Cultivar Evaluation and Yield Performance of Tomato in an Organic Management System

V. Sidhu, N. Dilip, Wani
{"title":"Cultivar Evaluation and Yield Performance of Tomato in an Organic Management System","authors":"V. Sidhu, N. Dilip, Wani","doi":"10.4172/2376-0354.1000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents evaluation of organic tomato cultivars on yield performance in local climatic conditions. Field research trials were conducted from April to October in 2015 and 2016 growing seasons at the Tennessee State University organic farm. Differences occurred in number of marketable fruit, fruit weight and total soluble solids. ‘Arbason F1’ (28.67 Mt·ha-1), ‘Gold Nugget’ (26.08 Mt·ha-1), ‘Roma’ (25.65 Mt·ha-1) were the high yielding and ‘Pink Bumblebee’ (2.61 Mt·ha-1), ‘Hillbilly’ (3.10 Mt·ha-1), ‘Cherokee Green’ (5.99 Mt·ha-1) had the lowest marketable yield. ‘Mountain Prince’ (57.68%), ‘Pink Brandywine’ (52.32%) and ‘Black Prince’ (44.74%) had the most culls and ‘Pink Bumblebee’ (1.80%), ‘Rutgers VF’ (4.98%), and ‘Hillbilly’ (5.02%) had the fewest cull fruit. ‘Bing Cheery’ and ‘Cheery Sweetie’ ranked highest in taste among cherry types. All twenty six cultivars did set fruits during the growing seasons in local climatic conditions. Results suggest that ‘German Johnson’ and ‘Pink Brandywine’ (beefsteak type), ‘Gold Nugget’, (cherry type), and ‘Roma’, (plum type) were top performers in higher yields and brix.","PeriodicalId":15920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Horticulture","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0354.1000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents evaluation of organic tomato cultivars on yield performance in local climatic conditions. Field research trials were conducted from April to October in 2015 and 2016 growing seasons at the Tennessee State University organic farm. Differences occurred in number of marketable fruit, fruit weight and total soluble solids. ‘Arbason F1’ (28.67 Mt·ha-1), ‘Gold Nugget’ (26.08 Mt·ha-1), ‘Roma’ (25.65 Mt·ha-1) were the high yielding and ‘Pink Bumblebee’ (2.61 Mt·ha-1), ‘Hillbilly’ (3.10 Mt·ha-1), ‘Cherokee Green’ (5.99 Mt·ha-1) had the lowest marketable yield. ‘Mountain Prince’ (57.68%), ‘Pink Brandywine’ (52.32%) and ‘Black Prince’ (44.74%) had the most culls and ‘Pink Bumblebee’ (1.80%), ‘Rutgers VF’ (4.98%), and ‘Hillbilly’ (5.02%) had the fewest cull fruit. ‘Bing Cheery’ and ‘Cheery Sweetie’ ranked highest in taste among cherry types. All twenty six cultivars did set fruits during the growing seasons in local climatic conditions. Results suggest that ‘German Johnson’ and ‘Pink Brandywine’ (beefsteak type), ‘Gold Nugget’, (cherry type), and ‘Roma’, (plum type) were top performers in higher yields and brix.
有机管理体系下番茄品种评价及产量表现
本文介绍了有机番茄品种在当地气候条件下的产量性能评价。田间研究试验于2015年4月至10月在田纳西州立大学有机农场进行。在可销售果实数量、果实重量和总可溶性固形物方面存在差异。‘Arbason F1’(28.67 Mt·ha-1)、‘Gold Nugget’(26.08 Mt·ha-1)、‘Roma’(25.65 Mt·ha-1)产量最高,而‘Pink Bumblebee’(2.61 Mt·ha-1)、‘Hillbilly’(3.10 Mt·ha-1)、‘Cherokee Green’(5.99 Mt·ha-1)的可销售产量最低。“Mountain Prince”(57.68%)、“Pink Brandywine”(52.32%)和“Black Prince”(44.74%)被剔除的水果最多,“Pink Bumblebee”(1.80%)、“Rutgers VF”(4.98%)和“Hillbilly”(5.02%)被剔除的水果最少。在所有樱桃品种中,“Bing Cheery”和“Cheery Sweetie”的味道最高。所有26个品种都在当地气候条件下的生长季节结果。结果表明,“德国约翰逊”和“粉红白兰地”(牛排型)、“金块”(樱桃型)和“罗马”(李子型)在产量和糖度方面表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信