Minimal access surgery for organ-sparing interventions with laser light in closed spleen injury: Advantages and disadvantages

V. V. Masljakov, T. Allahjarov, S. Kulikov, M. A. Shihmagomedov
{"title":"Minimal access surgery for organ-sparing interventions with laser light in closed spleen injury: Advantages and disadvantages","authors":"V. V. Masljakov, T. Allahjarov, S. Kulikov, M. A. Shihmagomedov","doi":"10.37895/2071-8004-2020-24-2-3-78-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Actuality . Surgical interventions in case of spleen injury are aimed to achieve a reliable hemostasis, but due to the morphological structure of the spleen suturing does not lead to this goal; therefore, in most cases, surgeries end with splenectomy. However, removal of the spleen causes postplenectomic hyposplenism, and it urges to search for other modalities alternative to splenectomy. Purpose . To assess the effectiveness of interventions with minimal access in the left hypochondrium for organ-sparing surgery (OSS) on the spleen with laser light application. Material and methods . Outcomes of surgical treatment in 126 patients with closed spleen injury were analyzed. Of the total number of patients, organ-preserving surgeries with laser light were performed in 59 (46.8%) cases; among them 36 (28.6%) patients were operated on with minimal access surgery, and in case of upper midline laparotomy – in 23 (18.2%) cases. Medilas fibertom 5100 laser device (DORNIER Ltd) with wavelength 1064 nm was used for the discussed organ-sparing surgeries. In all cases, surgeries were ended with drainage of the abdominal cavity. Results . As it has been found out, the most optimal technique for OSS in spleen injury is laparoscopy which allows not only to evaluate the volume of intra-abdominal blood loss, but also to define the nature of spleen injury and presence or absence of damage to other abdominal organs. The minimal approach for closed spleen injury has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are technical convenience in performing surgery on the spleen and possibility to apply laser technology for OSS. However, OSS with laser light on the spleen with closed injury is recommended if patient’s hemodynamics is stable, organ injury is isolated, OSS is technically possible and there is no any damage to vessels of the spleen hilus. A significant disadvantage of minimal access surgeries is inability to perform a thorough revision of abdominal organs what is compulsory in urgent cases. Conclusion . Minimal access surgery with high-level laser energy in closed spleen injury is possible only if spleen injury is isolated.","PeriodicalId":10008,"journal":{"name":"中国激光医学杂志","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国激光医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37895/2071-8004-2020-24-2-3-78-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actuality . Surgical interventions in case of spleen injury are aimed to achieve a reliable hemostasis, but due to the morphological structure of the spleen suturing does not lead to this goal; therefore, in most cases, surgeries end with splenectomy. However, removal of the spleen causes postplenectomic hyposplenism, and it urges to search for other modalities alternative to splenectomy. Purpose . To assess the effectiveness of interventions with minimal access in the left hypochondrium for organ-sparing surgery (OSS) on the spleen with laser light application. Material and methods . Outcomes of surgical treatment in 126 patients with closed spleen injury were analyzed. Of the total number of patients, organ-preserving surgeries with laser light were performed in 59 (46.8%) cases; among them 36 (28.6%) patients were operated on with minimal access surgery, and in case of upper midline laparotomy – in 23 (18.2%) cases. Medilas fibertom 5100 laser device (DORNIER Ltd) with wavelength 1064 nm was used for the discussed organ-sparing surgeries. In all cases, surgeries were ended with drainage of the abdominal cavity. Results . As it has been found out, the most optimal technique for OSS in spleen injury is laparoscopy which allows not only to evaluate the volume of intra-abdominal blood loss, but also to define the nature of spleen injury and presence or absence of damage to other abdominal organs. The minimal approach for closed spleen injury has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are technical convenience in performing surgery on the spleen and possibility to apply laser technology for OSS. However, OSS with laser light on the spleen with closed injury is recommended if patient’s hemodynamics is stable, organ injury is isolated, OSS is technically possible and there is no any damage to vessels of the spleen hilus. A significant disadvantage of minimal access surgeries is inability to perform a thorough revision of abdominal organs what is compulsory in urgent cases. Conclusion . Minimal access surgery with high-level laser energy in closed spleen injury is possible only if spleen injury is isolated.
闭合性脾损伤激光保留器官介入的最小通路手术:优缺点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5650
期刊介绍: The main columns of "Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery" include treatises, which report the latest research results in basic research and clinical trials in the field of laser medicine; comprehensive reviews of the latest research progress in laser medicine at home and abroad. In addition, there are short reports and excerpts from foreign journals, conference news and other columns. The journal has published a large number of papers on basic research on laser medicine and applied research in various clinical subjects, aiming to play a positive role in promoting the application of laser in medicine and improving the level of laser medicine research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信