Effects of cyclosporine on ischemia-reperfusion injuries in rat kidneys. An experimental model 1

Antonio Carlos Cerqueira Oliveira, N. S. Módolo, M. Domingues, P. Schwingel
{"title":"Effects of cyclosporine on ischemia-reperfusion injuries in rat kidneys. An experimental model 1","authors":"Antonio Carlos Cerqueira Oliveira, N. S. Módolo, M. Domingues, P. Schwingel","doi":"10.1590/s0102-865020190080000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose To assess Cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy at an intraperitoneal dose of 15 mg.kg -1 in a rodent model of non-septic renal ischemia. Methods Twenty male Wistar rats were randomized to receive CsA therapy or none therapy before undergoing 30 minutes of renal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Additionally, 10 rats were randomized to undergo the same surgical procedure of the aforementioned animals with neither ischemia nor CsA therapy. Twelve hours after kidney ischemia, the left kidneys were evaluated for histological injury according to Park’s criteria. Serum creatinine (Cr), urea nitrogen (Ur) and sodium levels were obtained at different times of the experimental protocol. Results Rodents in the CsA group showed negative results (p<0.05) in serum variables (Cr: 0.41±0.05mg/dL vs . 4.17±1.25mg/dL; Ur: 40.90±3.98mg/dL vs . 187.70±22.93mg/dL) even the non CsA or control group (Cr: 0.35±0.07mg/dL vs . 3.80±1.20mg/dL; Ur: 40.10±4.70mg/dL vs . 184.50±49.80mg/dL). The negative results were also verified in histological evaluation, CsA group had 50% in the very severe grade of lesion, 10% in the severe and 40% in the moderate to severe whereas the control group had 90% in the very severe grade. Conclusion CsA was incapable of preventing the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat kidneys.","PeriodicalId":6993,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190080000006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess Cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy at an intraperitoneal dose of 15 mg.kg -1 in a rodent model of non-septic renal ischemia. Methods Twenty male Wistar rats were randomized to receive CsA therapy or none therapy before undergoing 30 minutes of renal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Additionally, 10 rats were randomized to undergo the same surgical procedure of the aforementioned animals with neither ischemia nor CsA therapy. Twelve hours after kidney ischemia, the left kidneys were evaluated for histological injury according to Park’s criteria. Serum creatinine (Cr), urea nitrogen (Ur) and sodium levels were obtained at different times of the experimental protocol. Results Rodents in the CsA group showed negative results (p<0.05) in serum variables (Cr: 0.41±0.05mg/dL vs . 4.17±1.25mg/dL; Ur: 40.90±3.98mg/dL vs . 187.70±22.93mg/dL) even the non CsA or control group (Cr: 0.35±0.07mg/dL vs . 3.80±1.20mg/dL; Ur: 40.10±4.70mg/dL vs . 184.50±49.80mg/dL). The negative results were also verified in histological evaluation, CsA group had 50% in the very severe grade of lesion, 10% in the severe and 40% in the moderate to severe whereas the control group had 90% in the very severe grade. Conclusion CsA was incapable of preventing the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat kidneys.
环孢素对大鼠肾缺血再灌注损伤的影响。实验模型1
目的评价环孢素A (CsA)腹腔注射15mg的治疗效果。Kg -1在非败血性肾缺血啮齿动物模型中的作用。方法雄性Wistar大鼠20只,随机分为两组,分别给予CsA治疗和不给予CsA治疗,然后进行30min肾缺血再灌注。另外,随机选择10只大鼠进行与上述动物相同的手术,既不缺血也不进行CsA治疗。肾缺血12小时后,根据Park的标准评估左肾的组织学损伤。在实验方案的不同时间测定血清肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(Ur)和钠水平。结果CsA组小鼠血清各项指标(Cr: 0.41±0.05mg/dL vs . 0.05mg/dL)均呈阴性(p<0.05)。4.17±1.25 mg / dL;Ur: 40.90±3.98mg/dL vs。(187.70±22.93mg/dL),即使非CsA或对照组(Cr: 0.35±0.07mg/dL vs。3.80±1.20 mg / dL;Ur: 40.10±4.70mg/dL vs。184.50±49.80 mg / dL)。组织学评价也证实了阴性结果,CsA组病变极重度50%,重度10%,中重度40%,而对照组病变极重度90%。结论CsA不能预防大鼠肾缺血再灌注损伤的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信