Anticancer and antioxidant activities of Cordia dichotoma Forst

N. Hussain
{"title":"Anticancer and antioxidant activities of Cordia dichotoma Forst","authors":"N. Hussain","doi":"10.22377/ijgp.v14i03.2940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study was carried out to evaluate the antitumor and antioxidant activities of the methanol extract of Cordia dichotoma (MECD) against EAC in Swiss albino mice. Materials and Methods: The present study evaluated the anticancer effect of the methanolic extract of C. dichotoma (MECD) bark against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells induced in albino mice and against human cancer cell lines (malondialdehyde-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells). Results and Discussion: There was significant fall in the red blood cell count and hemoglobin (Hb) content, and a significant increase in white blood cell (WBC) count in the EAC control mice as compared to normal control mice. Treatment with MECD (500 mg/kg, b.w., p.o.) or 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg b.w., i.p.) in EAC-cell bearing mice caused a significant (P < 0.01) increase in Hb levels while a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in WBC levels compared to EAC control rats. Furthermore, increase in the concentration of MECD dose-dependently increased the percent cytotoxicity and decreased the cell viability in both cell line types. The results with MECD were comparable to the tamoxifen. The maximum gain of body weight was observed in the EAC control group. In case of MECD and 5-Fluorouracil treated groups, the body weight was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced. The tumor volume and tumor weight were found to be significantly (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) decreased in MECD treated animals at the doses 250 and 500 mg/kg and 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg) when compared with EAC control animals. With MECD treatment, the survival of EAC bearing mice significantly (P < 0.01) increased as compared to EAC bearing control group. In treated group, mean survival time (MST) was significantly increased to 29.0 ± 1.98 (%ILS = 69.04), 34.12 ± 1.84 (%ILS = 81.25), and 36.87 ± 1.67 (%ILS = 87.79), respectively, when compared to EAC control group. Conclusion: The results of the current study propose that the antitumor activity of MECD can be inferred from the increased life span of EAC bearing mice which is due to its antioxidant activity.","PeriodicalId":14055,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Green Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Green Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22377/ijgp.v14i03.2940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Objective: The present study was carried out to evaluate the antitumor and antioxidant activities of the methanol extract of Cordia dichotoma (MECD) against EAC in Swiss albino mice. Materials and Methods: The present study evaluated the anticancer effect of the methanolic extract of C. dichotoma (MECD) bark against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells induced in albino mice and against human cancer cell lines (malondialdehyde-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells). Results and Discussion: There was significant fall in the red blood cell count and hemoglobin (Hb) content, and a significant increase in white blood cell (WBC) count in the EAC control mice as compared to normal control mice. Treatment with MECD (500 mg/kg, b.w., p.o.) or 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg b.w., i.p.) in EAC-cell bearing mice caused a significant (P < 0.01) increase in Hb levels while a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in WBC levels compared to EAC control rats. Furthermore, increase in the concentration of MECD dose-dependently increased the percent cytotoxicity and decreased the cell viability in both cell line types. The results with MECD were comparable to the tamoxifen. The maximum gain of body weight was observed in the EAC control group. In case of MECD and 5-Fluorouracil treated groups, the body weight was significantly (P < 0.01) reduced. The tumor volume and tumor weight were found to be significantly (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) decreased in MECD treated animals at the doses 250 and 500 mg/kg and 5-Fluorouracil (20 mg/kg) when compared with EAC control animals. With MECD treatment, the survival of EAC bearing mice significantly (P < 0.01) increased as compared to EAC bearing control group. In treated group, mean survival time (MST) was significantly increased to 29.0 ± 1.98 (%ILS = 69.04), 34.12 ± 1.84 (%ILS = 81.25), and 36.87 ± 1.67 (%ILS = 87.79), respectively, when compared to EAC control group. Conclusion: The results of the current study propose that the antitumor activity of MECD can be inferred from the increased life span of EAC bearing mice which is due to its antioxidant activity.
山茱萸的抗癌和抗氧化活性
目的:研究芫花甲醇提取物(MECD)对瑞士白化小鼠EAC的抗肿瘤和抗氧化作用。材料与方法:本研究评价了二叉树树皮(MECD)甲醇提取物对白化小鼠诱导的埃利希腹水癌(EAC)细胞和人癌细胞(丙二醛- mb -231和MCF-7细胞)的抗癌作用。结果与讨论:与正常对照组小鼠相比,EAC对照组小鼠红细胞计数和血红蛋白(Hb)含量显著下降,白细胞计数显著增加。与EAC对照大鼠相比,MECD (500 mg/kg, b.w., p.o.)或5-氟尿嘧啶(20 mg/kg b.w., i.p)对EAC细胞携带小鼠的Hb水平显著(P < 0.01)升高,WBC水平显著(P < 0.01)降低。此外,MECD浓度的增加呈剂量依赖性地增加了两种细胞系类型的细胞毒性百分比,并降低了细胞活力。MECD与他莫昔芬的效果相当。EAC对照组体重增重最大。MECD组和5-氟尿嘧啶组体重显著(P < 0.01)降低。与EAC对照动物相比,250、500 mg/kg和5-氟尿嘧啶(20 mg/kg)剂量的MECD处理动物的肿瘤体积和肿瘤重量显著或极显著(P < 0.05或P < 0.01)降低。经MECD处理后,与对照组相比,EAC承载小鼠的存活率显著提高(P < 0.01)。治疗组的平均生存时间(MST)较EAC对照组显著提高,分别为29.0±1.98 (%ILS = 69.04)、34.12±1.84 (%ILS = 81.25)和36.87±1.67 (%ILS = 87.79)。结论:MECD具有抗氧化作用,其抗氧化作用可延长EAC小鼠的寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信