‘Here in the US’: Identity narratives, national beliefs and corporate governance values in Big Tech Hearing discourse

Q2 Computer Science
Inge Beekmans, I. Maly, T. Van Hout
{"title":"‘Here in the US’: Identity narratives, national beliefs and corporate governance values in Big Tech Hearing discourse","authors":"Inge Beekmans, I. Maly, T. Van Hout","doi":"10.5210/fm.v28i5.12803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Starting from the idea that understanding Big Tech ideologies is a prerequisite for assessing how major tech corporations see a (re)organization of society, this paper offers an analysis of the opening statements of the CEOs of four of these corporations during 2020 antitrust hearings before the U.S. House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee. These statements were ‘critical discourse moments’ that foregrounded the beliefs of the CEOs in the collision between their discourse and that of government and politics. Using a critical perspective on discourse analysis as a main research approach, this research found that the opening statements blended (inter)national imaginaries, identity narratives and corporate values. Together, these factors communicated the notion of an ideal society in which tech companies awarded themselves a dual role: (1) national conductors towards what we call ‘techno/opportunity’ for individuals, and (2) politically neutral agents in the service of American world dominance. In this sense, ‘competition’ was reconstructed as a practice that, on a national level, must occur within Big Tech instead of between tech corporations and other actors. On an international level competition existed between ideologically opposed nation states where corporations were envisioned as representatives of these states.","PeriodicalId":38833,"journal":{"name":"First Monday","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Monday","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i5.12803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Starting from the idea that understanding Big Tech ideologies is a prerequisite for assessing how major tech corporations see a (re)organization of society, this paper offers an analysis of the opening statements of the CEOs of four of these corporations during 2020 antitrust hearings before the U.S. House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee. These statements were ‘critical discourse moments’ that foregrounded the beliefs of the CEOs in the collision between their discourse and that of government and politics. Using a critical perspective on discourse analysis as a main research approach, this research found that the opening statements blended (inter)national imaginaries, identity narratives and corporate values. Together, these factors communicated the notion of an ideal society in which tech companies awarded themselves a dual role: (1) national conductors towards what we call ‘techno/opportunity’ for individuals, and (2) politically neutral agents in the service of American world dominance. In this sense, ‘competition’ was reconstructed as a practice that, on a national level, must occur within Big Tech instead of between tech corporations and other actors. On an international level competition existed between ideologically opposed nation states where corporations were envisioned as representatives of these states.
“在美国”:大科技听证会话语中的身份叙事、国家信仰和公司治理价值观
从理解大型科技公司的意识形态是评估大型科技公司如何看待(重新)社会组织的先决条件这一观点出发,本文分析了其中四家公司的首席执行官在2020年美国众议院司法反垄断小组委员会举行的反垄断听证会上的开场陈述。这些言论是“关键话语时刻”,在他们的话语与政府和政治的冲突中,突显了ceo们的信念。本研究采用话语分析的批判性视角作为主要研究方法,发现开场白混合了(国际)国家想象、身份叙事和企业价值观。总之,这些因素传达了一个理想社会的概念,在这个理想社会中,科技公司赋予自己双重角色:(1)为个人提供我们所谓的“技术/机会”的国家指挥者,(2)为美国世界主导地位服务的政治中立代理人。从这个意义上说,“竞争”被重构为一种实践,在国家层面上,必须发生在大型科技公司内部,而不是在科技公司和其他参与者之间。在国际层面上,竞争存在于意识形态对立的民族国家之间,公司被视为这些国家的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
First Monday
First Monday Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: First Monday is one of the first openly accessible, peer–reviewed journals on the Internet, solely devoted to the Internet. Since its start in May 1996, First Monday has published 1,035 papers in 164 issues; these papers were written by 1,316 different authors. In addition, eight special issues have appeared. The most recent special issue was entitled A Web site with a view — The Third World on First Monday and it was edited by Eduardo Villanueva Mansilla. First Monday is indexed in Communication Abstracts, Computer & Communications Security Abstracts, DoIS, eGranary Digital Library, INSPEC, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, LISA, PAIS, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信