Monica K. Kansiime , Piet van Asten , Koen Sneyers
{"title":"Farm diversity and resource use efficiency: Targeting agricultural policy interventions in East Africa farming systems","authors":"Monica K. Kansiime , Piet van Asten , Koen Sneyers","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2017.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aimed to provide empirical evidence on the links between farm diversity and resource use efficiency. Using farm typology and stochastic production frontier approaches, we grouped households into those pursuing similar livelihood strategies and assessed their resource use efficiency. At 60% coefficient of similarity, we identified three distinct farm types – Farm-specialised, Diversified and Off-farm specialised. Significant (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) differences across farm types were observed for, the proportion of income from farming, farmed area, and land use patterns, confirming these as good indicators for distinguishing between farm types. Over 50% of surveyed households were categorised as Diversified and Off-farm specialised, and mainly pursued off-farm livelihood strategies. Farm-specialised households pursued mainly farm-based activities and earned higher net incomes compared to other farm types. However, they exhibited technical inefficiency in the use of labour and fertiliser compared to other farm types. Access to extension and commercial orientation showed significant (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01) positive effect on technical efficiency for Farm-specialised households. Results have implications for policies and programmes aimed at improving agricultural productivity. There is need to focus support on interventions that make a significant contribution to farm efficiency, in particular, extension services and market access. Agricultural programmes are likely to be successful if they are targeted to households reliant on agriculture, while, off-farm households could be oriented towards off-farm agri-enterprises such as processing and marketing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2017.12.001","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521417300337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42
Abstract
This paper aimed to provide empirical evidence on the links between farm diversity and resource use efficiency. Using farm typology and stochastic production frontier approaches, we grouped households into those pursuing similar livelihood strategies and assessed their resource use efficiency. At 60% coefficient of similarity, we identified three distinct farm types – Farm-specialised, Diversified and Off-farm specialised. Significant (p < 0.01) differences across farm types were observed for, the proportion of income from farming, farmed area, and land use patterns, confirming these as good indicators for distinguishing between farm types. Over 50% of surveyed households were categorised as Diversified and Off-farm specialised, and mainly pursued off-farm livelihood strategies. Farm-specialised households pursued mainly farm-based activities and earned higher net incomes compared to other farm types. However, they exhibited technical inefficiency in the use of labour and fertiliser compared to other farm types. Access to extension and commercial orientation showed significant (p < 0.01) positive effect on technical efficiency for Farm-specialised households. Results have implications for policies and programmes aimed at improving agricultural productivity. There is need to focus support on interventions that make a significant contribution to farm efficiency, in particular, extension services and market access. Agricultural programmes are likely to be successful if they are targeted to households reliant on agriculture, while, off-farm households could be oriented towards off-farm agri-enterprises such as processing and marketing.
期刊介绍:
The NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, published since 1952, is the quarterly journal of the Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. NJAS aspires to be the main scientific platform for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on complex and persistent problems in agricultural production, food and nutrition security and natural resource management. The societal and technical challenges in these domains require research integrating scientific disciplines and finding novel combinations of methodologies and conceptual frameworks. Moreover, the composite nature of these problems and challenges fits transdisciplinary research approaches embedded in constructive interactions with policy and practice and crossing the boundaries between science and society. Engaging with societal debate and creating decision space is an important task of research about the diverse impacts of novel agri-food technologies or policies. The international nature of food and nutrition security (e.g. global value chains, standardisation, trade), environmental problems (e.g. climate change or competing claims on natural resources), and risks related to agriculture (e.g. the spread of plant and animal diseases) challenges researchers to focus not only on lower levels of aggregation, but certainly to use interdisciplinary research to unravel linkages between scales or to analyse dynamics at higher levels of aggregation.
NJAS recognises that the widely acknowledged need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, also increasingly expressed by policy makers and practitioners, needs a platform for creative researchers and out-of-the-box thinking in the domains of agriculture, food and environment. The journal aims to offer space for grounded, critical, and open discussions that advance the development and application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methodologies in the agricultural and life sciences.