Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Profiles of Patients with or without Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Suman Biswas, M. Mahmood, N. Sheikh, Md Fakhrul Islam Khaled, A. Bari, A. Abdullah, Rashedul Islam, Sanjida Ansari, Mohammad Safiuddin
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Profiles of Patients with or without Left Main Coronary Artery Disease","authors":"Suman Biswas, M. Mahmood, N. Sheikh, Md Fakhrul Islam Khaled, A. Bari, A. Abdullah, Rashedul Islam, Sanjida Ansari, Mohammad Safiuddin","doi":"10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Left main coronary artery disease constitutes highest risk lesion subset of CAD population. Flow dynamics and pathophysiology in the left main coronary artery are different from that of the other coronary arteries. So traditional risk factors might interact differently with left main artery resulting in different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared to others. Anatomic pattern evaluation in left main coronary artery disease is important in deciding best management options. However, their pattern and profiles were variably shown in different studies with discrepant\nResults suggesting geographic variation and lead to evaluation of characteristics in our own population. Better understanding this specific problem might lead to further improvement in its management.\nMethods: It was an observational cross-sectional study. Ninety-one adult coronary artery disease patients over the period of one year who underwent invasive coronary angiogram were studied. Study subjects were divided into two groups after coronary angiogram: Left main (Group 1) and Non-left main (Group 2) CAD. Demographic data, risk factor profiles and angiographic patterns of both groups were compared to see if any statistically significant difference present or not.\nResults: The mean age and standard deviation in group 1 is 55.2±9.4 and in group 2 is 55.5±12.9; the comparative analysis showed no statistically significant difference. Most of the patients were male 69 (76%) and the comparative study showed statistically significant differences (p=0.046) which showed left main disease tended to be higher in male. Majority (64%) had BMI in normal range with no significant difference. Among the risk factors comparison, diabetes and family history of CAD showed significant association with the left main cohort (p<0.05). Non-ST elevated ACS was the most common presentation and significantly associated with the left main group (p<0.05). On coronary angiogram, there were 80 patients (87.92%) who had no left main artery involvement while 11 patients (12.08%) had left main disease. The comparative study of coronary artery involvement among the two groups reveals no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) but triple vessel disease was found more commonly than single and double vessel disease. Distal lesions (64%) were found more frequently than other types of left main stenosis followed by ostio-proximal lesion (36%).\nConclusion: In the patients with left main coronary artery disease, male gender, diabetes mellitus, positive family history and presentation with non-ST elevation ACS were found to be significantly associated. Distal left main lesion and triple vessel disease were commonly found.\nUniversity Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 3-9","PeriodicalId":23424,"journal":{"name":"University Heart Journal","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Left main coronary artery disease constitutes highest risk lesion subset of CAD population. Flow dynamics and pathophysiology in the left main coronary artery are different from that of the other coronary arteries. So traditional risk factors might interact differently with left main artery resulting in different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared to others. Anatomic pattern evaluation in left main coronary artery disease is important in deciding best management options. However, their pattern and profiles were variably shown in different studies with discrepant Results suggesting geographic variation and lead to evaluation of characteristics in our own population. Better understanding this specific problem might lead to further improvement in its management. Methods: It was an observational cross-sectional study. Ninety-one adult coronary artery disease patients over the period of one year who underwent invasive coronary angiogram were studied. Study subjects were divided into two groups after coronary angiogram: Left main (Group 1) and Non-left main (Group 2) CAD. Demographic data, risk factor profiles and angiographic patterns of both groups were compared to see if any statistically significant difference present or not. Results: The mean age and standard deviation in group 1 is 55.2±9.4 and in group 2 is 55.5±12.9; the comparative analysis showed no statistically significant difference. Most of the patients were male 69 (76%) and the comparative study showed statistically significant differences (p=0.046) which showed left main disease tended to be higher in male. Majority (64%) had BMI in normal range with no significant difference. Among the risk factors comparison, diabetes and family history of CAD showed significant association with the left main cohort (p<0.05). Non-ST elevated ACS was the most common presentation and significantly associated with the left main group (p<0.05). On coronary angiogram, there were 80 patients (87.92%) who had no left main artery involvement while 11 patients (12.08%) had left main disease. The comparative study of coronary artery involvement among the two groups reveals no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) but triple vessel disease was found more commonly than single and double vessel disease. Distal lesions (64%) were found more frequently than other types of left main stenosis followed by ostio-proximal lesion (36%). Conclusion: In the patients with left main coronary artery disease, male gender, diabetes mellitus, positive family history and presentation with non-ST elevation ACS were found to be significantly associated. Distal left main lesion and triple vessel disease were commonly found. University Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 3-9
有或无左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的临床与血管造影比较
背景:左主干冠状动脉病变是冠心病人群中最危险的病变亚群。左冠状动脉主干的血流动力学和病理生理与其他冠状动脉不同。所以传统的危险因素可能与左主干有不同的相互作用导致不同的临床和血管造影特征。左主干冠状动脉病变的解剖形态评价是决定最佳治疗方案的重要依据。然而,它们的模式和特征在不同的研究中表现出不同的差异,结果表明地理差异,并导致对我们自己人群特征的评估。更好地理解这一具体问题可能会导致其管理的进一步改进。方法:采用观察性横断面研究。本文对91例成年冠心病患者进行了为期一年的有创冠状动脉造影。研究对象经冠状动脉造影后分为左主干(1组)和非左主干(2组)冠心病组。比较两组的人口统计数据、危险因素概况和血管造影模式,看是否存在统计学上的显著差异。结果:1组患者的平均年龄为55.2±9.4,2组患者的平均年龄为55.5±12.9;比较分析无统计学差异。患者以男性69例(76%)居多,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.046),左侧主干病变男性发生率较高。大多数患者(64%)的BMI在正常范围内,差异无统计学意义。在危险因素比较中,糖尿病和冠心病家族史与左主队列有显著相关性(p0.05),但三支血管病变比单支和双支血管病变更常见。远端病变(64%)比其他类型的左主干狭窄更常见,其次是口近端病变(36%)。结论:左主干病变患者与男性、糖尿病、阳性家族史、非st段抬高型ACS有显著相关性。左主干远端病变和三支血管病变多见。大学心脏杂志2022;18 (1): 3 - 9
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信