Questionnaries about the famine as a source to a history of the Holodomor studies

T. Boriak
{"title":"Questionnaries about the famine as a source to a history of the Holodomor studies","authors":"T. Boriak","doi":"10.26565/2227-6505-2021-33-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aim: The article has a goal to figure out a connection between questionnaires about the famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine and the state of development of the Holodomor studies.\n\nResearch methodology: historical-comparative method is used.\n\nScientific novelty: for the first time correlation of five full-text questionnaires about the famine on every of three stages of formation of massive of the Holodomor oral history sources (1933, 1980s and after 1991). The author for the first time makes a reconstruction of research perceptions about the reasons, course and scale of the famine, as well as analyzes their evolution.\n\nConclusions: the article analyzes questionanries created during three periods (from 1933 till mid of 2000s) that allows researching of evolution of the famine studies. The first questionnarie has become a reaction of the people of a free of communist ideology world. Because of the objective reasons (and escape to the West was made under a threat of shooting) they tries to put starvation into a Procrustean bed of collectivization, to find a logical explanation of the famine reasons, particularly in illnesses. The article demonstrates non-comprehension by them realities of everyday life of a Ukrainian countryside. Questionnaires elaborated in Canada and USA in 1980s, demonstrates much more higher level of understanding of the problem. Their authors actively involved theory of oral history, included question about personal data of a respondent, his family, education, social and property condition; a question about a peasant resistance appeared. One can see an attempt to figure out time frames of starvation. Comprehension of such events appeared as searches and confiscation of bread. Questionnaires prepared on a third period cover maximum wide spectrum of starving village problems. Appearance of a set of new questions indicates about development of knowledge about the Holоdomor. These questions fully reflect contemporary approaches to the processes, the whole set of which comprises the Holodomor of 1932–1933. To the contrary, questionnaire by a Russian historian V. Kondrashyn indicates different from Ukrainian famine essence of the Russian famine of 1930s.","PeriodicalId":12328,"journal":{"name":"Februar 33","volume":"473 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Februar 33","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2021-33-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research aim: The article has a goal to figure out a connection between questionnaires about the famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine and the state of development of the Holodomor studies. Research methodology: historical-comparative method is used. Scientific novelty: for the first time correlation of five full-text questionnaires about the famine on every of three stages of formation of massive of the Holodomor oral history sources (1933, 1980s and after 1991). The author for the first time makes a reconstruction of research perceptions about the reasons, course and scale of the famine, as well as analyzes their evolution. Conclusions: the article analyzes questionanries created during three periods (from 1933 till mid of 2000s) that allows researching of evolution of the famine studies. The first questionnarie has become a reaction of the people of a free of communist ideology world. Because of the objective reasons (and escape to the West was made under a threat of shooting) they tries to put starvation into a Procrustean bed of collectivization, to find a logical explanation of the famine reasons, particularly in illnesses. The article demonstrates non-comprehension by them realities of everyday life of a Ukrainian countryside. Questionnaires elaborated in Canada and USA in 1980s, demonstrates much more higher level of understanding of the problem. Their authors actively involved theory of oral history, included question about personal data of a respondent, his family, education, social and property condition; a question about a peasant resistance appeared. One can see an attempt to figure out time frames of starvation. Comprehension of such events appeared as searches and confiscation of bread. Questionnaires prepared on a third period cover maximum wide spectrum of starving village problems. Appearance of a set of new questions indicates about development of knowledge about the Holоdomor. These questions fully reflect contemporary approaches to the processes, the whole set of which comprises the Holodomor of 1932–1933. To the contrary, questionnaire by a Russian historian V. Kondrashyn indicates different from Ukrainian famine essence of the Russian famine of 1930s.
关于饥荒的问卷调查是大屠杀研究历史的来源
研究目的:本文的目的是找出关于1932-1933年乌克兰饥荒的问卷调查与大饥荒研究的发展状况之间的联系。研究方法:采用历史比较法。科学上的新颖性:首次将五份关于饥荒的全文调查问卷与浩劫口述历史资料形成的三个阶段(1933年、1980年代和1991年以后)进行了相关性研究。作者首次对饥荒发生的原因、过程和规模的研究认识进行了重构,并对其演变进行了分析。结论:本文分析了三个时期(从1933年到2000年代中期)的问卷,这些问卷可以研究饥荒研究的演变。第一次问卷调查已经成为一个自由的共产主义意识形态世界的人们的反应。由于客观原因(逃到西方是在枪毙的威胁下进行的),他们试图把饥饿放在普罗克鲁斯特的集体化的床上,寻找饥荒原因的逻辑解释,特别是在疾病方面。这篇文章展示了他们对乌克兰农村日常生活现实的不理解。1980年代在加拿大和美国制定的调查问卷显示了对这个问题更高层次的理解。问卷作者积极运用口述历史理论,包括被访者的个人资料、家庭、教育、社会和财产状况等问题;一个关于农民抵抗的问题出现了。人们可以看到人们试图计算出饥饿的时间框架。对这些事件的理解表现为搜查和没收面包。第三期编制的调查问卷涵盖了最广泛的农村饥饿问题。一组新问题的出现表明了关于霍尔科夫多莫尔的知识的发展。这些问题充分反映了当代处理这些进程的方法,这些进程包括1932-1933年的大萧条。相反,俄罗斯历史学家V. Kondrashyn的问卷调查表明,20世纪30年代俄罗斯饥荒的本质不同于乌克兰饥荒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信