Perspectives and drivers of modernisation of silviculture re-establishment in South Africa

M. Ramantswana, M. Brink, K. Little, R. Spinelli, P. Chirwa
{"title":"Perspectives and drivers of modernisation of silviculture re-establishment in South Africa","authors":"M. Ramantswana, M. Brink, K. Little, R. Spinelli, P. Chirwa","doi":"10.2989/20702620.2020.1819152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficient and cost-effective re-establishment practices are important parts of any sustainable forest re-establishment programme. Re-establishment activities include residue management (post-harvest slash), preparation of a planting position, planting, fertilisation and vegetation management. In South Africa, these activities are largely labour intensive, time-consuming and relatively costly. Although mechanisation of site preparation during afforestation was achieved in the mid to late 1990s, plantation re-establishment operations in South Africa have remained manually oriented. However, there have been notable technology developments over the past decade. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 66 experts (grower company specialists, foresters, contractors and machine manufacturers) to get their perspectives on modernisation of re-establishment activities in South Africa. Frequency distribution and chi-square test analysis found that two-thirds of the experts believed that re-establishment activities had progressed in terms of technology over the past decade. This development was reported as primarily due to the need to improve health and safety (91%), increase production whilst reducing costs (89%), improve stand productivity (quality) (86%), mitigate social (mainly labour) risks (80%) and reduce prevalent negative environmental impacts (50%). Key barriers to modernisation were identified as the capital cost of equipment (65%), reduction in employment opportunities (44%) and low utilisation of equipment due to seasonality of silviculture work (18%). Experts indicated that the efficiency of mechanised re-establishment equipment can be affected negatively by residues, high stumps and compaction of the site after harvesting. The results of this study will assist forestry stakeholders to make informed decisions when planning and implementing modernised silviculture operations.","PeriodicalId":21939,"journal":{"name":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","volume":"74 1","pages":"79 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2020.1819152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Efficient and cost-effective re-establishment practices are important parts of any sustainable forest re-establishment programme. Re-establishment activities include residue management (post-harvest slash), preparation of a planting position, planting, fertilisation and vegetation management. In South Africa, these activities are largely labour intensive, time-consuming and relatively costly. Although mechanisation of site preparation during afforestation was achieved in the mid to late 1990s, plantation re-establishment operations in South Africa have remained manually oriented. However, there have been notable technology developments over the past decade. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 66 experts (grower company specialists, foresters, contractors and machine manufacturers) to get their perspectives on modernisation of re-establishment activities in South Africa. Frequency distribution and chi-square test analysis found that two-thirds of the experts believed that re-establishment activities had progressed in terms of technology over the past decade. This development was reported as primarily due to the need to improve health and safety (91%), increase production whilst reducing costs (89%), improve stand productivity (quality) (86%), mitigate social (mainly labour) risks (80%) and reduce prevalent negative environmental impacts (50%). Key barriers to modernisation were identified as the capital cost of equipment (65%), reduction in employment opportunities (44%) and low utilisation of equipment due to seasonality of silviculture work (18%). Experts indicated that the efficiency of mechanised re-establishment equipment can be affected negatively by residues, high stumps and compaction of the site after harvesting. The results of this study will assist forestry stakeholders to make informed decisions when planning and implementing modernised silviculture operations.
南非造林重建现代化的前景和驱动因素
有效和具有成本效益的重建做法是任何可持续森林重建方案的重要组成部分。重建活动包括残留物管理(收获后的削减),准备种植位置,种植,施肥和植被管理。在南非,这些活动主要是劳力密集、耗时和相对昂贵的。虽然在1990年代中后期造林期间实现了场地准备的机械化,但南非的种植园重建业务仍然以人工为主。然而,在过去的十年里有了显著的技术发展。对66位专家(种植公司专家、林务员、承包商和机器制造商)进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们对南非重建活动现代化的看法。频率分布和卡方检验分析发现,三分之二的专家认为,在过去十年中,重建活动在技术方面取得了进展。据报告,这一发展主要是由于需要改善健康和安全(91%)、增加产量同时降低成本(89%)、提高林分生产率(质量)(86%)、减轻社会(主要是劳动)风险(80%)和减少普遍的负面环境影响(50%)。现代化的主要障碍被确定为设备的资本成本(65%)、就业机会的减少(44%)和由于造林工作的季节性而导致的设备利用率低(18%)。专家指出,机械化重建设备的效率可能会受到收获后残留物、高树桩和现场压实的负面影响。这项研究的结果将有助于林业利益相关者在规划和实施现代化造林业务时做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信