Forecasting changes of the flow regime at deep geothermal wells based on high resolution sensor data and low resolution chemical analyses

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
A. Dietmaier, T. Baumann
{"title":"Forecasting changes of the flow regime at deep geothermal wells based on high resolution sensor data and low resolution chemical analyses","authors":"A. Dietmaier, T. Baumann","doi":"10.5194/adgeo-58-189-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Geothermal waters provide a great resource to generate clean energy,\nhowever, there is a notorious lack of high quality data on these\nwaters. The scarcity of deep geothermal aquifer information is\nlargely due to inaccessibility and high analysis costs.\nHowever, multiple operators use geothermal wells in Lower Bavaria and Upper\nAustria for balneological (medical and wellness) applications as well\nas for heat mining purposes.\nThe state of the art sampling strategy budgets for a sampling frequency\nof 1 year. Previous studies have shown that robust groundwater data\nrequires sampling intervals of 1–3 months, however, these\nstudies are based on shallow aquifers which are more likely to be\ninfluenced by seasonal changes in meteorological conditions.\nThis study set out to assess whether yearly sampling adequately\nrepresents sub-yearly hydrochemical fluctuations in the aquifer by\ncomparing yearly with quasi-continuous hydrochemical data\nat two wells in southeast Germany by assessing mean, trend and\nseasonality detection among the high and low temporal resolution\ndata sets. Furthermore, the ability to produce reliable forecasts\nbased on yearly data was examined. In order to test the applicability\nof virtual sensors to elevate the information content of yearly data,\ncorrelations between the individual parameters were assessed.\nThe results of this study show that seasonal hydrochemical\nvariations take place in deep aquifers, and are not adequately\nrepresented by yearly data points, as they are typically gathered\nat similar production states of the well and do not show varying\nstates throughout the year. Forecasting on the basis of\nyearly data does not represent the data range of currently\nmeasured continuous data. The limited data availability did not\nallow for strong correlations to be determined.\nWe found that annual measurements, if taken at regular intervals and\nroughly the same production rates, represent only a snapshot of the\npossible hydrochemical compositions. Neither mean values, trends nor\nseasonality was accurately captured by yearly data. This could lead to a violation of stability criteria for mineral water, or to problems in the geothermal operation (scalings, degassing). We thus recommend\na new testing regime of at least 3 samples a year. While not a replacement for the detailed analyses, under the right circumstances, and when trained with more substantial data sets, viertual sensors provide a robust method in this setting to trigger further actions.\n","PeriodicalId":7329,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Geosciences","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-58-189-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Geothermal waters provide a great resource to generate clean energy, however, there is a notorious lack of high quality data on these waters. The scarcity of deep geothermal aquifer information is largely due to inaccessibility and high analysis costs. However, multiple operators use geothermal wells in Lower Bavaria and Upper Austria for balneological (medical and wellness) applications as well as for heat mining purposes. The state of the art sampling strategy budgets for a sampling frequency of 1 year. Previous studies have shown that robust groundwater data requires sampling intervals of 1–3 months, however, these studies are based on shallow aquifers which are more likely to be influenced by seasonal changes in meteorological conditions. This study set out to assess whether yearly sampling adequately represents sub-yearly hydrochemical fluctuations in the aquifer by comparing yearly with quasi-continuous hydrochemical data at two wells in southeast Germany by assessing mean, trend and seasonality detection among the high and low temporal resolution data sets. Furthermore, the ability to produce reliable forecasts based on yearly data was examined. In order to test the applicability of virtual sensors to elevate the information content of yearly data, correlations between the individual parameters were assessed. The results of this study show that seasonal hydrochemical variations take place in deep aquifers, and are not adequately represented by yearly data points, as they are typically gathered at similar production states of the well and do not show varying states throughout the year. Forecasting on the basis of yearly data does not represent the data range of currently measured continuous data. The limited data availability did not allow for strong correlations to be determined. We found that annual measurements, if taken at regular intervals and roughly the same production rates, represent only a snapshot of the possible hydrochemical compositions. Neither mean values, trends nor seasonality was accurately captured by yearly data. This could lead to a violation of stability criteria for mineral water, or to problems in the geothermal operation (scalings, degassing). We thus recommend a new testing regime of at least 3 samples a year. While not a replacement for the detailed analyses, under the right circumstances, and when trained with more substantial data sets, viertual sensors provide a robust method in this setting to trigger further actions.
基于高分辨率传感器数据和低分辨率化学分析的深地热井流态变化预测
摘要地热水是产生清洁能源的重要资源,然而,关于地热水的高质量数据的缺乏是众所周知的。深层地热含水层信息的缺乏主要是由于难以获取和分析成本高。然而,下巴伐利亚州和上奥地利州的多家运营商将地热井用于医学(医疗和健康)应用以及热开采目的。最先进的抽样策略预算的抽样频率为1年。以前的研究表明,可靠的地下水数据需要1-3个月的采样间隔,然而,这些研究是基于更容易受到气象条件季节性变化影响的浅层含水层。本研究通过比较德国东南部两口井的年度水化学数据与准连续水化学数据,通过评估高、低时间分辨率数据集的平均值、趋势和季节性检测,评估年度采样是否充分代表了含水层的次年水化学波动。此外,还审查了根据年度数据进行可靠预测的能力。为了检验虚拟传感器在提高年度数据信息含量方面的适用性,对各参数之间的相关性进行了评估。本研究的结果表明,季节性的水化学变化发生在深层含水层,并且不能充分地用年度数据点来表示,因为它们通常是在井的类似生产状态下收集的,并且不能显示全年的变化状态。基于年度数据的预测不能代表当前连续测量数据的数据范围。有限的数据可用性不允许确定强相关性。我们发现,如果以固定的间隔和大致相同的生产速率进行年度测量,则只能代表可能的水化学成分的快照。无论是平均值、趋势还是季节性都不能通过年度数据准确地捕捉到。这可能会导致违反矿泉水的稳定性标准,或者导致地热操作中的问题(结垢、脱气)。因此,我们建议每年至少进行3个样品的新检测。虽然不能替代详细分析,但在适当的情况下,当使用更大量的数据集进行训练时,虚拟传感器在这种情况下提供了一种强大的方法来触发进一步的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Geosciences
Advances in Geosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Geosciences (ADGEO) is an international, interdisciplinary journal for fast publication of collections of short, but self-contained communications in the Earth, planetary and solar system sciences, published in separate volumes online with the option of a publication on paper (print-on-demand). The collections may include papers presented at scientific meetings (proceedings) or articles on a well defined topic compiled by individual editors or organizations (special publications). The evaluation of the manuscript is organized by Guest-Editors, i.e. either by the conveners of a session of a conference or by the organizers of a meeting or workshop or by editors appointed otherwise, and their chosen referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信