Increasing Pathways to Leadership for Black, Indigenous, and other Racially Minoritized Women

Maki Motapanyane, Irene Shankar
{"title":"Increasing Pathways to Leadership for Black, Indigenous, and other Racially Minoritized Women","authors":"Maki Motapanyane, Irene Shankar","doi":"10.7202/1096953ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leadership positions within post-secondary institutions (PSIs) remain elusive to women generally, and to Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women in particular. In this paper, we argue that pathways to leadership, particularly for non-traditional, non-normative and critical approaches that can come from the differently situated epistemic positioning of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women, are important as beginning steps towards progressively dismantling standardized Eurocentric, androcentric, and corporatized academic workplace cultures. This type of reform is essential preliminary work in the process toward greater equity and inclusivity in academic institutions. Note then that we are writing of a significant amount of substantive change needed to enact crucial initial reform, in tandem with, and beyond which we should continuously push for more radical transformation (Dryden 2022; Patel 2021). As such, we propose initiatives that universities can take to address some of the common gendered, racialized, and class-related exclusions and inequities evident in academic workplaces. This is in acknowledgement that academic institutions, having demonstrated a predilection for the co-optative and performative, are barely able to reform meaningfully, let alone engage the “transformation” and “decolonization” with which reform is often confused and erroneously conflated. Grounded within institutional research, we detail the commitments required from governing bodies, the changes necessary in academic decision-making spaces, the need for timely and transparent data collection infrastructure, and other institutional changes required to enhance the recruitment, hiring, and retention of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized faculty and academic leaders. Together, these practices constitute preliminary reform necessary to create opportunity for more meaningful practices of inclusion.","PeriodicalId":80590,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis (Montreal, Quebec)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis (Montreal, Quebec)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1096953ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Leadership positions within post-secondary institutions (PSIs) remain elusive to women generally, and to Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women in particular. In this paper, we argue that pathways to leadership, particularly for non-traditional, non-normative and critical approaches that can come from the differently situated epistemic positioning of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized women, are important as beginning steps towards progressively dismantling standardized Eurocentric, androcentric, and corporatized academic workplace cultures. This type of reform is essential preliminary work in the process toward greater equity and inclusivity in academic institutions. Note then that we are writing of a significant amount of substantive change needed to enact crucial initial reform, in tandem with, and beyond which we should continuously push for more radical transformation (Dryden 2022; Patel 2021). As such, we propose initiatives that universities can take to address some of the common gendered, racialized, and class-related exclusions and inequities evident in academic workplaces. This is in acknowledgement that academic institutions, having demonstrated a predilection for the co-optative and performative, are barely able to reform meaningfully, let alone engage the “transformation” and “decolonization” with which reform is often confused and erroneously conflated. Grounded within institutional research, we detail the commitments required from governing bodies, the changes necessary in academic decision-making spaces, the need for timely and transparent data collection infrastructure, and other institutional changes required to enhance the recruitment, hiring, and retention of Black, Indigenous, and other racially minoritized faculty and academic leaders. Together, these practices constitute preliminary reform necessary to create opportunity for more meaningful practices of inclusion.
为黑人、土著和其他少数族裔妇女提供更多的领导途径
一般来说,高等教育机构(psi)的领导职位对女性来说仍然是难以捉摸的,尤其是黑人、土著和其他少数种族的女性。在本文中,我们认为通往领导的途径,特别是非传统的、非规范的和批判性的方法,这些方法可以来自黑人、土著和其他少数族裔女性的不同位置的认知定位,对于逐步拆除标准化的欧洲中心主义、男性中心主义和公司化的学术工作场所文化来说是重要的一步。这种类型的改革是在学术机构中实现更大的公平和包容性的过程中必不可少的初步工作。请注意,我们正在撰写制定关键的初步改革所需的大量实质性变革,与此同时,我们应该继续推动更激进的变革(Dryden 2022;帕特尔2021)。因此,我们提出了一些大学可以采取的举措,以解决学术工作场所中一些常见的性别、种族和阶级相关的排斥和不平等现象。这是承认,学术机构虽然表现出对合作和表演的偏好,但几乎无法进行有意义的改革,更不用说进行改革经常与“转型”和“非殖民化”混淆和错误地混为一谈。在机构研究的基础上,我们详细说明了管理机构需要做出的承诺,学术决策空间的必要变化,及时和透明的数据收集基础设施的需求,以及加强招聘、雇用和保留黑人、土著和其他少数族裔教师和学术领袖所需的其他制度变革。总之,这些做法构成了为更有意义的包容做法创造机会所必需的初步改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信