Bordentown: Where Dewey's "Learning to Earn" Met Du Boisian Educational Priorities: The Unique Legacy of a Once Thriving but Largely Forgotten School for Black Students
{"title":"Bordentown: Where Dewey's \"Learning to Earn\" Met Du Boisian Educational Priorities: The Unique Legacy of a Once Thriving but Largely Forgotten School for Black Students","authors":"Connie Goddard","doi":"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.35.1.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:John Dewey and W.E.B. Du Bois were prominent critics of how vocational education programs were often used to restrict rather than enhance student aspirations. An overview of the Bordentown Manual Training and Industrial School for Colored Youth (1886–1955) suggests that it met requirements both men articulated for the right kind of vocational education; however, the school's legacy has been largely ignored by historians. Further, Dewey and Du Bois, who knew of but had little interaction with each other, may never have discussed their shared interest in vocational education or their awareness of the school's mission and accomplishments.","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":"76 1","pages":"49 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.35.1.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract:John Dewey and W.E.B. Du Bois were prominent critics of how vocational education programs were often used to restrict rather than enhance student aspirations. An overview of the Bordentown Manual Training and Industrial School for Colored Youth (1886–1955) suggests that it met requirements both men articulated for the right kind of vocational education; however, the school's legacy has been largely ignored by historians. Further, Dewey and Du Bois, who knew of but had little interaction with each other, may never have discussed their shared interest in vocational education or their awareness of the school's mission and accomplishments.
摘要:杜威(John Dewey)和杜波依斯(W.E.B. Du Bois)是对职业教育项目往往被用来限制而不是增强学生抱负的著名批评者。博登敦有色青年手工培训和工业学校(1886-1955)的概述表明,它满足了两个人为正确的职业教育所阐述的要求;然而,这所学校的遗产在很大程度上被历史学家忽视了。此外,杜威和杜波依斯彼此了解,但很少互动,可能从来没有讨论过他们对职业教育的共同兴趣,也没有讨论过他们对学校使命和成就的认识。