Equitable Response in Crisis: Methodology and Application for COVID-19

IF 1.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Benjamin D. Trump, A. Jin, S. Galaitsi, Christopher Cummings, H. Jarman, S. Greer, Vidur Sharma, I. Linkov
{"title":"Equitable Response in Crisis: Methodology and Application for COVID-19","authors":"Benjamin D. Trump, A. Jin, S. Galaitsi, Christopher Cummings, H. Jarman, S. Greer, Vidur Sharma, I. Linkov","doi":"10.1115/1.4062683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Equitable allocation and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine have proven to be a major policy challenge exacerbated by incomplete pandemic risk data. To rectify this shortcoming, a three-step data visualization methodology was developed to assess COVID-19 vaccination equity in the United States using state health department, U.S. Census, and CDC data. Part one establishes an equitable pathway deviation index to identify populations with limited vaccination. Part two measures perceived access and public intentions to vaccinate over time. Part three synthesizes these data with the social vulnerability index to identify areas and communities at particular risk. Results demonstrate significant equity differences at a census-tract level, and across demographic and socioeconomic population characteristics. Results were used by various federal agencies to improve coordinated pandemic risk response and implement a commitment to equity as defined by the Executive Order regarding COVID-19 vaccination and booster policy. This methodology can be utilized in other fields where addressing the difficulties of promoting health equity in public policy is essential.","PeriodicalId":44694,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equitable allocation and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine have proven to be a major policy challenge exacerbated by incomplete pandemic risk data. To rectify this shortcoming, a three-step data visualization methodology was developed to assess COVID-19 vaccination equity in the United States using state health department, U.S. Census, and CDC data. Part one establishes an equitable pathway deviation index to identify populations with limited vaccination. Part two measures perceived access and public intentions to vaccinate over time. Part three synthesizes these data with the social vulnerability index to identify areas and communities at particular risk. Results demonstrate significant equity differences at a census-tract level, and across demographic and socioeconomic population characteristics. Results were used by various federal agencies to improve coordinated pandemic risk response and implement a commitment to equity as defined by the Executive Order regarding COVID-19 vaccination and booster policy. This methodology can be utilized in other fields where addressing the difficulties of promoting health equity in public policy is essential.
危机中的公平应对:应对COVID-19的方法与应用
事实证明,公平分配和分发COVID-19疫苗是一项重大政策挑战,大流行风险数据不完整加剧了这一挑战。为了纠正这一缺点,研究人员开发了一种三步数据可视化方法,利用州卫生部门、美国人口普查和疾病预防控制中心的数据来评估美国COVID-19疫苗接种的公平性。第一部分建立了一个公平的路径偏差指数来识别有限接种人群。第二部分衡量随着时间的推移,人们对接种疫苗的可及性和公众意愿。第三部分将这些数据与社会脆弱性指数综合起来,以确定特别危险的地区和社区。结果表明,在人口普查区水平上,以及在人口统计学和社会经济人口特征上,存在显著的公平差异。结果被各联邦机构用于改善协调一致的大流行风险应对,并履行行政命令中关于COVID-19疫苗接种和加强政策的公平承诺。这一方法可用于其他领域,在这些领域,必须解决在公共政策中促进卫生公平的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信