for writing. She intends a message of uplift. Instead of focusing on racial justice, she says, American blacks should focus on living, on "actualizing as individuals." There is much they can do: pursue "good citizenship," improve their neighborhoods through self-help projects, excel academically, enlist in the armed services, adopt neglected children, educate voters. To accomplish this, "black people must take the reins of their uplift in their own hands." "No longer can standards of conduct and morality be lower for blacks than for whites," she says; "crime is crime, sloth is sloth, and merit is mostly measurable." seen most broadly, they should "give the devil his due" by recognizing "the grandeur" of Western culture. …
《黑人的终结:把黑人的灵魂还给他们应有的主人》黛布拉·j·迪克森,锚出版社,2004。这本书中有一些东西适合每个人,取决于读者的倾向。那些为了找到反对白人的弹药而读这本书的人会在那里找到它。那些希望看到一位黑人作家对她认为的许多其他黑人有严重缺陷的行为的自己的描述的人也会发现。有些人希望看到,至少在这两种种族中,有大量的人表现出体面和负责任的行为,他们会感到失望,但显然迪克森认为,负面因素如此之多,值得关注。具有讽刺意味的是,她批评“歇斯底里的黑人雄辩家是黑人在种族主义问题上放任不管的咆哮的德国牧羊犬”,但读者不禁觉得,这种描述与迪克森本人在书中的大部分内容都很吻合。她以一种高傲的理智主义看待这个世界,这种理智主义赋予了她奥运选手的视角,并使她能够运用许多流行心理学,她找到了对几乎所有人不满的燃料。那些在她手术刀下的人包括现在的黑人领导人;“运动一代”;黑人“资产阶级”;大量的黑人男性;根据迪克森的说法,黑人女性尽管是他们种族的主力,但也有许多不受欢迎的品质;而白人,因为他们的种族主义,“结构化的贪婪、根深蒂固的特权和仇外心理”。所有这些都有值得思考的地方,而且有充分的理由:迪克森有很多话要说。她是一个佃农的女儿,毕业于哈佛法学院,是一个异族婚姻的妻子。她的风格是清晰的(她喜欢偶尔进入知性的色情作品)。尽管她有很多值得批评的地方,但鉴于美国人今天所处的环境,她的消极态度有其独特的价值:这让她说出了在一个被政治正确(即坚持意识形态的一致性)扼杀的社会中很少有人能说出的话。对白人的诽谤在政治上是正确的,所以她没有太多可以沿着这些已经说过的路线发表的言论。但她对今天黑人人口的批评并非如此。她在那里的观察为一个被禁止的话题提供了一扇窗。在这篇评论中,审视她对白人的看法,尤其是对黑人的看法,将是很有价值的。她的书的内容具有重要意义,原因可能不是迪克森自己想要的。如果认真对待她的批评,她提出了一些相当令人吃惊和意想不到的东西:美国民权运动(Civil Rights Movement)曾经横扫一切的“道德制高点”存在很多问题。那些读到她的评论的人不禁会提出这样的问题:自第二次世界大战以来,在美国社会中占据强大影响力的社会和法律变革过程的道德正当性。但首先,我们离题了。从表面上看,这是迪克森写作的主要原因,但把对这条信息的讨论推迟到评论的结尾是不恰当的。她想传达振奋人心的信息。她说,美国黑人应该关注生活,关注“作为个体的实现”,而不是关注种族正义。他们可以做很多事情:追求“好公民”,通过自助项目改善社区,在学业上取得优异成绩,参军,收养被忽视的儿童,教育选民。为了实现这一目标,“黑人必须把提升自己的缰绳掌握在自己手中。”“黑人的行为和道德标准不能再低于白人了,”她说;“犯罪就是犯罪,懒惰就是懒惰,优点大多是可以衡量的。”从更广泛的角度来看,他们应该承认西方文化的“伟大”,“给予魔鬼应有的惩罚”。…
期刊介绍:
The quarterly Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies (ISSN 0193-5941), which has been published regularly since 1976, is a peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to scholarly papers which present in depth information on contemporary issues of primarily international interest. The emphasis is on factual information rather than purely theoretical or historical papers, although it welcomes an historical approach to contemporary situations where this serves to clarify the causal background to present day problems.