Lexical coherence in contemporary Italian: a lectometric analysis

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS
S. de Pascale, S. Marzo
{"title":"Lexical coherence in contemporary Italian: a lectometric analysis","authors":"S. de Pascale, S. Marzo","doi":"10.1515/soci-2022-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the theoretical question of linguistic coherence by investigating lexical variation in contemporary Italian. In order to tackle issues regarding the coherence of lexical choice, variation is investigated with methods from lexical lectometry, which approaches the structure of language varieties (i.e. lects) by studying aggregate-level lexical distances between them. Based on uniformity measures, as introduced by Geeraerts et al. (1999), we have calculated the internal and external uniformity of spoken and written traditional standard Italian (represented by the academic section of the CORIS corpus for written Italian and the formal parts of the KIP corpus for spoken Italian) and neo-standard Italian (represented by the ParlaTO corpus for spoken Italian and the newspaper section of the CORIS corpus). The results confirm the hypothesis that two standard norms coexist in contemporary Italian and that traditional standard Italian appears to be more coherent at the lexical level than neo-standard Italian. Yet the study also indicates that other forms of coherence exist in contemporary Italian, depending on the adopted theoretical and methodological framework.","PeriodicalId":55923,"journal":{"name":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","volume":"60 1","pages":"145 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treballs de Sociolinguistica Catalana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2022-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the theoretical question of linguistic coherence by investigating lexical variation in contemporary Italian. In order to tackle issues regarding the coherence of lexical choice, variation is investigated with methods from lexical lectometry, which approaches the structure of language varieties (i.e. lects) by studying aggregate-level lexical distances between them. Based on uniformity measures, as introduced by Geeraerts et al. (1999), we have calculated the internal and external uniformity of spoken and written traditional standard Italian (represented by the academic section of the CORIS corpus for written Italian and the formal parts of the KIP corpus for spoken Italian) and neo-standard Italian (represented by the ParlaTO corpus for spoken Italian and the newspaper section of the CORIS corpus). The results confirm the hypothesis that two standard norms coexist in contemporary Italian and that traditional standard Italian appears to be more coherent at the lexical level than neo-standard Italian. Yet the study also indicates that other forms of coherence exist in contemporary Italian, depending on the adopted theoretical and methodological framework.
当代意大利语的词汇连贯性:电析分析
摘要本文通过对当代意大利语词汇变化的研究,探讨语言连贯的理论问题。为了解决词汇选择的连贯性问题,变异研究采用词汇计量学的方法,即通过研究语言变体(即选择)之间的总体词汇距离来研究语言变体(即选择)的结构。根据Geeraerts等人(1999)提出的统一性措施,我们计算了口语和书面语的传统标准意大利语(以CORIS语料库的学术部分为代表,以KIP语料库的正式部分为代表)和新标准意大利语(以ParlaTO语料库为代表,以CORIS语料库的意大利语口语和报纸部分为代表)的内部和外部统一性。结果证实了两种标准规范在当代意大利语中共存的假设,并且传统标准意大利语在词汇层面上似乎比新标准意大利语更连贯。然而,该研究还表明,在当代意大利语中存在其他形式的连贯,这取决于所采用的理论和方法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信