Perbandingan Efektivitas Model STAD, TGT, DAN TTW Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa

Zelhendri Zen, Reflianto Reflianto, Syamsuar Syamsuar, Farida Ariani
{"title":"Perbandingan Efektivitas Model STAD, TGT, DAN TTW Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa","authors":"Zelhendri Zen, Reflianto Reflianto, Syamsuar Syamsuar, Farida Ariani","doi":"10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, interest in exploring the effectiveness of different cooperative learning models in promoting science learning outcomes for high school students has been increasing. The three most studied models are STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions), TGT (Teams-Games-Tournaments), and TTW (Think-Talk-Write). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the STAD, TGT, and TTW models on science learning outcomes of class VII students in junior high school. The research method was an experimental study with a comparative design. The results showed a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students taught using the three cooperative learning models. The TGT and TTW models did not show a significant difference in learning outcomes, although the TGT model showed better learning outcomes than the STAD and TTW models. This study also highlights the importance of considering specific learning objectives and student characteristics when selecting and adapting cooperative learning models. While the TTW and TGT models can be effective alternatives to the STAD model in improving science learning outcomes for junior high school students, further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and generalizability of these models in different contexts","PeriodicalId":34325,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogi","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, interest in exploring the effectiveness of different cooperative learning models in promoting science learning outcomes for high school students has been increasing. The three most studied models are STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions), TGT (Teams-Games-Tournaments), and TTW (Think-Talk-Write). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the STAD, TGT, and TTW models on science learning outcomes of class VII students in junior high school. The research method was an experimental study with a comparative design. The results showed a significant difference in science learning outcomes among students taught using the three cooperative learning models. The TGT and TTW models did not show a significant difference in learning outcomes, although the TGT model showed better learning outcomes than the STAD and TTW models. This study also highlights the importance of considering specific learning objectives and student characteristics when selecting and adapting cooperative learning models. While the TTW and TGT models can be effective alternatives to the STAD model in improving science learning outcomes for junior high school students, further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and generalizability of these models in different contexts
STAD模型、TGT和TTW对学生的科学学习结果的比较
近年来,探索不同合作学习模式在促进高中生科学学习成果方面的有效性的兴趣越来越大。研究最多的三种模式是STAD(学生团队成就部门),TGT(团队-游戏-比赛)和TTW(思考-谈话-写作)。本研究的目的是比较STAD、TGT和TTW模型对初七班学生科学学习成果的影响。研究方法为比较设计的实验研究。结果显示,使用三种合作学习模式的学生在科学学习成果上存在显著差异。TGT模型的学习效果优于STAD模型和TTW模型,但TGT模型的学习效果差异不显著。本研究还强调了在选择和适应合作学习模式时考虑特定学习目标和学生特征的重要性。虽然TTW和TGT模型可以作为STAD模型的有效替代模型来改善初中生科学学习成果,但需要进一步研究这些模型在不同情境下的长期有效性和可推广性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信