Maksa Popov and tamburitza practice in Belgrade in the mid-20th century

Julijana Baštić
{"title":"Maksa Popov and tamburitza practice in Belgrade in the mid-20th century","authors":"Julijana Baštić","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2210217b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnomusicological research is often focused on the study of individuals recognised as prominent musical innovators of their time, and fieldwork, as a fundamental method, is a meeting point of individuals and researchers. Direct encounters lead to interaction between interlocutors, that is, the selected individual, and ethnomusicologists, while indirect contacts include temporal and / or spatial distance, and are reduced to the study of certain biographical data, scores, transcriptions, audio / video recordings and other resources. In that sense, the study of the material legacy of Maksa Popov (1910-1973), published materials, as well as verbal statements of people who were in direct contact with him, sheds light not only on his biography, but also the potential reconstruction of tamburitza practice in Belgrade in the mid-20th century. The period of his activity was marked by significant socio-historical upheavals on the global and local level alike. All these circumstances inevitably affected the life and creative reach of Maksa Popov. Since he spent most of his professional career in Radio Belgrade (first as a musician in the Tamburitza Orchestra conducted by Aleksandar Aranicki, then as Artistic Director of the Radio Belgrade Tamburitza Orchestra, and finally, as a music producer and important figure in institutionalising show business networks), Maksa Popov's musical ethnography opens the possibility of perceiving a broader picture of tamburitza in the context of Belgrade before and after the Second World War.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2210217b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnomusicological research is often focused on the study of individuals recognised as prominent musical innovators of their time, and fieldwork, as a fundamental method, is a meeting point of individuals and researchers. Direct encounters lead to interaction between interlocutors, that is, the selected individual, and ethnomusicologists, while indirect contacts include temporal and / or spatial distance, and are reduced to the study of certain biographical data, scores, transcriptions, audio / video recordings and other resources. In that sense, the study of the material legacy of Maksa Popov (1910-1973), published materials, as well as verbal statements of people who were in direct contact with him, sheds light not only on his biography, but also the potential reconstruction of tamburitza practice in Belgrade in the mid-20th century. The period of his activity was marked by significant socio-historical upheavals on the global and local level alike. All these circumstances inevitably affected the life and creative reach of Maksa Popov. Since he spent most of his professional career in Radio Belgrade (first as a musician in the Tamburitza Orchestra conducted by Aleksandar Aranicki, then as Artistic Director of the Radio Belgrade Tamburitza Orchestra, and finally, as a music producer and important figure in institutionalising show business networks), Maksa Popov's musical ethnography opens the possibility of perceiving a broader picture of tamburitza in the context of Belgrade before and after the Second World War.
20世纪中期,马克萨·波波夫和坦姆布里扎在贝尔格莱德练习
民族音乐学研究通常侧重于研究被认为是当时杰出音乐创新者的个人,而田野调查作为一种基本方法,是个人和研究人员的交汇点。直接接触导致对话者之间的互动,即被选中的个人和民族音乐学家之间的互动,而间接接触包括时间和/或空间距离,并减少到对某些传记数据,分数,转录,音频/视频记录和其他资源的研究。从这个意义上说,对马克萨·波波夫(1910-1973)的物质遗产、出版材料以及与他直接接触的人的口头陈述的研究,不仅揭示了他的传记,而且揭示了20世纪中期贝尔格莱德坦姆布里扎实践的潜在重建。在他的活动期间,全球和地方都发生了重大的社会历史动荡。所有这些都不可避免地影响了马克萨·波波夫的生活和创作范围。由于他的大部分职业生涯都是在贝尔格莱德广播电台度过的(首先是在亚历山大·阿拉尼基指挥的坦姆布里扎管弦乐团担任音乐家,然后是贝尔格莱德广播坦姆布里扎管弦乐团的艺术总监,最后是音乐制作人和演艺事业网络制度化的重要人物),马克萨·波波夫的音乐人种学开启了在第二次世界大战前后的贝尔格莱德背景下观察坦姆布里扎的更广阔图景的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信