The History and Historiography of Guild Hierarchies in the Middle Ages*

É. Anheim
{"title":"The History and Historiography of Guild Hierarchies in the Middle Ages*","authors":"É. Anheim","doi":"10.1017/S2398568200000145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philippe Bernardi’s Maître, valet et apprenti au Moyen Âge. Essai sur une production bien ordonnée, examines the traditional triptych of master craftsman, journeyman, and apprentice, considered to be characteristic of medieval production. By focusing on “work statuses,” Bernardi moves away from an overly narrow legal approach to social status, in which production tends to go largely unanalyzed or else is considered only in curtailed form—as in the model of the three orders where, applying solely to “those who work,” forms of production play only a minor role in social ordering. The originality of his approach lies in the way he constructs his object of study: work hierarchies. These are systematically addressed both in historical terms, on the basis of medieval archives (using the example of Provence in from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century), and in historiographical terms, by examining the models according to which these archives have been interpreted since the nineteenth century. Applying tools drawn from the history of science to medieval history, Bernardi thus uncovers the mechanisms that have shaped our knowledge of medieval society since the nineteenth century, showing that the master-journeyman-apprentice triptych is a representation originating in normative sources that has become a historiographical model, but which does not account for medieval production as it appears in sources relating to practice. Moving beyond this normative view, Bernardi shows that work statuses were mostly relational and functioned as a series of binary oppositions—a reality concealed behind a historiographical discourse woven not only through intellectual experience and critical thinking, but also by beliefs, values, and forms of activism.","PeriodicalId":86691,"journal":{"name":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","volume":"34 1","pages":"685 - 696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398568200000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Philippe Bernardi’s Maître, valet et apprenti au Moyen Âge. Essai sur une production bien ordonnée, examines the traditional triptych of master craftsman, journeyman, and apprentice, considered to be characteristic of medieval production. By focusing on “work statuses,” Bernardi moves away from an overly narrow legal approach to social status, in which production tends to go largely unanalyzed or else is considered only in curtailed form—as in the model of the three orders where, applying solely to “those who work,” forms of production play only a minor role in social ordering. The originality of his approach lies in the way he constructs his object of study: work hierarchies. These are systematically addressed both in historical terms, on the basis of medieval archives (using the example of Provence in from the thirteenth to the fifteenth century), and in historiographical terms, by examining the models according to which these archives have been interpreted since the nineteenth century. Applying tools drawn from the history of science to medieval history, Bernardi thus uncovers the mechanisms that have shaped our knowledge of medieval society since the nineteenth century, showing that the master-journeyman-apprentice triptych is a representation originating in normative sources that has become a historiographical model, but which does not account for medieval production as it appears in sources relating to practice. Moving beyond this normative view, Bernardi shows that work statuses were mostly relational and functioned as a series of binary oppositions—a reality concealed behind a historiographical discourse woven not only through intellectual experience and critical thinking, but also by beliefs, values, and forms of activism.
中世纪行会等级制度的历史与史学*
菲利普·贝尔纳迪(Philippe Bernardi)的matre,仆人和学徒,莫言Âge。这篇文章考察了传统的三联画,即手工艺大师、熟练工和学徒,被认为是中世纪生产的特征。通过关注“工作状态”,伯纳迪摆脱了对社会地位过于狭隘的法律方法,在这种方法中,生产往往在很大程度上不被分析,或者只被认为是一种狭隘的形式——就像在三个命令的模型中一样,只适用于“那些工作的人”,生产形式在社会秩序中只起着很小的作用。他的方法的独创性在于他构建研究对象的方式:工作等级。这些都是系统地处理在历史方面,在中世纪档案的基础上(以普罗旺斯为例,从13世纪到15世纪),并在史学方面,通过检查模型,根据这些档案被解释自19世纪。贝尔纳迪将从科学史中提取的工具应用于中世纪历史,从而揭示了自19世纪以来塑造我们对中世纪社会知识的机制,表明师傅-学徒-学徒三联画是一种起源于规范来源的表征,已成为历史编纂模型,但它并没有解释中世纪生产,因为它出现在与实践有关的来源中。贝尔纳迪超越了这种规范性观点,表明工作状态主要是相互关联的,并作为一系列二元对立发挥作用——这是一个隐藏在史学话语背后的现实,不仅是通过知识经验和批判性思维编织的,而且是由信仰、价值观和行动主义形式编织的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信