Farm diversity and resource use efficiency: Targeting agricultural policy interventions in East Africa farming systems

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Monica K. Kansiime , Piet van Asten , Koen Sneyers
{"title":"Farm diversity and resource use efficiency: Targeting agricultural policy interventions in East Africa farming systems","authors":"Monica K. Kansiime ,&nbsp;Piet van Asten ,&nbsp;Koen Sneyers","doi":"10.1016/j.njas.2017.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aimed to provide empirical evidence on the links between farm diversity and resource use efficiency. Using farm typology and stochastic production frontier approaches, we grouped households into those pursuing similar livelihood strategies and assessed their resource use efficiency. At 60% coefficient of similarity, we identified three distinct farm types – Farm-specialised, Diversified and Off-farm specialised. Significant (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) differences across farm types were observed for, the proportion of income from farming, farmed area, and land use patterns, confirming these as good indicators for distinguishing between farm types. Over 50% of surveyed households were categorised as Diversified and Off-farm specialised, and mainly pursued off-farm livelihood strategies. Farm-specialised households pursued mainly farm-based activities and earned higher net incomes compared to other farm types. However, they exhibited technical inefficiency in the use of labour and fertiliser compared to other farm types. Access to extension and commercial orientation showed significant (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01) positive effect on technical efficiency for Farm-specialised households. Results have implications for policies and programmes aimed at improving agricultural productivity. There is need to focus support on interventions that make a significant contribution to farm efficiency, in particular, extension services and market access. Agricultural programmes are likely to be successful if they are targeted to households reliant on agriculture, while, off-farm households could be oriented towards off-farm agri-enterprises such as processing and marketing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49751,"journal":{"name":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.njas.2017.12.001","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1573521417300337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

This paper aimed to provide empirical evidence on the links between farm diversity and resource use efficiency. Using farm typology and stochastic production frontier approaches, we grouped households into those pursuing similar livelihood strategies and assessed their resource use efficiency. At 60% coefficient of similarity, we identified three distinct farm types – Farm-specialised, Diversified and Off-farm specialised. Significant (p < 0.01) differences across farm types were observed for, the proportion of income from farming, farmed area, and land use patterns, confirming these as good indicators for distinguishing between farm types. Over 50% of surveyed households were categorised as Diversified and Off-farm specialised, and mainly pursued off-farm livelihood strategies. Farm-specialised households pursued mainly farm-based activities and earned higher net incomes compared to other farm types. However, they exhibited technical inefficiency in the use of labour and fertiliser compared to other farm types. Access to extension and commercial orientation showed significant (p < 0.01) positive effect on technical efficiency for Farm-specialised households. Results have implications for policies and programmes aimed at improving agricultural productivity. There is need to focus support on interventions that make a significant contribution to farm efficiency, in particular, extension services and market access. Agricultural programmes are likely to be successful if they are targeted to households reliant on agriculture, while, off-farm households could be oriented towards off-farm agri-enterprises such as processing and marketing.

农场多样性和资源利用效率:针对东非农业系统的农业政策干预
本文旨在为农业多样性与资源利用效率之间的联系提供实证证据。利用农场类型学和随机生产前沿方法,我们将追求相似生计策略的家庭分组,并评估其资源利用效率。在60%的相似系数下,我们确定了三种不同的农场类型——农场专门化、多元化和非农场专门化。显著性(p <在农业收入比例、耕种面积和土地利用模式方面,观察到不同农场类型之间的差异(0.01),证实这些是区分农场类型的良好指标。超过50%的被调查家庭被归类为多元化和非农业专业化,主要采取非农业生计战略。与其他农场类型相比,农业专业家庭主要从事以农场为基础的活动,净收入更高。然而,与其他类型的农场相比,它们在使用劳动力和肥料方面表现出技术上的低效率。获得扩展和商业导向显著(p <0.01)对农户技术效率有正向影响。结果对旨在提高农业生产力的政策和方案具有影响。需要重点支持对农业效率有重大贡献的干预措施,特别是推广服务和市场准入。农业方案如果以依赖农业的家庭为目标,就有可能取得成功,而非农业家庭则可以面向加工和销售等非农业农业企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, published since 1952, is the quarterly journal of the Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. NJAS aspires to be the main scientific platform for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research on complex and persistent problems in agricultural production, food and nutrition security and natural resource management. The societal and technical challenges in these domains require research integrating scientific disciplines and finding novel combinations of methodologies and conceptual frameworks. Moreover, the composite nature of these problems and challenges fits transdisciplinary research approaches embedded in constructive interactions with policy and practice and crossing the boundaries between science and society. Engaging with societal debate and creating decision space is an important task of research about the diverse impacts of novel agri-food technologies or policies. The international nature of food and nutrition security (e.g. global value chains, standardisation, trade), environmental problems (e.g. climate change or competing claims on natural resources), and risks related to agriculture (e.g. the spread of plant and animal diseases) challenges researchers to focus not only on lower levels of aggregation, but certainly to use interdisciplinary research to unravel linkages between scales or to analyse dynamics at higher levels of aggregation. NJAS recognises that the widely acknowledged need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, also increasingly expressed by policy makers and practitioners, needs a platform for creative researchers and out-of-the-box thinking in the domains of agriculture, food and environment. The journal aims to offer space for grounded, critical, and open discussions that advance the development and application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research methodologies in the agricultural and life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信